I don't think I would attempt a VBAC at home personally, because although the risk of uterine rupture is quite small, if it does happen they need to be able to do a C-section within 30 minutes.
The was a story in the news this week about a woman who sadly died after her uterus ruptured during an attempted VBAC, and that was in a hospital environment. According to the article she had had one prior C-section but there were complications, and she had to have further surgery on her uterus afterwards. This meant that the hospital doctors treated her as though she'd had one prior C-section, whereas the scarring on her uterus was more consistent with someone who had had two prior C-sections. The implication in the article is that she wouldn't have been approved for an attempted VBAC, or that they would have handled it differently, if they'd considered her as a patient who had had two C-sections. They also used syntocinon, which is known to increase the risk of uterine rupture.
I recently had a successful VBAC. They would have used syntocinon on me, but only very sparingly, and they would have moved to do a C-section pretty quickly if my labour hadn't been progressing well. In the end I went into labour spontaneously and didn't need syntocinon, which I was very glad about. I don't think they would have supported me to try for a VBA2C, so in my head it was very much my last chance to give birth vaginally, because if I had had another C-section and then decided to have a third child, it would certainly have been a planned C-section the third time.
I think you need to get hold of all your notes from your two previous births and see if you can have an appointment with a consultant to discuss whether you are a suitable candidate for a VBA2C and what measures will be put in place to minimise the risks.
Personally in your position I would have an elective C-section and focus on making a birth plan that allows you to have the most positive experience possible. But it's up to you and your doctor to decide.