Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think I can get an enjoyable wfh job that pays 100k without working evenings and weekends?

252 replies

2kidsnewstart · 28/05/2024 10:07

I am currently a civil servant earning 80k pro rata'd to my 4 day a week part-time hours. Lots of benefits (pension etc) but due to the kind of role I am in I am expected to return to the office more.

That is difficult for me as last year me and the kids' dad split up (6dd and 2dd) meaning I can't afford additional £65 daily train fares to London on top of nursery fees plus all the other bills. We are 50:50 which I have realised is a very expensive way of splitting up!

Plus I leave before 7am and get home around 8pm so would have to find someone to look after the kids on my days in the office (my ex and I coparent very well but he can't always do childcare around my work all the time and we have no family nearby).

The civil service is great but I am 38 and feel like I could have a whole other career ahead of me and I wonder if there's an absolutely dreamy role that would be challenging but satisfying, well-paid, allow me to wfh and not require evenings and weekends?

AIBNU: No there's definitely that kind of role out there if you open your eyes/ retrain! (and please specify what kind of role!)

AIBU: That unicorn does not exist you should stay where you are!

OP posts:
the2andahalfmillion · 14/08/2024 20:13

AllyCart · 14/08/2024 10:50

Also bear in mind that it's estimated a public sector pension is equivalent to a 50% greater salary, such would be the cost of getting near to the same pension outcome in the private sector.

I find that pretty mindblowing. Is this an actuarial calculation? Is it across all salary bands?

I don’t know the data so genuinely interested.

I do think the promise of CS pension held more sway in the past when employee contributions were lower % of salary and drawable at a much younger age. I imagine it’s a bit less compelling now when retirement age is much higher and employee contribs also a bit higher (although I do recognise it is still a generous pension).

the2andahalfmillion · 14/08/2024 20:18

Plus, also, pension terms can change and are basically a promise of money in the future (obviously). For some people money right here right now is more appealing for various reasons I guess.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page