Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

October budget going to be painful

1000 replies

increasinglyconcerned · 27/08/2024 10:26

Here we go..... I knew it. Labour were promising not to hike our taxes in the election campaign and here we are.... apparently they discovered £22 billion black hole in his first weeks in the role and it's not his fault.

Let me guess, those of us who earn six figures and already pay 45% will pay EVEN more and take home even less. It's the hard workers who will take the brunt. What's the point in working anymore!

I earn a little over £120k and I'm taxed the same as those earrings £500k.

Before people jump in saying they don't feel sorry for me, I work full time to support my family, as of January I will have 2 DCs in nursery, plus my mortgage and get ZERO free hours childcare, whilst they keep promising free childcare but I just pay more for everyone else to benefit.

I cannot afford to pay more taxes to fix this country and especially when so many people are getting a free ride and not paying their way, ranging from millionaires with tax havens to those claiming benefits dishonestly.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Mulhollandmagoo · 27/08/2024 11:10

taxguru · 27/08/2024 10:41

What's the alternative?

How about reducing benefits and forcing those who can work into work, and part timers to work longer hours!

The answer can't forever always be to hit the workers.

We need workers and the government should put all efforts into getting people working, not hitting them with tax rises when they do.

Or taxing the ultra rich correctly? Clamp down on those who use creative accounting to keep their money hidden!

Cyclebabble · 27/08/2024 11:11

I am feeling nervous as to what Starmer and Reeves will go for next. Pensions seems likely as an area to hit, but I would not rule out more means testing on benefits, higher fuel taxes or other areas. We shall see.

SaulHudsonDavidJones · 27/08/2024 11:11

Catza · 27/08/2024 10:34

From what I hear, the proposed tax changes will affect capital gains and inheritance tax. Where does it say you will have to pay more income tax? That's right, nowhere.
"It's hard workers who will take the brunt"... oh, that old chestnut. Of course, me and my many colleagues in the NHS who are on sub 50k salary are lazy and are not working hard enough. Gotcha.
"I pay more for everyone else to benefit". Well, so do I. Among other things part of my taxes go on your children's education once they go to school and their healthcare. That's how society works.
You have a choice to stop working and try state support if you think it is going to make you better off.

Perfectly said. Just because people don't earn over 100k, doesn't mean they don't work hard!

SphinxOfBlackQuartz · 27/08/2024 11:11

Right now there seems to be a lot off uproar without any real facts.

Labour said they would not increase income tax so either they are going to go back on an election pledge or the talk of 50% tax rates is just gossip to whip up fear

The things there have been more serious rumours about...

  • equalising tax relief on pension contributions so higher tax payers don't get higher tax relief. This will hurt me personally but it's hard to think this isn't fair. Everyone should get equal relief, giving equal chance to save for their retirement.
  • Capital gains. Fair enough. If you've gained then you should be taxed as if it were income (imo) with similar tax bands.
  • Inheritence. Also fair enough (IMO) - even though it's unpopular. It's another one that may hit me one day but it it is another form of financial gain to recipients and should be taxed in line with income and CGT (imo).

And the winter fuel tax they' ve already said - which again seems somewhat reasonable considering the triple lock which last year more than made up the loss of the WFA.

None are ideal, of course, but all are things I can see the reasons why and accept.

Nw22 · 27/08/2024 11:11

@WitchyBits teachers do not earn a pittance. That’s total rubbish

Therightcoffee · 27/08/2024 11:12

I’m wondering 1) who had the good times, and when were they? Missed that - higher tax payers have paid tonnes more tax 2010 onwards per the IFS - so this higher earners should pay more is yet more divisive populism from Labour 2) how is this supposed to promote economic growth?

and 3) why the constant teasers - announce some tax rises and stop telling us we’re walking the plank soon.

Charlie2121 · 27/08/2024 11:12

CrimsonShades · 27/08/2024 11:04

Yeah, for sure. There is a minority of people who will decide that they prefer the balance of both working and earning less and will go part time or quit their jobs for lower paying roles.

You’re delusional if you think this will be widespread, however. The majority of those, like OP, who moan about there being no point in working and suggest they would be better off quitting their lucrative jobs for less well paid roles have no intention of ever actually doing this because despite their woe-is-me protestations they know fine well that they’re significantly better off continuing to work and enjoying the financial security of their fat salaries, even if they are forced against their will to contribute to society.

That’s simply not true. I work with a lot of well paid people and have never known so many choosing to negotiate 4 day working weeks, buying several weeks extra holiday etc.

People are fed up with ridiculously high marginal tax rates.

In some cases people actually end up with more money working 4 days than 5.

I’d be interested to know how many on here who appear to believe that 100k+ earners are bottomless tax cash cows would be happy to work an extra day every week for no pay?

Noname99 · 27/08/2024 11:12

CrimsonShades · 27/08/2024 10:45

Then why don’t you? Genuinely, I’m curious - why don’t you quit your job, take a much lower salary which places you in a lower tax bracket, and contribute less? What’s stopping you?

Oh I don’t know ….. how about pride, a sense of achievement, wanting to do well for oneself … all
things that are the complete opposite of the Labour ideology.

I’m genuinely amazed though at the surprise ….. tax those who do and hand outs to those that don’t is the labour mantra. All wrapped up in the usual bollocks of it’s just luck not hard work, ambition, risk taking and guts that gets you anywhere. If you are on a good salary, you are now the ATM
for everyone else so suck it up.

Therightcoffee · 27/08/2024 11:13

@SphinxOfBlackQuartz I completely disagree on pensions - public sector workers have 20-23 percent employer contributions. My private employer contributes 3 percent.

it will massively hit private sector higher rate tax payers. It would only be fair if people had similar rates of employer contributions. And even then, it discourages pension savings. So not great in the end for pensioner poverty.

Greenkindness · 27/08/2024 11:13

If you didn’t have your salary you probably wouldn’t have been able to buy a house and the security that brings. Good luck trying to buy a house in minimum wage and no windfall from anywhere else. Even renting is hard in those circumstances.

I also don’t think getting buy on benefits is as easy as you think.

EasternStandard · 27/08/2024 11:14

Kitkat1523 · 27/08/2024 10:54

But that’s the role you chose? I personally think it’s fine you getting taxed more….you earn more 🤷‍♀️
for me I’m looking forward to October….I get my nhs pay rise 🎉

Well of course you are and of course you do.

What a way to react as you have to those paying high tax since we all need it for the services

taxguru · 27/08/2024 11:14

@cosyleafcafe

If OP is earning just over £120k then she is not being taxed at 45%. She's being taxed at 40%.

Nope, her marginal tax rate on her wages between £100k and £120k will be a whopping 62% because of the tapering removal of her tax free personal allowance. She's also losing the tax free child care. So, yes, she's probably worse off at £120k than she'd have been earning only £99k.

That's why people earning between £100k and £125k should either pay the excess over £100k into pensions or reduce their hours to get back under £100k.

It's this kind of gross stupidity that RR and KS need to be tackling. They need to be thinking of ways to get people working more, rather than the typical Labour way of taxing them till the pips squeak. By the latter, it just means people work less, which is bad for the economy and increases the likes of waiting lists in the NHS when doctors work fewer hours to avoid these insane tax cliff edges and stupidly high marginal tax rates.

Bumpitybumper · 27/08/2024 11:14

Somepeoplearesnippy · 27/08/2024 11:01

The Conservatives bled the country dry whilst giving massive handouts and leg ups to their cronies. Now we are paying for it. It's naive to think that can be done without tax rises.

The British people have bled the country dry. Have you seen the statistics on worklessness and productivity? We are an aging population that is getting sicker mostly due to lifestyle factors. A quarter of our population is now disabled. We have huge and growing financial burdens and fewer and fewer people that are able and willing to be net contributors. This problem will only get worse and the Labour government has absolutely no answers.

AdviceNeeded2024 · 27/08/2024 11:14

increasinglyconcerned · 27/08/2024 10:39

You've missed my point, those earning less are very likely working incredibly hard but are paying less tax and wont be in the line of sight to pay more come October. There is this magical never ending pot of money for 6 figure earners apparently.

But they will still be worse off than you.

I understand your frustration that someone earning £300k a year more is in the same tax bracket. Same for those on £60k a year. So I completely get your point here and it is soul destroying seeing how much of your wage is taken away from you when you look at your pay slip.

I think you worded your opening post in a way that will rile people up, because there are a hell of a lot of low earners who work incredibly hard doing important jobs. And you must realise your wage does afford you a nice lifestyle that most couldn’t dream of, it just doesn’t come across like that in your post.

There are far too many very wealthy people who are allowed to dodge tax payments, there are too many loopholes to move money that are morally wrong, but not illegal. These are the people that should be taken to task. (And I am not saying that’s you OP clearly it isn’t but I think you’re directing some of your anger at the issue in the wrong place)

Demonhunter · 27/08/2024 11:14

You lost me at "The hard workers bear the brunt"

We could probably name 100 other occupations that work harder than you, and probably more essential to the running of soceity, for not even a quarter of your salary, so boohoo!

cosyleafcafe · 27/08/2024 11:14

increasinglyconcerned · 27/08/2024 11:10

@cosyleafcafe I said I'm paying 45% tax. That is what I am paying.

But you said are earning just over £120k. So how are you paying 45% tax?

If you're in the UK then you are paying 40% tax on anything below £125,140 and 45% on anything above that.

You said you earn just over £120k.

Even if you earn £129k, you can't possibly be paying 45% tax on more than a couple of thousand pounds of your income.

poppymango · 27/08/2024 11:15

The money has to come from somewhere. What were you expecting?

Oblahdeeoblahdoe · 27/08/2024 11:15

Don't you want decent public services? A working NHS? Decent schools? Funding for SEND children? Better housing? Or will you be paying privately for these?
I don't think they will be raising income tax btw. It will be capital gains tax, inheritance tax etc.

Margorett · 27/08/2024 11:15

increasinglyconcerned · 27/08/2024 10:35

I've only just won this salary and was in debt myself before that, so no I have not saved up. I managed to clear my debt and buy a house, I just don't understand the point of working.

I may as well save the £4k a month/£48k a year on nursery and claim benefits. After all I won't end up with much less.

That salary is with my bonus, which I put in significant overtime for and that is taxed 45% too. My point is, are we now going to be taxed at 50%? 55%? Where does it end.

well done you, and go on then give up your job, your house, and go on benefits see how you survive ? Your post is an insult for every hard working minimum wage person out there!

EasternStandard · 27/08/2024 11:16

poppymango · 27/08/2024 11:15

The money has to come from somewhere. What were you expecting?

The pre GE message I'd assume

How much more of your tax would you like to see go up?

cosyleafcafe · 27/08/2024 11:16

taxguru · 27/08/2024 11:14

@cosyleafcafe

If OP is earning just over £120k then she is not being taxed at 45%. She's being taxed at 40%.

Nope, her marginal tax rate on her wages between £100k and £120k will be a whopping 62% because of the tapering removal of her tax free personal allowance. She's also losing the tax free child care. So, yes, she's probably worse off at £120k than she'd have been earning only £99k.

That's why people earning between £100k and £125k should either pay the excess over £100k into pensions or reduce their hours to get back under £100k.

It's this kind of gross stupidity that RR and KS need to be tackling. They need to be thinking of ways to get people working more, rather than the typical Labour way of taxing them till the pips squeak. By the latter, it just means people work less, which is bad for the economy and increases the likes of waiting lists in the NHS when doctors work fewer hours to avoid these insane tax cliff edges and stupidly high marginal tax rates.

Ah I see, I didn't realise the personal allowance tapered. Thanks for explaining.

CeeJay81 · 27/08/2024 11:16

AdviceNeeded2024 · 27/08/2024 11:14

But they will still be worse off than you.

I understand your frustration that someone earning £300k a year more is in the same tax bracket. Same for those on £60k a year. So I completely get your point here and it is soul destroying seeing how much of your wage is taken away from you when you look at your pay slip.

I think you worded your opening post in a way that will rile people up, because there are a hell of a lot of low earners who work incredibly hard doing important jobs. And you must realise your wage does afford you a nice lifestyle that most couldn’t dream of, it just doesn’t come across like that in your post.

There are far too many very wealthy people who are allowed to dodge tax payments, there are too many loopholes to move money that are morally wrong, but not illegal. These are the people that should be taken to task. (And I am not saying that’s you OP clearly it isn’t but I think you’re directing some of your anger at the issue in the wrong place)

This.👏

angeldelite · 27/08/2024 11:16

WitchyBits · 27/08/2024 10:34

"It's the hard workers who will take the brunt. "

Just because you earn so much it doesn't mean that you are the hardest workers. Not by a country mile. A building sure labourer on minimum wage works hard in all weather. A hospital porter works hard. Nurses work hard and long shifts. Teachers Work hard for a pittance and get PTSD for it.

Earning an excellent wage doesn't mean you work harder than somebody on minimum wage. Often it's quite the opposite.

I'm sorry you are going to struggle but I'm aiming your part we will be sharing costs with you in the raising of your children and nursery etc. so you don't get just your wage of £120k before tax. So your family income is the very top tier and you are begrudging helping the people on the very very bottom. How lovely of you.

Where has OP said she begrudges helping people at the bottom?

firef1y · 27/08/2024 11:16

Vergus · 27/08/2024 11:07

Starmer likes to think of himself as The Warrior of the People but he needs to tread carefully. It’s never a good idea to piss off an already squeezed middle. And it’s all very noble, all this opening of the gate to all and sundry but honestly, where the fuck does he think he’s going to get the money from for all his promises?

It can’t all come from increased taxation for earners in a certain income bracket.

How the hell is someone on 6 figures "the middle", that would be those earning average wages ie,30-40k (pre-tax), anyone on 100k+ is not the middle of anything, they are earning 3x the national average and more than 5x the minimum wage

TheNuthatch · 27/08/2024 11:16

Solonga · 27/08/2024 10:44

Those with the broadest shoulders should bear the heaviest burden, so the pensioners on £12k then.

Excellent post 👏

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread