Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU Income Tax rise.

627 replies

H202too · 30/10/2025 09:56

To be panicking about income tax rise.

Things are tight and to loae even £30-60 a month will be difficult.

I know people are talking about the mansion tax being a no go. But I would prefer this than taxing the workers as per usual.
The tax free rate should be put up. What a mess.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
dottiehens · 30/10/2025 11:33

This Labour government got in by lying and now are pushing their real agenda. They look more like a third world country government. They do not even pay their own taxes or abide by the rules. Reeves now pretending she was not aware of the rental license she needed. Only fools or commies will side with them.

kirinm · 30/10/2025 11:33

Elbowpatch · 30/10/2025 11:00

If you are paying a lot of tax already you must be earning a lot of money, so can afford to pay more tax.

Increasing the higher rate and leaving the basic rate alone would be fairer.

Nonsense. I don’t have thousands of pounds left at the end of the month. I have outgoings which aren’t suddenly going to decrease if tax goes up.

But so I want a functioning society with decent schools and healthcare that is accessible? Yes I do. Will this mean I have less money available to pay my mortgage and bills. Yes it will and that does worry me.

MO0N · 30/10/2025 11:33

Another76543 · 30/10/2025 11:19

Not all net contributors will keep working uncomplainingly to pay for people who don't.

Exactly this. The number of net contributors is falling and simply isn’t sustainable. Many of the net contributors have simply had enough.

These net contributors, the well-paid, are being subsidized by the people who do essential and often unpleasant work for low wages.

FilletSteakForBreakfast · 30/10/2025 11:34

Another76543 · 30/10/2025 11:26

I wouldn’t be against looking at the triple lock, but politicians don’t seem to want to do this.

They are 'hitting' pensions and pensioners though. Perhaps not via the triple lock but in other ways ie changing tax relief on pensions, changing the tax free lump sum, including pensions in estates for IHT.

Not saying I don't agree with these changes by the way. I'm just making the point that old people are being hit too just in more indirect ways perhaps.

Also by virtue of the fact that personal tax allowances are frozen more and more of us including pensioners will pay more tax each year.

I'm not a pensioner by the way nor entitled to any pensions yet.

Dragonscaledaisy · 30/10/2025 11:34

EasternStandard · 30/10/2025 10:55

Or maybe someone who remembers this

Labour's manifesto is, "fully funded and fully costed - no ifs, no ands, no buts… no additional tax rises."

"I have been very clear that every policy we announce, and every line in our manifesto, will be fully costed and fully funded."

“Nothing in our plans requires any additional tax to be increased.”

“We’ve got the Office for Budget Responsibility now… You don’t need to win an election to find out [about the public finances].”

“I don’t believe that fiddling around with tax rates is the best way to grow the economy.”

Labour has already accepted they'll only have a single-term in office so none of that matters to them.

Bluegrassdfly · 30/10/2025 11:35

dressinggowns · 30/10/2025 11:11

If people have less money they can’t pay more and housing costs will drop.

I expect housing welfare costs will increase, that's a much larger portion of our spending vs other countries.

Why would landlords reduce rents?

Yes in theory landlords would reduce rents because potential renters couldn’t afford more as they pay less tax, but where I am there’s about 50 people going for each rental property that comes on the market so it’s a mute point. We need to build more housing!

Another76543 · 30/10/2025 11:35

H202too · 30/10/2025 11:22

we already pay enough tax. I am not against it as it stands. The wealth divide is so much. Everyone seems terrified of this. I don't mean middle England.

we already pay enough tax.

The average person pays less tax in the UK than most other European and OECD countries.

Dragonscaledaisy · 30/10/2025 11:35

MO0N · 30/10/2025 11:33

These net contributors, the well-paid, are being subsidized by the people who do essential and often unpleasant work for low wages.

How are they being 'subsidised'?

EasternStandard · 30/10/2025 11:36

Dragonscaledaisy · 30/10/2025 11:34

Labour has already accepted they'll only have a single-term in office so none of that matters to them.

I guess so. It’s the getting through the rest of it that will be bad.

dressinggowns · 30/10/2025 11:37

We need to build more housing!

yep

Dragonscaledaisy · 30/10/2025 11:38

Bluegrassdfly · 30/10/2025 11:01

Think what you like about Rachel Reeves but her tax raiding stance is loved by the bond markets which drops the interest rate on gilts (government borrowing) which saves the country billions and billions.

And yet she's wasting £40 billion on quantitative tightening. I would say she's a fool and the ever increasing black hole in the economy is entirely the consequences of her actions.

Biker47 · 30/10/2025 11:39

MO0N · 30/10/2025 11:33

These net contributors, the well-paid, are being subsidized by the people who do essential and often unpleasant work for low wages.

That's a strange point to try and make, I pay 5 times the income tax and national insurance contributions of someone on full time minimum wage, that money comes off my wage slip, to then be funnelled to the person on minimum wage in the forms of working tax credits and other forms of benefits I am ineligible to receive, so how exactly am I being subsidised?

EasternStandard · 30/10/2025 11:39

Dragonscaledaisy · 30/10/2025 11:38

And yet she's wasting £40 billion on quantitative tightening. I would say she's a fool and the ever increasing black hole in the economy is entirely the consequences of her actions.

Edited

Yep. Barclays is forecasting that Reeves will be looking for £41bn in tax rises in the budget, up from their prediction of £26.5bn in September.

Another76543 · 30/10/2025 11:40

FilletSteakForBreakfast · 30/10/2025 11:34

They are 'hitting' pensions and pensioners though. Perhaps not via the triple lock but in other ways ie changing tax relief on pensions, changing the tax free lump sum, including pensions in estates for IHT.

Not saying I don't agree with these changes by the way. I'm just making the point that old people are being hit too just in more indirect ways perhaps.

Also by virtue of the fact that personal tax allowances are frozen more and more of us including pensioners will pay more tax each year.

I'm not a pensioner by the way nor entitled to any pensions yet.

I agree. My comment was in response to someone commenting on the cost of the triple lock. There are too many trying to say that tax should increase, but that those increases shouldn’t apply to them. I believe that the more sensible approach is to increase tax a small amount for the majority of the population. It would raise much more than trying to tax only certain groups of people.

LuckyBluePhoton · 30/10/2025 11:42

LOTS & LOTS of HM Treasury Money went missing on
HS2 to Birmingham and Crossrail /TFL with the
rest of GB plc getting old and creaking

Not much News and few ideas about Tax Avoidance & Tax Evasion
from the BIG or new Political Parties

The Buy-To-Let sector has escaped proper / realistic Taxation since 2000

EasternStandard · 30/10/2025 11:42

Another76543 · 30/10/2025 11:35

we already pay enough tax.

The average person pays less tax in the UK than most other European and OECD countries.

I bet we don’t have more money left though. Plus we’re at highest taxes for 70 odd years

FilletSteakForBreakfast · 30/10/2025 11:43

Fairyliz · 30/10/2025 11:31

I can’t imagine it will go towards improving services, surely it will be used to service the ever increasing national debt?

She needs to raise income and cut costs.

With this 'extra money' she needs to pay down the debt as well as grow the economy. Our interest rates on bonds will fall if she makes these good decisions which in turn helps us get rid of the debt/get out of the hole.

Both these things are the way out of the mess.

She also needs to use existing spending in a better way. So get rid of benefits for anxiety say and give us more frontline police. Get rid of illegal immigration say and use it for NHS improvements.

Another76543 · 30/10/2025 11:44

EasternStandard · 30/10/2025 11:39

Yep. Barclays is forecasting that Reeves will be looking for £41bn in tax rises in the budget, up from their prediction of £26.5bn in September.

Very strange, especially as their manifesto was “fully costed” and wouldn’t need tax rises. Then last year’s tax increases were a “once in a generation” event and we wouldn’t need any more.

Reeves said, according to the BBC, “But this is the Budget that is needed to wipe the slate clean and to put our public finances on a firm trajectory." What’s happened since then? Either they originally miscalculated, or the country’s finance have worsened further under their leadership.

caringcarer · 30/10/2025 11:46

If we all end up paying additional income tax the only people who will get better services are the illegal immigrants. KS is taking money from disabled people to hand to the illegals. In France they are given a bed in a dorm whereas in the UK they get put into 4* hotels. The hotel in my town houses them. I can't wait to get rid of this useless law breaking government and Reform will take us out of ECHR and as they arrive send them back and ban them from receiving public money. It would stop innocent people being sexually assaulted too.

WinterIsReallyComing · 30/10/2025 11:46

I am sure we'd all be happy to pay a bit more tax if we knew that it would improve our services. It seems clearer than ever that this is never going to happen though.

As the rich get richer and have access to the best of everything, the rest of us pay more and more for less. We have to fight for basic healthcare and accept that our children will not receive a consistently good education. Many of us are tired of working exceptionally hard for crumbs. I don't know what the answer is - I have no faith in any party that would stand a chance of being elected.

mindkey · 30/10/2025 11:47

Fairyliz · 30/10/2025 11:31

I can’t imagine it will go towards improving services, surely it will be used to service the ever increasing national debt?

It will go to financing the increasing number of people who don’t work.

Genevieva · 30/10/2025 11:48

H202too · 30/10/2025 10:19

I mean if things actually improved I think most people would be on board. I can't see Health and education, utilities improving though.

Would love to be wrong.

I’m not sure they would be. People are on their knees with increasing bills for council tax, energy and groceries and stagnating wages. What sounds like a small amount (only 2%) is actually 10%+ of people’s take home pay after paying unavoidable bills like utilities. It is the money they once put in a savings pot for a deposit on a first house or summer holiday. Other people are already at the point where they have nothing left after paying the mortgage, utilities and groceries. This will push them into a zone where they depend on food banks. It will increase suicide rates and it will almost certainly shrink the economy.

MO0N · 30/10/2025 11:48

Dragonscaledaisy · 30/10/2025 11:35

How are they being 'subsidised'?

The wealthy are only wealthy because they are able to exploit those beneath them.

EasternStandard · 30/10/2025 11:49

Another76543 · 30/10/2025 11:44

Very strange, especially as their manifesto was “fully costed” and wouldn’t need tax rises. Then last year’s tax increases were a “once in a generation” event and we wouldn’t need any more.

Reeves said, according to the BBC, “But this is the Budget that is needed to wipe the slate clean and to put our public finances on a firm trajectory." What’s happened since then? Either they originally miscalculated, or the country’s finance have worsened further under their leadership.

I think they got it so wrong at the last budget and won’t be able to patch it up with more taxes.

DorotheaDiamond · 30/10/2025 11:52

dressinggowns · 30/10/2025 11:12

I think they are talking about getting rid of the tax free lump sum for pensions or at least changing it. I've read lots of people over 55 are hurrying to take out their tax free lump sums before the rules change.

I know people doing this, and they all have excellent final salary pensions.

Yep DH has taken his 25% before they drop it!

Swipe left for the next trending thread