Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To have thought I would never, ever in my life, have to algebra or fractions AGAIN?

30 replies

HorseyWoman · 31/08/2007 14:35

I though n=ydnefg3 was well behind me. I did my GCSE 7 years ago and got a pretty respectable grade, but I've had no coaching in maths since then! Not even the fact my mother did a maths degree and teaches maths, is any consolation!

I am about to start a PGCE - primary with English specialism; but we also have to be acquainted with primary level science, maths, ICT and the foundation subjects. I have to do QTS tests in Numeracy, ICT, Science and Literacy! I am ok on everything, and if I am honest, most of the maths has come flooding back, and a bit of revision on long division is all I seem to need to get me back into the flow. But I could sit there for 92 hours looking at algebra and still not understand it or what is expected of me! And I understand fractions but what's this nonsense of multiplying a fraction by a fraction (or adding, dividing, subtracting). Why can't numbers be represented by numbers in maths, rather than this stupid secret code they call algebra!?

My maths teacher was pretty rubbish and it was on the basis of my mum's knowledge and past teachers, that I got a good GCSE. I am thinking maybe if I go see one of the maths tutors at uni they might be able to help me, especially seeing as it is not my specialism and they realise many people won't have looked at maths since GCSE or O level.

I am really beginning to panic. They said we were supposed to read all these books and do all these tests on our summer break, but I haven't really had one. I only recently left my 60 hour a week nanny job, just bought all the books to read/tests to try out, and have 2 weeks til school week and 3 weeks til uni starts! Panic panic panic.

Don't know why this post is here. Am I being unreasonable to want to extinguish algebra from the planet?

OP posts:
Bink · 31/08/2007 16:15

(Apologies in advance - I am going to sound like I have taken leave of senses.)

In a remainder bookshop this week I found this book: Painless Algebra and bought it as a present for ds (who is 8 and adores maths). The idea is that he and I are going to work through the book v v gradually and at the end of it I am going to understand as much as he does already. And he, sweetly, is very excited about this.

Reallytired · 31/08/2007 16:16

What sort of algebra are you finding hard. Can you give an example of a question?

constancereader · 31/08/2007 16:27

If your PGCE is anything like mine, they won't notice if you haven't finished all the reading over the summer break. I did it all before I arrived, yet when the course started it was barely referred to.

I took maths GCSE three times in order to get a C. I did my PGCE about ten years later and was initially very anxious about teaching maths, but found it became my favourite subject to teach in the end. I think it is much better taught now, the children seem to love it too.

So don't worry too much. I am sure you will be fine.

HorseyWoman · 31/08/2007 16:31

Awww, bink, that sounds lovely! I might take a look.

Reallytired, now I am working my way through the algebra chapter, the only bit I actually can't move forward on is on using algebra to prove general statements. Everything else seems to have clicked as I have remembered my GCSE.

This isn't a question; it's an example, but I fail to see how they arrived at the answer:

In maths it is possible to use summing to prove general statements and also conjectures. A conjecture is a hypothesis, something that has been surmised or deduced.

One such instance is stating that adding consecutive odd numbers, starting at 1, will result in the square numbers, i.e.:

1 = 1 = 1squared
1+3 = 4 = 2squared
1+3+5 = 9 = 3squared
1+3+5+7 = 16 = 4squared (I am following well so far! Easy so far!)

In order to prove this, it is necessary first to construct the general sequence of odd numbers (use the difference methos above if necessary):

position: 1 2 3 ... (n-2) (n-1) n
term: 1 3 5 ... (2n-5) (2n-3) (2n - 1)

If the sum of the first n odd numbers is S, then:

S = 1+3+5...+(2N-5) + (2N-3) + 2N-1)

The expression that is equal to S can be written in reverse order without changing the value due to the commutative nature of addition:

S + (2n-1) + (2n-3) + 2n-5) + ... + 5 + 3 + 1

If these two values for S are added together a value for 2S is achieved:

2S=(1+(2n-1) + (3+(2n-3) + (5+(2n-5) + ... +((2n-5)+5) + ((2n-3)+3) + ((2n-1)+1)
2S= 2n+2n+2n+...+2n+2n+2n
2S=nx2n
2S=2nsquared
S=nsquared

This shows that the sum of consecutive odd numbers starting at 1, will result in a square number being generated.

OK, I've done differences, quadratic expression, general statements, substitution and simplification. This one page is peeing me off!

I have done my Science and English audits and got 90%+ on each section of those. All the other parts of my maths are fine.

OP posts:
HorseyWoman · 31/08/2007 16:32

Hi constance, thank you.

That's the thing, I love other parts of maths. I enjoy logic and being able to solve things... there only being one way to solve it, and just tearing through a load of questions. Grrr. I am sure I am worrying myself over nothing, and it's like exams: when actually asked a question, you could probably answer it, it's just the text books make you worry!

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page