Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Civil Service internship. Only children of the "working class"

1000 replies

Quirkswork · 01/08/2025 11:02

If your child is coming up for 14 and interested in a career in the Civil Service and you have a job in a profession or that means you pay a lot of tax, I suggest you down tools now.

As reported in the Telegraph,

Civil Service internships will only be offered to students from lower income families in a bid to make Whitehall more working class, ministers have announced.

Only young people from “lower socio-economic backgrounds” will be able to apply to Whitehall’s internship programme, the Cabinet Office has said.

A student will be judged eligible depending on what jobs their parents did when they were 14. Students with parents who are receptionists, electricians, plumbers, butchers or van drivers would be among those eligible for the programme.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
Drfosters · 01/08/2025 15:39

cardibach · 01/08/2025 15:33

Why wouldn’t they be able to follow in their footsteps? This doesn’t ban people from applying to, or getting a job in, the CS. Don’t be dramatic.

then what is the point of this internship then if the Working class children can just apply for the roles to start with?
I might be middle class but I wouldn’t have any idea myself what working in the civil service entails and neither would my children.

Didimum · 01/08/2025 15:40

Quirkswork · 01/08/2025 11:56

No. I think disabled people need particular care in society.

You can't judge every child's advantages or disadvantages. You might have a child of a receptionist (on the list) who has had a happy loving home life with parents who give a shit. And you might have the child of an accountant from a violent home. Yet that latter child isn't allowed to hope to get on an internship scheme. It seems very arbitrary.

The child of the receptionist is still financially disadvantaged. Financial disadvantage leads to myriad more disadvantages.

needtostopnamechanging · 01/08/2025 15:40

Children who are disadvantaged in life will get a small boost to help even the playing field - seems right. They have looked at the data and seen children’s class still matters after they leave uni. It will enable them to learn some of the things your children learn from private schools or the best state schools ( which tend to be in expensive areas)

you want to identify as working class to get the boost for your child? How do you feel if someone incorrectly identified as black or female to get other such support?

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 15:41

Outside9 · 01/08/2025 15:36

Your assumption is based on one, when I've already made clear wealth, income, status etc are a few out of a host factors.

If you grew up with wealthy parents in a wealthy suburban area, attended private school and a Russell Group university. Clearly you would not consider yourself working class because your income was zero once you graduated uni.

Yes I’ve asked for measurable criteria of these factors. My example of salary was to help you understand what I‘m asking.

It appears to me that you are unable to define class using criteria that are independent of individual opinions or biases.

Didimum · 01/08/2025 15:41

Drfosters · 01/08/2025 15:39

then what is the point of this internship then if the Working class children can just apply for the roles to start with?
I might be middle class but I wouldn’t have any idea myself what working in the civil service entails and neither would my children.

Because candidates with better grades from more affluent areas and universities are significantly more likely to succeed via the usual application routes. Disadvantaged young people aren’t.

Browniesforbreakfast · 01/08/2025 15:42

Can you also descend class? for example you lost your job

I know a very poverty stricken upper class lady. Definitely upper class even though she barely has a penny to her name.

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 15:42

needtostopnamechanging · 01/08/2025 15:40

Children who are disadvantaged in life will get a small boost to help even the playing field - seems right. They have looked at the data and seen children’s class still matters after they leave uni. It will enable them to learn some of the things your children learn from private schools or the best state schools ( which tend to be in expensive areas)

you want to identify as working class to get the boost for your child? How do you feel if someone incorrectly identified as black or female to get other such support?

How are you defining working class?

cardibach · 01/08/2025 15:42

I’m not sure why so many poster seem to think this means the CS or the government think being a professional/middle class is bad. This is just a way to encourage a few less advantaged people to consider the CS as a career.
This isn’t the only such scheme. Here are a few more (not exhaustive, 5 min google search), so no need to worry about middle class erasure:
https://careers.homeoffice.gov.uk/internships
https://careers.homeoffice.gov.uk/early-talent
https://www.civil-service-careers.gov.uk/cma-internships-at-the-cma/
https://www.gchq-careers.co.uk/our-careers/early-careers/summer-placements.html

CMA – Internships at the CMA

Discover rewarding careers in government - the Civil Service offers an inclusive and innovative workplace, flexible working, and opportunities for growth.

https://www.civil-service-careers.gov.uk/cma-internships-at-the-cma

ruethewhirl · 01/08/2025 15:43

Haven't read all the details on this yet, but my initial thought is how clueless and out of touch are they, to think an unpaid placement is an option many people from this demographic will even be able to afford to take up in the first place?!

(And before anyone snarls at me re 'this demographic', I'm drawing directly from my own background and experiences in forming my opinion.)

Littleredridingoodie · 01/08/2025 15:43

Looploop · 01/08/2025 15:15

So working parents bad, unless working in a particular range of trades? And then they must be bad at it because most plumbers or electricians wouldn’t qualify for FSM?

I’m not sure how these criteria make ‘working parents bad’?

these criteria are criteria I have seen before. You don’t have to meet them all, just one or more. As I said, I’m not sure exactly what the application process is for this particular scheme however I’ve shared this so people saying you can’t define class or legitimate eligibility criteria can see an example of how this is done.

re: 50% of people going to uni and schemes like this becoming defunct. Yes, that is the point. The schemes aren’t there forever, they are there to address an imbalance. And that imbalance will have had to be demonstrated to actually exist at an organisational
level otherwise this scheme would be illegal. When no one qualifies, that is something to celebrate. I believe this scheme may be replacing some of the efforts to encourage non-white applicants. If that is the case and multiple ethnicities are now represented, this is a good thing.

Didimum · 01/08/2025 15:43

Quirkswork · 01/08/2025 11:58

Why disgusting? To want every child to be treated as an individual? What's wrong with that?

If you think people are treated as individuals on mass at application stage, without or without a socially engineered internship, then you’re deluded.

Browniesforbreakfast · 01/08/2025 15:44

sunshineside · 01/08/2025 15:34

by the way they’ve been doing this for years. The last few times I’ve been job hunting (2024 and 2020) I’ve been asked on applications what my parents did for a living at 14, whether I received free school meals and what kind of secondary school I went to.

Absolutely nothing wrong with it, stop whinging.

That might explain the parlous state of the country then.

Didimum · 01/08/2025 15:45

ruethewhirl · 01/08/2025 15:43

Haven't read all the details on this yet, but my initial thought is how clueless and out of touch are they, to think an unpaid placement is an option many people from this demographic will even be able to afford to take up in the first place?!

(And before anyone snarls at me re 'this demographic', I'm drawing directly from my own background and experiences in forming my opinion.)

The internship placements are paid. The fast-stream summer internship this summer paid £430 a week.

cardibach · 01/08/2025 15:46

Drfosters · 01/08/2025 15:39

then what is the point of this internship then if the Working class children can just apply for the roles to start with?
I might be middle class but I wouldn’t have any idea myself what working in the civil service entails and neither would my children.

Have you read the thread? Or thought about it for a second?
Many (not all) the young people at whom the scheme is aimed will have no idea what the CS does, what office work is like, or that it’s even a possibility for ‘someone like them’. It gives them an opportunity to see if it’s suitable. And yes, it gives them a bit of an advantage in applying should they so decide, to set against the advantages in terms of cultural capital etc that some (not all) middle class young people have.

ruethewhirl · 01/08/2025 15:47

Didimum · 01/08/2025 15:45

The internship placements are paid. The fast-stream summer internship this summer paid £430 a week.

That makes more sense, thanks for the info.

carpool · 01/08/2025 15:47

I can see the point of the principle of this but how exactly are they going to decide who is working class or otherwise? For example child of divorced parents - mum works as part time receptionist or a TA or similar but dad has a professional job. Children live with mum - are they working class or middle class?

Littleredridingoodie · 01/08/2025 15:49

@NaicePeachJoker

  • parental occupation (skilled manual &below)
  • FSM (received)
  • first gen uni
  • non-selective state school
these are actual criteria I have seen before. Candidates meeting one or more criteria are encouraged to apply and may also be guaranteed an interview. Caveat here, I’m not talking about the civil service scheme here, just sharing an example. I would have qualified (rightly); my child would not qualify (rightly).
Didimum · 01/08/2025 15:50

Quirkswork · 01/08/2025 12:10

No. I do think it needs changing. There's been a lot of accusations on this thread that don't represent what I think at all.

My children wouldn't qualify and would have no interest in the civil service anyway, so I'm not arguing for my own benefit. I'm not denying that I am privileged compared to many and I am thankful. I support the aim of poor working class getting a leg up. White working class boys are at the bottom of the rung and I see that, living where I do.

I however don't think this should be at the expense of any other child. That's all. Id just like a decent civil service based on employing the best person for the job. Surely this is a debate that can be had without me being called..what was it...a "racist troll".

Jesus Christ, OP. They demonstrate that they can be the best person for the job THROUGH THE INTERNSHIP which they would be less likely to get a placement on without the working class scheme because they are automatically more disadvantaged. Gosh, it must be crippling in life to be this dense.

Outside9 · 01/08/2025 15:50

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 15:41

Yes I’ve asked for measurable criteria of these factors. My example of salary was to help you understand what I‘m asking.

It appears to me that you are unable to define class using criteria that are independent of individual opinions or biases.

Your "gotcha" point is that you can't measure class therefore it is not real, is not as compelling as you clearly believe it is. Especially when there are endless social categorical definitions that can never be measured. Culture, race, identity, everything can be made abstract.

In actuality your questions, while they attempt to feign an air intellectual superiority, reveal your commitment to obtusity.

SerendipityJane · 01/08/2025 15:50

Schnozze · 01/08/2025 15:37

Intelligent parents will temporarily job change when their child is 14.

Best thing I ever did was take a sabbatical just before mine started primary school now they get free lunch every day until they leave primary and loads of free fun summer camps. Thank me later 😉

Intelligent parents will temporarily job change when their child is 14.

Or the candidate just makes shit up.

Sorry, I can't understand why people are so worked up about this when the actual predicate is impossible to (a) define and (b) police.

Make me prove what my parents did (or did not) do when I was growing up.

Quirkswork · 01/08/2025 15:50

Quirkswork · 01/08/2025 12:45

Well, I've said what I think so will leave it at that. Some very interesting posts despite most I think disagreeing with me. Food for thought and, despite being a "racist troll", with each child of mine possessing both a horse and a car apparently, do see the argument that some people have made as being valid. I think my view is also valid. Things are never black and white (in my view of course). That's the great thing about being able to have a discussion.

Just in case people are still replying to me personally. I don't want to waste anyone's time as I haven't read their replies. Apologies.

OP posts:
NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 15:51

Browniesforbreakfast · 01/08/2025 15:44

That might explain the parlous state of the country then.

When I’m recruiting, the single most important factor I base my hiring decision on is what a candidate’s parents did for a job when the candidate was 14. If they satisfy this then I look at competence, qualifications, experience etc

cardibach · 01/08/2025 15:51

NaicePeachJoker · 01/08/2025 15:41

Yes I’ve asked for measurable criteria of these factors. My example of salary was to help you understand what I‘m asking.

It appears to me that you are unable to define class using criteria that are independent of individual opinions or biases.

@Littleredridingoodie offered these a few pages back. All measurable.

  • parental occupation (skilled manual &below)
  • FSM (received)
  • first gen uni
  • non-selective state school
Are they a perfect indicator? Probably not. But they get to the group intended and then selection can happen from there. It’s not a case of everyone eligible can do it. There are limited numbers.
August3r · 01/08/2025 15:54

It really does show how out of touch this government is. Going by the graph on the BBC article the intermediate socio economic group is the lowest represented in the civil service any way which this will make worse.

Would love to know how they get reliable evidence of family profession at 14. You could say anything .

Schnozze · 01/08/2025 15:54

needtostopnamechanging · 01/08/2025 15:40

Children who are disadvantaged in life will get a small boost to help even the playing field - seems right. They have looked at the data and seen children’s class still matters after they leave uni. It will enable them to learn some of the things your children learn from private schools or the best state schools ( which tend to be in expensive areas)

you want to identify as working class to get the boost for your child? How do you feel if someone incorrectly identified as black or female to get other such support?

I'll keep identifying as whatever I like it's 2025 I lied about being mixed race and bisexual and got a job I'm unqualified for (I'd like to see them prove I'm not)

Already got my kids free lunch at school for the whole of primary school and free summer camps by temporarily quitting my job just before they started primary school.

Hate the game not the player

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.