I keep coming back to this but not quite knowing what to say. I'm not sure why you are unwilling to accept my viewpoint which has been my real life experience.
Because you seem to be insisting that you needed a diagnosis in order to be covered under the Equality Act, which isn’t correct. You acknowledge you had difficulties, you just didn’t know they were attributed to autism, therefore those impairments would have been covered by the Equality Act (or it’s predecessor depending on the year) before you were diagnosed. That is fact, not related to your “viewpoint”.
I didn't though, for about 40 years. Back in the 90s when I was running out of school nobody helped, I was punished. When I got my first job and needed help it wasn't there. I don't suspect autism, I thought I was fucking weird. Not ok. Abnormal. I struggled through my life because I did not know.
You are misunderstanding. I didn’t say you had to suspect autism from childhood. I said if you didn’t have any difficulties you wouldn’t have suspected autism or pursued an assessment and diagnosis.
You posted you had/have difficulties and you must have suspected autism at some point otherwise why would you pursue an assessment and diagnosis. As the criteria for diagnosis is difficulties that “limit and impair everyday functioning”. Why would anyone without any difficulties think they may be autistic as they wouldn’t meet the criteria.
The law may have been on my side but realistically if I had walked into work and said X is difficult, can you arrange Y, the first thing they would have looked for would be a reason, and I did not have that.
You did have a reason. The reason doesn’t need to have a diagnosis. The impairments themselves are reason enough.
Knowing who you are is one of the most important things a person could ever have.
Please quote where I have posted otherwise?