Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel disappointed after reading this in The Observer about the author and her husband from The Salt Path book and film?

1000 replies

DisappointedReader · 06/07/2025 02:04

The real Salt Path: how the couple behind a bestseller le...

I read Raynor Winn's book The Salt Path and her other two books. I was looking forward to seeing the film at some point and to reading her next book. I felt sorry to read about the challenges the couple had faced, especially with regard to losing their family home and with Moth's health. Now, having read the article in today's Observer, I feel a bit stunned and am not sure what to think.

The real Salt Path: how the couple behind a bestseller le...

The real Salt Path: how the couple behind a bestseller le...

Penniless and homeless, the Winns found fame and fortune with the story of their 630-mile walk to salvation. We can reveal it was far from the truth

https://observer.co.uk/news/national/article/the-real-salt-path-how-the-couple-behind-a-bestseller-left-a-trail-of-debt-and-deceit

OP posts:
Thread gallery
31
FancyBiscuitsLevel · 06/07/2025 09:34

Another one who read it in their book club (seriously was it just book clubs that drove the sales?!) and thought the legal side was obviously not 100% honest. The scale of it though!

and they had a property in france so always had somewhere else to go /an asset they could have sold to help towards their debts.

Tedsshed · 06/07/2025 09:34

I read it for a Book Group and as soon as I read the fudged 'we made a bad investment and lost our home' bit in the opening pages, and it was never referred to again, I had a very strong gut feeling that I was in the hands of a grifter. I wouldn't have been at all surprised to find that the whole thing was invented. The book has a plaintive whine of victimhood and I hated it. Unfortunately everyone else in the book group loved it and thought I was horrible for refusing to believe the story. Glad to be vindicated!

AWanderingFool · 06/07/2025 09:35

MikeRafone · 06/07/2025 09:31

I read this book a few years ago, I found it rather depressing, and have been in two minds as to whether to see the film. Friends have said its really good, but possibly they thought the book was good

I found the film an absolute snoozefest.

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 06/07/2025 09:35

I do hope that mechanic gets his money back!

jaws33 · 06/07/2025 09:36

@TwiceForLunch I have said it on here many times but there is a narrative that has sprung up that healthy eating/lifestyle means you won't get any chronic disease or cancers. I particularly see it in young people. I think a lot comes from BS on social media, it's dangerous.

diddl · 06/07/2025 09:36

She has supposedly made about 4mill from The Salt Path!

Will be up shit creek again if it needs paying back!

teksquad · 06/07/2025 09:36

I always thought this was bullshit. Ive walked a lot of the SW coast path and its full of people on expensive tours having their luggage moved from hotel to B and B on the way having expensive lunches and cream teas at NT places (which is fine, why I like it), not homeless people camping out.

AWanderingFool · 06/07/2025 09:37

diddl · 06/07/2025 09:36

She has supposedly made about 4mill from The Salt Path!

Will be up shit creek again if it needs paying back!

Well, now she can repay all the people she's stolen from!

burnoutbabe · 06/07/2025 09:38

rickyrickygrimes · 06/07/2025 05:24

Lots of things in the book didn’t make sense - and now they do. I enjoyed it - that sense of how precarious life can be, and the nature writing - but didn’t particularly like either of them, and can understand why now.

my book club are going to be very unhappy / vindicated - it was a real marmite read for us.

Yes I thought the same -can’t wait for next tines book club! I pointed out at the time that I hoped she’d repaid the people she stole from once she got the money from the book.

him applying for university whilst walking with just an old mobile seemed very unlikely having done an application a few years before and know how much stuff I had to dig out /write up.

SwetSwetSwet · 06/07/2025 09:38

Re the facts not emerging publicly before, I guess the unnamed relative who lent the money at 18% wouldn't have wanted to publicise that fact, as he also comes out badly.

Katypp · 06/07/2025 09:39

teksquad · 06/07/2025 09:36

I always thought this was bullshit. Ive walked a lot of the SW coast path and its full of people on expensive tours having their luggage moved from hotel to B and B on the way having expensive lunches and cream teas at NT places (which is fine, why I like it), not homeless people camping out.

We questioned that too, as the win for wild camping on Dartmoor was in the news at the time.
Again, we assumed on the basis that unless you are actually caught in the act, you will get away with it.

jaws33 · 06/07/2025 09:40

Re the facts not emerging publicly before, I guess the unnamed relative who lent the money at 18% wouldn't have wanted to publicise that fact, as he also comes out badly.

tbf who knows what they told him!

NetZeroZealot · 06/07/2025 09:40

The trouble is when one part of the story is found to be a lie, it’s hard to know how much of the rest is true.
i think they probably did the walk.
The biggest issue is “Moth’s” illness.
if that’s a lie it’s massive - and the only way he can prove it isn’t is by releasing his medical notes.

Echobelly · 06/07/2025 09:42

Yes, what a shame as the first book was a great read; I haven't read the others, and glad now. I was always a bit skeptical about Moth's apparent recovery, that seemed a bit odd 'wish fulfillment' to me, so I had wondered.

I suppose con artists are pretty creative people!

PatsyOhara · 06/07/2025 09:42

My brain is fried reading the article. Can't make head or tail of it. You lot have clearer thinking than me this morning. I've not had coffee yet. Maybe it's that ?!

faffadoodledo · 06/07/2025 09:44

PatsyOhara · 06/07/2025 09:42

My brain is fried reading the article. Can't make head or tail of it. You lot have clearer thinking than me this morning. I've not had coffee yet. Maybe it's that ?!

There’s a video at the end

NetZeroZealot · 06/07/2025 09:44

teksquad · 06/07/2025 09:36

I always thought this was bullshit. Ive walked a lot of the SW coast path and its full of people on expensive tours having their luggage moved from hotel to B and B on the way having expensive lunches and cream teas at NT places (which is fine, why I like it), not homeless people camping out.

Plenty of wild camping goes on there, my own family have done it. You would be less likely to come across it as they move on early in the day. And you wouldn’t know if they were doing it recreationally or were homeless.

AnnaMagnani · 06/07/2025 09:45

Tedsshed · 06/07/2025 09:34

I read it for a Book Group and as soon as I read the fudged 'we made a bad investment and lost our home' bit in the opening pages, and it was never referred to again, I had a very strong gut feeling that I was in the hands of a grifter. I wouldn't have been at all surprised to find that the whole thing was invented. The book has a plaintive whine of victimhood and I hated it. Unfortunately everyone else in the book group loved it and thought I was horrible for refusing to believe the story. Glad to be vindicated!

This is why I only lasted 4 sessions of book group.

Had a massive disagreement over a book which I thought was crap and everyone else loved.

Realised I was wasting my precious reading time on books I actively disliked and going to a group to be told I wasn't as kind/sensitive as the rest of the group.

Also being a doctor kind of ruins this sort of book. If diagnosed with an illness that primarily affects your ability to walk, how are you walking a coastal path or wild camping? Does the book ever mention him falling over/getting stuck more or less continuously?

LizzieSiddal · 06/07/2025 09:45

SwetSwetSwet · 06/07/2025 09:38

Re the facts not emerging publicly before, I guess the unnamed relative who lent the money at 18% wouldn't have wanted to publicise that fact, as he also comes out badly.

Well she was about to be charged with stealing £60K so maybe the relative felt a charge of 18% interest was a fair swop for not going to prison! Also it may not have been the first time this relative had to bale them out.

I suspect the relative didn’t come forward because they were family and didn’t want to be the ones who went to the press.

ThatCyanCat · 06/07/2025 09:47

EnidSpyton · 06/07/2025 09:09

Publishers don't have to do due diligence when it comes to memoirs and life writing.

There have to be fact checkers for non-fiction work in general to ensure accuracy of facts and data, but people telling their life stories are exempt from this because it's about their life, their memories, etc - and it's very difficult to fact check a subjective version of events.

Penguin therefore wouldn't be liable for anything here.

However, if she's sold this story to Penguin as being truth when it's actually largely fiction, this hugely damages its saleability and doesn't look good for Penguin. It being a 'true' story is what makes it compelling and is what has made it fly off the shelves. A brand has been created around her and the book based on it being a true story of survival against the odds, two ordinary people against the machine of capitalism, etc. Once it no longer fits that narrative, it's not going to be worth the paper it's printed on.

If the article turns out to be true - and we do have to remember that there are two sides to every story, some of the people on the opposing side are now dead, the article itself is quite vague and people's names are withheld so they can't be fact checked, and we don't have access to Moth's medical history - I would imagine Penguin would have to halt the publication of any new editions due to it no longer being the genre it claims to be.

I have to say I am a bit sceptical because it's been ten years since the first book was published, and surely if there were this much bullshit in the book, someone would have been paid a handsome sum by the Daily Mail for an exposé ages ago. Why have all these people stayed silent for so long?

I will watch with interest over the coming days to see if this gets picked up by any other news outlets and any more people from their past come out of the woodwork.

I suppose the film coming out brought it to a wider audience. And a lot of people probably didn't really know how to go about exposing them, or want to risk it when they have made so much from it and could take legal action. An investigative journalist approaching them makes it much easier to do.

Danceswithweasels · 06/07/2025 09:47

I read all three books and enjoyed them, it had special resonance as I was diagnosed with a neurological disease last year. I hadn't got as far as buying a tent but it sort of gave me a bit of hope. Sort of explains the incident when they get given a farm in the second book and somebody sprays the words "scum" all over it and puts glue in the locks. Raynor/Sally could think of why anyone would do that!

Radiatorvalves · 06/07/2025 09:47

highlandcoo · 06/07/2025 08:21

Really interesting article.

I didn't enjoy the book. I don't remember much about it apart from thinking it wasn't very well written and being really annoyed by them staying on a campsite without paying, and feeling very smug about it. There was a sense of entitlement that grated throughout.

For a more heartwarming story about survival against the odds, can I recommend Maurice and Marilyn by Sophie Elmhirst. It's a remarkable story about a couple adrift on a liferaft for 118 days.

Agree M&M is a really well written book. I went to a book reading by the author - she did lots of research but had never stepped foot on a yacht. Not sure about heartwarming? I wanted to kill Maurice myself at several points!

Kernowgal · 06/07/2025 09:48

teksquad · 06/07/2025 09:36

I always thought this was bullshit. Ive walked a lot of the SW coast path and its full of people on expensive tours having their luggage moved from hotel to B and B on the way having expensive lunches and cream teas at NT places (which is fine, why I like it), not homeless people camping out.

Plenty of people wild camp along the path, they’re just well hidden or they’re up and off very early.

YourAmplePlumPoster · 06/07/2025 09:48

I've just sent that to my friend who's a big fan of the book as she lives in Cornwall.

Silentstarsgoby · 06/07/2025 09:48

NetZeroZealot · 06/07/2025 08:44

He’s not an investigative journalist though. It takes months of painstaking research to find out the facts - and no one had any idea of the extent of the deception until the Observer broke the story.
The story has been accepted as genuine for over a decade.
How was an actor supposed to verify the facts? That’s not even their job.

This! I don't think we can blame Jason Isaacs when those who should have investigated further didn't- Penguin books and the film producers.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.