You seem incredibly sensitive on this point, why?
I don’t think they’re inferior, I think you’re doing an awful lot of projecting here. I haven’t insulted you at all. Whereas you started off swearing at me, you have clearly been searching my posts by suddenly commenting on long established threads I’m on (which I thought wasn’t considered cricket here).
I stand by my perspective that I do not consider scientific methodology suitable for analysing non- material points such as the existence of divine beings. This is something within the realm of imagination and creativity. This is not only my view but the view of many mystical traditions and individual mystics of various creeds throughout time. “There are more things in heaven and earth Horatian than are dreamed of in your philosophy” The sticking to one philosophy which is really entirely inappropriate in trying to understand something, does, I think, indicate a lack of creativity and imagination, esp in the context of religion.
I am perfectly happy to debate alternative perspectives. Yet, despite my prompting, you have repeatedly failed to put forward any logical arguments to counter my position. It’s clear by your own admission you don’t understand what my perspective is. All you have used from the off is ad hominem statements.
I suspect what you saw is the word “Religion” and this triggered some kind of cross phobia and experiences where religious people have made you feel inferior or wrong in some way. Unfortunately, this is a common situation and I’m sorry if this is what you have experienced but is a somewhat universal phenomenon in organised religion as it is a consequence of its structure. I don’t follow an organised religion and certainly don’t adhere to such othering which organised religion necessitates.
Now, if you want to enter into a debate about the appropriateness of scientific methodology to establish the existence of spirit I’m more than happy to do so. If you would like to discuss the role and necessity of imagination and creativity in spirituality, I’d love to, it would be great to discuss the effect of the Enlightenment on the imagination. I’m not willing to act as a punch bag for any past religious trauma (although happy to discuss that in a reasoned way too).