This is a mature response which is appreciated. I don't agree. But you express yourself well.
I think it's important to be pedantic. I am often appalled at the level of literacy and numeracy displayed by graduates with 2:1 degrees today. It must drive employers up the wall, especially in other professions such as law and accountancy where incorrectly using 'you're' and 'your' to a client just makes the £100+/hour professional look incompetent.
"I enclose you're bill for the hours rendered..." (errrr)
It reflects poorly on the firm and in my opinion is unfair on the employer.
I don't think I'm expecting too much that a qualified teacher can deploy their and there in the correct context.
Yes, the Department for Education is desperate for new teachers, but it's a pitiful day when a Year 6 child has a greater command of the English language than the teacher before him or her. Pupils need to have a reason to respect teachers and teachers need to lead by example to gain respect, especially in a classroom role with disaffected children.
I don't buy into this touchy-feely stuff of "follow your dreams OP"... It costs time, effort and money (indirectly, public tax) to train teachers, just as it does doctors, and some people should not be given the opportunity unless they have reached a threshold of competence beforehand. A degree from the University of Bognor Regis should not be enough... You need English, Maths, a presence... It's how it used to be - Before we became desperate and Simon Cowell encouraged everyone to 'follow their dreams' on a Saturday night...like children in a class, people laughed at the deluded people who thought they were great. They should never have been given the opportunity to be humiliated in the first place.
It made good TV, but it was wrong. Taking people who can't utilise 'their' or 'there' correctly on a PGCE course is exactly the same.
Set to fail. A waste of everyone's time.
Some TA's should be welcomed with open arms. Others should not.