Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Civil Service internship. Only children of the "working class"

1000 replies

Quirkswork · 01/08/2025 11:02

If your child is coming up for 14 and interested in a career in the Civil Service and you have a job in a profession or that means you pay a lot of tax, I suggest you down tools now.

As reported in the Telegraph,

Civil Service internships will only be offered to students from lower income families in a bid to make Whitehall more working class, ministers have announced.

Only young people from “lower socio-economic backgrounds” will be able to apply to Whitehall’s internship programme, the Cabinet Office has said.

A student will be judged eligible depending on what jobs their parents did when they were 14. Students with parents who are receptionists, electricians, plumbers, butchers or van drivers would be among those eligible for the programme.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
Schnozze · 01/08/2025 16:31

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 16:25

?? sorry must have missed this, what is this in response to?
Is this a definition of working class?
Your parents have semi skilled (or below ) job, earn less than £26j (to qualify for fsm) and no one in your family has been to university.

That’s a definition we can work with, I bet there’s a lot of people on this thread didn’t realise they were middle class. I don’t actually have an issue with a scheme aimed at those people to be honest.

You've got to earn less than 7k to qualify for fsm. The real life hack is temporarily quitting your job just before the kids start school, ensuring 7 years of free meals and 16 free days of holiday camp every summer (which cost everyone else about£40 a day) .

You're welcome mumsnet 🤗

And finding out your children will be able to sob story about it years later and get onto some good schemes? This shit really has no downsides

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 16:31

Didimum · 01/08/2025 16:27

If something is an advantage over another, it’s a privilege. It’s as simple as they. That’s the objective measure of it.

?

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 16:33

Schnozze · 01/08/2025 16:31

You've got to earn less than 7k to qualify for fsm. The real life hack is temporarily quitting your job just before the kids start school, ensuring 7 years of free meals and 16 free days of holiday camp every summer (which cost everyone else about£40 a day) .

You're welcome mumsnet 🤗

And finding out your children will be able to sob story about it years later and get onto some good schemes? This shit really has no downsides

Yes but what did your parents do for a living when you were 14?

Browniesforbreakfast · 01/08/2025 16:33

Didimum · 01/08/2025 15:40

The child of the receptionist is still financially disadvantaged. Financial disadvantage leads to myriad more disadvantages.

Being a child of a receptionist might mean they are financial disadvantaged but only if you ignore other potential sources of income. If financial disadvantaged is the question then it should be based on finance not employment.

SurferRona · 01/08/2025 16:36

I’m a civil servant. Working class background. Both parents were economic migrants into England and both left education at 14. Both worked manual low skilled jobs. I got loads of qualifications (education then a steady job was all!) and am now working, via a longer circuitous route, in Whitehall. I routinely get awards and recognition because I am very good at what I do. And this is desperately needed, too many people around me are making policy without any real insight into the issues facing most of the population.

Interestingly, I also taught for a while at an RG university. All students needed 4xAs to be there. But oh my goodness was there a difference between comprehensively taught vs private school taught students. The latter had the confidence but the former had the stronger natural intelligence and aptitude. The latter had been hothoused to pass exams but were inferior in many ways. I see that now played out in central government. This will hopefully get us a more diverse and frankly an improved civil service with better brighter people working in it.

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 16:37

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 01/08/2025 16:26

Look, I'm in a totally different sector, but at work recently I've been quite down, because all the other people on my project group at work are two decades different in age to me, and of a different sex/background/technical education to them.

My ideas and contributions have been routinely shot down in advance of talking to the expensive and experienced consultancy brought in to fix the problem.

And the consultant thought I was bloody brilliant. I'm not the only one of value - but I DO have something individual to offer that is in part BECAUSE I don't fit the narrow definitions of "suitability" that the other project staff all do.

I've run major government contracts successfully, and it was because I dug into differences that made previous attempts fail - you can't problem solve for something as complex as a country without a detailed understanding of it's people.

So if you want an effective civil service, it needs to be diverse as a quality in itself.

Do you think narrowing down internships to people whose parents had a specific list of jobs when the candidate was 14 will encourage diversity?

Didimum · 01/08/2025 16:38

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 15:55

It’s not a gotcha. You said the civil service is made up of upper middle class, I asked you to define class in a measurable way. You can’t because it’s totally subjective as you’ve admitted, in rather a grumpy way. We’re agreeing here 😀

Of course class isn’t subjective. Just because it hasn’t been formally defined, it doesn’t mean it’s not objectively measurable.

Class is based on measurable material conditions: Income, wealth (assets minus debts), occupation, educational attainment, access to resources (healthcare, housing, social mobility). A person earning £25k a year with no savings is working class by most economic standards, even if they identify differently.

We can't base class analysis on how people feel about their class status. It skews policy, understanding and political discourse.

Schnozze · 01/08/2025 16:38

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 16:33

Yes but what did your parents do for a living when you were 14?

I don't remember what my dad did and my mother was just my mother.

I'm just saying there's nothing stopping one just lying about what their parents did.
Same way you can just temporarily quit your job for three months before the kids start primary school and get seven years of free school lunches out of it.

You can also just lie about being mixed race, a very ambiguous term who's going to prove I'm not 10% Chinese?

Hate the game not the player

Looploop · 01/08/2025 16:38

If there are really university students who have no idea what is done in an office or what the civil service does then maybe they should do some research! There is ample information available. Or maybe PSHE should teach it?

cardibach · 01/08/2025 16:42

SerendipityJane · 01/08/2025 16:28

Those are, of course, only applicable to people whose parent(s) are from the UK.

Two of them would work for people from overseas wouldn’t they?

Didimum · 01/08/2025 16:42

Browniesforbreakfast · 01/08/2025 16:33

Being a child of a receptionist might mean they are financial disadvantaged but only if you ignore other potential sources of income. If financial disadvantaged is the question then it should be based on finance not employment.

It doesn’t matter because by occupation of the highest earner, they will still significantly gather more working class applicants, regardless of other income streams.

Drfosters · 01/08/2025 16:43

Didimum · 01/08/2025 16:38

Of course class isn’t subjective. Just because it hasn’t been formally defined, it doesn’t mean it’s not objectively measurable.

Class is based on measurable material conditions: Income, wealth (assets minus debts), occupation, educational attainment, access to resources (healthcare, housing, social mobility). A person earning £25k a year with no savings is working class by most economic standards, even if they identify differently.

We can't base class analysis on how people feel about their class status. It skews policy, understanding and political discourse.

But that isn’t, in practise, how class is defined at all so it is now a completely meaningless term in modern society.

the idea that most graduates in the UK (earning less than 25k, no savings) is WC is not true in practise. the majorly of people who were born WC seem to stick to the moniker for their whole life even if it is clear they aren’t WC anymore (Angela Raynor is a prime example of someone who was WC but clearly isn’t anymore)

SerendipityJane · 01/08/2025 16:44

cardibach · 01/08/2025 16:42

Two of them would work for people from overseas wouldn’t they?

Which two ?

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 16:44

Didimum · 01/08/2025 16:38

Of course class isn’t subjective. Just because it hasn’t been formally defined, it doesn’t mean it’s not objectively measurable.

Class is based on measurable material conditions: Income, wealth (assets minus debts), occupation, educational attainment, access to resources (healthcare, housing, social mobility). A person earning £25k a year with no savings is working class by most economic standards, even if they identify differently.

We can't base class analysis on how people feel about their class status. It skews policy, understanding and political discourse.

But how do you objectively measure it? It’s not a trick question. Are you saying that earning below £25k and no savings makes you working class but some savings and a salary of £30k makes you middle class?

Agree on your other point , I also don’t think we should base class around how people feel about other peoples class status.

cardibach · 01/08/2025 16:45

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 16:37

Do you think narrowing down internships to people whose parents had a specific list of jobs when the candidate was 14 will encourage diversity?

Narrowing down application to 200 internships via one scheme when others exist?
Yes, it’ll encourage diversity because those 200 will be chosen to be people who wouldn’t normally go this route. It won’t reduce it as you imply because there are so many other routes, via internships and otherwise.

Oasisagiger · 01/08/2025 16:46

Good - there needs to be more social mobility.

cardibach · 01/08/2025 16:46

SerendipityJane · 01/08/2025 16:44

Which two ?

Manual occupation of parent and being in the first generation to attend university.

cardibach · 01/08/2025 16:47

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 16:44

But how do you objectively measure it? It’s not a trick question. Are you saying that earning below £25k and no savings makes you working class but some savings and a salary of £30k makes you middle class?

Agree on your other point , I also don’t think we should base class around how people feel about other peoples class status.

Edited

No. Because it’s not just salary. Look at the list.

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 16:48

cardibach · 01/08/2025 16:45

Narrowing down application to 200 internships via one scheme when others exist?
Yes, it’ll encourage diversity because those 200 will be chosen to be people who wouldn’t normally go this route. It won’t reduce it as you imply because there are so many other routes, via internships and otherwise.

It’s for all internships, others don’t exist. The main criteria is based on a narrow band of occupations that your parents had when you were 14, there’s nothing remotely diverse about that .

TorroFerney · 01/08/2025 16:49

Quirkswork · 01/08/2025 11:22

I am reading them and completely disagree with them, Im afraid. I don't think social engineering is a good thing at all. I'd quite like competent civil servants though.

And how will this make them less competent? Higher earner and middle class people have more social connections that could help their child secure an internship and potentially people at home who can help with writing letters and filling in forms. Surely you can see that. Do you really begrudge giving kids opportunities?

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 16:49

cardibach · 01/08/2025 16:47

No. Because it’s not just salary. Look at the list.

There’s no list in the quote I’m responding to.

Ted27 · 01/08/2025 16:50

@Looploop

Actually I think that people generally don't know what the civil service does.
Its not all Whitehall.

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 16:51

TorroFerney · 01/08/2025 16:49

And how will this make them less competent? Higher earner and middle class people have more social connections that could help their child secure an internship and potentially people at home who can help with writing letters and filling in forms. Surely you can see that. Do you really begrudge giving kids opportunities?

Do you really begrudge giving kids opportunities?

Do you really support taking opportunities away from kids based on what job their parents had when they were 14??

cardibach · 01/08/2025 16:54

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 16:48

It’s for all internships, others don’t exist. The main criteria is based on a narrow band of occupations that your parents had when you were 14, there’s nothing remotely diverse about that .

Nope. It’s for one 200 place internship scheme. I’ve put links to some others (some for other disadvantaged groups, some open to all) earlier on the thread.

cardibach · 01/08/2025 16:55

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 16:49

There’s no list in the quote I’m responding to.

Yes there is. This list.
Class is based on measurable material conditions: Income, wealth (assets minus debts), occupation, educational attainment, access to resources (healthcare, housing, social mobility).

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread