I would consider them institutions, I would go as far as to consider them total institutions, in that they infiltrate most aspects of the employees life. Some lawyers barely leave the building, and they are set up that way with gyms on site, GP next door, canteens that serve 24 hours etc, beds on site, some offer accommodation etc.
I also think that in some fields once you get to a very senior position your background begins to take on more of a significance - you lifestyle, where you live, whether you are married, have children, where you send them to school, where you holiday, all sorts. You start to be invited to dinners with the big bosses, or you are expected to host others colleagues and their families. Sometimes you are even expected to shape your family for work. I know of one woman who was told NOT to have any more children or she wouldn't be promoted, I think someone said similar upthread.
I agree that what I spoke about with regards to partner choice is horrible. That just doesn't make it any less true. I am also bound to say that I have every faith that your marriages are built on love. It just doesn't follow to me that therefore they all are. I am very aware that people marry for many reasons besides or in addition to love. For example, we live in a heterocentric world. Lots of homosexual people marry straight partners because rightly or wrongly they believe life will be better that way. We live in a white supremacist part of the world, some black people marry white people for the same reason. Just to underline, I did not make the world so, it is thus and these are the outcomes.
I've known gay men and lesbian women marry straight partners. I've known black people marry white people because it helps. I've known non-Americans marry Americans for a green card. I've known people with little money marry people with lots of money. I've known people marry for passports.
I'm not saying you did, or all people do, or even that most do, I'm saying some do, a not insignificant number of people, marry for those kinds of reasons.
They just do. It makes perfect sense, too.
I'm not sure I'm the problem here....
Thanks