Disneystar, I am not having a go. I am trying to argue a case without calling anyone an idiot or irresponsible, simply on the merits of the case. Arguing a different position from somebody else is not the same as having a go at that person.
In my personal opinion, the law is right not to allow parents to give any alcohol to a child under 5. I did not give alcohol to my children at that age either. I have no quarrel with this law.
For older children, I do not think a tiny sip of wine is going to make them so hooked on the taste of alcohol that they have to become addicted. Taking communion as a young teenager did not have that effect on me and having the occasional sip of wine did not have that effect on dh.
On the other hand, I do not think allowing sips is necessarily going to save a person from ever becoming addicted either.
IME the factors that decide if a person becomes addicted are far more wide ranging than this fairly minor matter. They include:
whether the family is stable and supportive or not
whether the parents are themselves addicted or able to control their drinking
whether a child grows up with good self esteem or feels a constant lack of control
whether a child has suffered other damage (such as abuse) that alcohol can take their attention away from or whether they are able to feel happy when sober
whether parents are able to teach good ways of problem solving which do not involve drinking for comfort
whether other influences in a young person's life (friends, partner, workplace) encourage addiction or a controlled attitude towards life
In my own case, all the above tended towards the positive, which I suspect is the reason why the communion wine did me no harm.
People do not become addicts simply because they like the taste- lots of us like the taste and are not addicted.