I get so annoyed when customers are the ones penalised for questioning tips when low wages and insecure work are the biggest problem facing service staff and that is an employers responsibility. Customers pay for the food, drinks and those prices ought to be enough for owners to to also cover wages of staff, if it doesn’t then their business model is failing.
I absolutely agree with you there.
Of course, I would never advocate being rude to the serving staff or blaming them for the policies of their employers that they're forced to be the public face of.
However, I'd love some of the people on this thread who are calling people 'tight' - even those of us who would be very happy to pay the full price that the business is wanting/expecting, but would just like to be given an inclusive price upfront - to explain exactly WHY they believe a tipping culture is a good thing in restaurants, when it isn't in almost all other NMW jobs. Not just to shout "Because it's tradition/customary" - because we have loads of traditions that haven't been maintained in modern times.
The tradition stems from putting the different classes in their place and forcing the working classes to rely on the arbitrary charity of the wealthy. NMW, although not amazing, was brought in specifically to entitle people to be paid a baseline amount and not to have to rely on altruism or charity for a living.
Anybody who has ever said "Why does XXX even have to be a charity and rely on public donations to do XXX essential work when it should be centrally funded by the government?" but who nevertheless actively wants to preserve the custom of tipping - not just as an occasional possibility for somebody to show gratitude for outstanding service but following the '10/15/20% is the accepted norm' line - I would ask how they square that manner of thinking.
If you want to campaign for a higher NMW across the board - or even just for restaurant staff, if they are your primary concern - then by all means go for it; but why is somebody a 'tightwad' for even questioning why they should have to pay the stated price of something and then be expected to pay another price on top of it in a restaurant?
Nobody says that if you only have £50 available, then you 'can't afford' £50-worth of shopping from Tesco, because you should somehow expect something priced at £50 to cost you £55 or £60.
I usually tip when I go to a restaurant, as I realise that it's customary, but I do not like this custom in the least. It's awkward and condescending if you do it, but because it's so ingrained, sends ambiguous messages if you don't. I am NOT looking to pay less, but I would really love it if restaurants would raise their prices accordingly and then make it abundantly clear that the stated price is an all-in price and is the total of what you pay - so you should settle your bill as given and pay not a penny more. Most other businesses can manage to do this - even other service/hospitality-based ones such as pubs and hotels - so why do we cling to this archaic, patronising, anti-egalitarian practice for restaurants?