Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

... to think that it's inappropriate to use 5-year-olds to sell cosmetics

41 replies

EllHell · 30/10/2007 22:34

DD1 has just started going to Rainbows. Just got a note sent home (with a Body Shop catalogue) to say that a future week's meeting is going to be dedicated to a Body Shop event, where a lady will come and demonstrate their products, the girls can give a parent a hand massage and [and this is the bit I object to] any girl who places an order worth over £50 will get a special prize.

I don't mind the catalogue at all. 10% of the money raised will go to the Rainbow and Brownie packs involved, so it's a good way of fund-raising. But I do object to the fact that 5-year-olds are being promised 'a prize' (basically 'commission'!) if they sell over £50-worth of stuff.

I am also slightly at how interesting a Body Shop demonstration is actually going to be for 5-7-year-olds. I heard the Rainbow leader telling them that 'a lady is going to come and show us some nice moisturisers and things'. Do 6-year-olds use moisturiser? As far as mine are concerned I could wash their hair with carbolic soap and it'd be all the same to them. I'd understand it more if it was teenagers, but not Infant-age kids.

I am thinking of just not sending dd that week and doing something else nice with her instead. I'm not furious about this or anything... it just seems a bit odd to me. Or is it just me that's odd?

OP posts:
agnesnitt · 31/10/2007 10:19

Whatever happened to the catalogue for cards and wrapping paper that most Guide and Brownie packs used to use for fund-raising? This is total cobblers and I'd be unhappy if it were a group my daughter went to.

Agnes

2sugars · 31/10/2007 10:24

Not on at all. And I'd be surprised if it sat comfortably with the Body Shop's ethics, too.

hercules1 · 31/10/2007 10:29

Madness

onebatmother · 31/10/2007 10:30

YANBU at all. Yuck, yuck.
£50 prize bit is totally inappropriate
Little girls and moisturiser?

Is it because Body Shop are supposed to be ethical that they're getting away with this? Would brownies do it if it was L'Oreal or whoever?

Colditz that dove film made me cry! I must be very very tired.

TotalChaos · 31/10/2007 10:30

hello, and nice to see you back, not seen you around on MN for a while hercules (was formerly mummytosteven)

mindalina · 31/10/2007 10:31

Does the Body Shop still have ethics then? Having been bought by L'Oreal?

I can see why parents don't like this idea, and have to admit that I don't have children this age so can't really comment from that perspective,
BUT I used to love Body Shop stuff when I was little - I seem to recall I was buying/being bought stuff from there from about 6. They have some nice stuff aimed at children, or used to anyway, and it's not (wasn't) cosmetic-y stuff, just soap and bubble bath, things like that. IIRC all me and my friends at primary had little lip balms from the Body Shop. I always thought their stuff was aimed at younger people - children/young teens.

mindalina · 31/10/2007 10:32

Meant to also say - putting 6yr olds on commission is pretty awful.

2sugars · 31/10/2007 10:38

Indeed mindalina. Though I think they still purport to .....

chopchopbusybusy · 31/10/2007 10:48

IMO your DD has years ahead of her trying to think of excuses as to why she can't attend someones partylite, tupperware, bodyshop etc parties without having to do it when she's 5!

Don't like the idea at all. When DDs went to Rainbows and Brownies they used to occasionally come home with a catalogue (or more usually just a note saying a catalogue was available on request) for various things, usually chocoholics. I had no problem with this as the pack made a commission and the hostess gift was saved for raffle prizes or tombolas. But there was no obligation to sit through some boring demonstration.

onebatmother · 31/10/2007 10:50

thanks mindalina was trying to say that..very very tired.

EllHell · 01/11/2007 11:59

Blimey... Do I get some sort of prize for the only AIBU thread ever to have total consensus!?

I will order a few bits and bats from the catalogue (to give the SIL I don't like for Christmas [hhmm]) and won't send dd that week. I do think it's been done genuinely but unthinkingly as a way of raising some funds, but I definitely think it's A Bad Idea. I'll mention to the leaders that I think the prize is unfair too and will suggest that they give a little prize to all the girls who attend (not my dd then!) instead.

That film made me shudder, colditz. God, I loathe the 'beauty industry'. [shudder]

Thanks all!

OP posts:
onebatmother · 01/11/2007 14:49

sorely tempted to name-change and yabu you to spoil consensus..

Ellbell · 01/11/2007 16:15
Ineedacleaner · 01/11/2007 16:27

mindalina you had exactly the same thought as me re. l'oreal thing. I think the day they bought it the Body SHop ethics flew out the window.

My dd is 4 and loves bubbly baths and Ickle baby bath blitzers from Lush but she is baffled as to why I put cream etc on thinks it is stupid. I am happy for her to feel like that, she doesn't need to start messing with her skin like that for many years to come.

I do agree that it is probably just an ill thought out best of intentions situation and it may be worth having a quiet word with the leaders to raise your objections and I doubt you are alone in them

berolina · 01/11/2007 16:31

A prize for the biggest/a big order???

YANBU!!!!

mummytoaswashbucklerdd · 01/11/2007 21:03

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page