Hi
I am also expecting and having similar debate. I have weak pelvic floor and significant prolapses- following my first born having a complicated delivery.
So whilst I am different physically- I share your feeling I cannot afford for my pelvic floor to deteriorate anymore. I have had to change my job and lifestyle already
What I noticed when my first born was breach was Doctors completly emphasised the risks of c- section. I was given two A4 sheets detailing all the side effects of c sections, as well as the consultants verbally highlighting risks. The last sentence of the 2nd page mentioned that breach/ back to back vaginal deliveries have increased chances of instrumental delivery. When I asked what that meant they said not to worry.
I would highlight C- sections cost a lot more so I believe that may influence why some hospitals discourage these
Thats not minimising the risks. I know they can come with life changing symptoms too
After I had severe continence issues I met with a correctal surgeon who suggested ‘if you didn’t want to be incontinent you shouldn’t have had a baby’
‘what did you expect’
He was the same consultant who declined me a c- section when my baby was breach
With this pregnancy my husband has suggested we should just go with what the medics decide is safer ( to date consultants/ midwives have had contrasting opinions ) I have highlighted, that I think on labour suits they naturally focus on immediate safety not long term impact on your life/ on woman’s life
Saying that it’s still not an easy decision for me - I know a c section does affect your pelvic floor.
Part of me thinks since every consultant/ physio warns against constipation/ a pushing motion surely natural birth is worse
I also ( completely illogically ) think the damage is already done down there. If my organs are falling out surely a baby will come out easier this time round 🙈