School band playing Michael Jackson

[recededpronunciation]

It’s been decided that the school band - a group of 11 year old boys - are going to play a Michael Jackson number at the next concert. School staff were involved in this decision.

AIBU or is this just massively inappropriate in the wake of the Leaving Neverland revelations?

At DD’s last speech day one of the year 10 boys did a MJ tribute bit. He’s very talented but I found it slightly inappropriate given the crotch grabbing ( which 9 year old DS was very amused by), I doubt he would be allowed to do it now

YABVU what do you think will happen to those boys who play a Michael Jackson's song?

Why don't we do a re run of Jimmy Saville's shows on telly as well, after all what will happen ?

Also we're fed for years how he only liked white young boys - ignoring the many girls who also stayed with MJ, that Jordan wasn't white, Emmanuel Lewis wasn't, all the sisters who stayed but weren't famous as their brothers, his niece who stayed lots and had a relationship for 7+ years with WR during the time he alledges abuse, and so on

I don't understand how any of this information is relevant, changes anything, or means there's a chance WR and JS might not have been abused?

It's amazing how some people apply some things to Jackson so he can't be guilty.

He's dead so can't defend himself.... So was Jimmy Saville

A court found him not guilty.... Same with OJ Simpson.

Does anyone think JS or OJ wasn't guilty? Really.

@staydazzling We can’t blame the whole of the Catholic Church because there are a few individuals who abuse their position. We can blame them for attempting to cover it up.
It would be the same as boycotting MJ’s producers etc and everyone associated with it.

@FrenchJunebug Walt Disney was a racist idiot, not a paedophile.

Paedophiles will always be in a category of their own. No forgiveness and no chance for redemption.

@YemenRoadYemen relevant because doesn't fit the narrative the media pushes

Or that Brandi has a LOT to say about her time dating WR but is ignored. Odd not to want to hear from a girl who was WITH him at NL a LOT. Odd to not mention that he dated her during all of his allegations. Of course it's possible she knew nothing... and it happened, but odd to erase her from history and his reason for being present at NL some of the time he was. She was a big part of his life during his visits. Not even briefly mentioned at any point. They were best friends and dated right up till he cheated with several known women. Cheating obviously doesn't mean he's not telling the truth about abuse but why erase her existence when she featured heavily at this time

relevant because doesn't fit the narrative the media pushes

So? This has nothing to do with whether these two men were abused by MJ or not.

And it's entirely arguable that there's a narrative that MJ targeted 'white boys'. He targeted kids, and now several have spoken out.

@YemenRoadYemen BJ was there, dating him. Relevant if we're going to talk about his time at NL and imply he didn't like them having relationships and turned them against women, but organised them hanging out. Relevant if he's turned against his mum but they're in and out of each other's houses and around each other's family all the time.

At least let's stick with the truth if they were abused and not exploit graphic stories that are being discredited.

More kids defend MJ than have accused him. A lot are angry and some state they're being offered huge amounts to change their tune about defending MJ by the press.

Yeah it's possible JS was abused... but a triggering detailed story proven untrue is not going to help his credibility. Reed could have at least researched before drawing out graphic accounts and publicly sharing them on a platform rather than discredit the very guys he claims to give a voice to.

I went to see my DD2's (age 10) school show today, took my DM with me.

It wasn't until her class started singing Waltzing Matilda and my DM asked me "Do you think they've had to pay royalties to Rolf Harris?" that I realised how deeply unsettling it was - I just hadn't realised/remembered it had been his song.

YANBU OP.

I don't associate Waltzing Matilda with RH. Did he sing it?

Waltzing Maltida was written in the nineteenth century - Harris sang it but it is not his song.

@namechangedmner So because a tv studio got a date wrong, the victims are lying? Do you know how desperate that sounds?

Also because MJ fans THINK they 'know' so much about Robson and Safechuck, you just.....believe them and the lies they tell? Sorry but you seem rather gullible if you use twitter as a source, doubly so if you believe anything Jackson fans say about the victims. Of COURSE they are going to try and smear and discredit the victims.

"McCauley being implied as a replacement when he was 2 years older than the alleged victim"
I don't follow your point. Why does it even matter how old McCauley was???

"liked white young boys - ignoring the many girls who also stayed with MJ"
No one said he only liked white boys. Where you got that from, who knows? But that is new to me. And you ignore the fact that apart from Chantal Robson, NO girls ever stayed with Jackson.

"Also we are fed that the alarm system is a creepy thing - without being told his bedroom had 2 storeys, was the size of a house and the alarm was installed after a fan managed to hide in a closet for a week"
We know about the size of his bedroom. It is irrelevant. He had alarms at his front doors/windows. WHY did he need trip alarms and alarms at the entrance of his bedroom? It doesn't matter how big his bedroom was, he still didn't need alarms at his bedroom. That, is the point you don't get.
And where are you getting your source from that a fan managed to hide in a closet for a week? Seriously? Food, water, toilet, etc? Honestly, just think about it. Such rubbish. I am sure you got it from a fan of twitter who made it up on the spot.

All of those anecdotes you got from fans on twitter, and you ignore the overwhelming evidence of tv footage of Jackson and Safechuck looking at rings? ACTUAL proof and footage? Not a word from you on that. I think you protest too much about not being a Jackson fan. It's clear to me you are choosing 'fans' as your sources and believing the anecodotes and made up claims you wish to believe, and discarding actual footage and evidence.

Why do you automatically believe people lie about this?

@FrenchJunebug So you are comparing CHILD SEXUAL MOLESTATION with different political views that were common at that time? Really? Do you know how desperate that sounds?

You can't be serious!

@namechangedmner

"And you really believe the bs about Brandi dating him? It seems that you are believing everything you read from the pro-Jackson side, without applying the same level of critical thinking to pro-Jackson propaganda and lies as you do to the victims. You realise this Brandi has a reason to lie, she and her relatives benefit from the large Jackson estate and the investments from that estate? She was not there. She was not going on tour with Jackson and Robson.

"More kids defend MJ than have accused him."
So? It's strange you pick such petty holes in victims testimony, yet cling to something as silly as 'well, most kids have defended him'. So bloody what?!??? More people defended Rolf Harris than accused him! More people defended Saville than accused him. SO WHAT?!?? Jackson, like Harris and Saville, came across hundreds of thousands of children. Paedophiles choose those they can get to know, and get access to. They don't molest every child they come across. OF COURSE there are going to be more defending him than not. Is this really how weak your level of critical thinking is?
"A lot are angry." - And? The victims are angry, too.
"some state they're being offered huge amounts to change their tune about defending MJ by the press." So they say. And you believe them? Why don't you apply the same biased and petty over-critical thinking to their 'claims' that you do to the victims? At this point, you are basically giving yourself away as a huge MJ fan, you are so blinkered in automatically believing what uber fans claim, yet doubt 2 people who were able to be brave enough to face the world knowing they would be dragged through the mud. You buy all the weak excuses and lies and hearsay from fans, yet don't believe victims, one who has newsreel footage that backs up his truth? Very convenient that you apply no critical thinking to the information you want to believe.

Oh ffs a tv studio didn't get a date wrong - the guy told a graphic story about abuse in a specific place that only existed 3 years after he said it happened in that room and described it!

But I'm too busy to argue with people- convince yourself the mans guilty if it makes you happier

As for it being BS he dated Brandi... erm, reaching much?

Anyway believe whatever you like.

The info is from a former FBI agent who investigated Jackson:

"So what did we learn from the Jim Clemente interview.
1/ There was no formal 10 to 13 year investigation into Michael Jackson
2/ The FBI did want to bring a federal case against Michael Jackson but because of the statute of limitations it did not happen
3/ Jim Clemente in 2001 reached out to Michael Jackson's head of security and told the head of security that he was responsible for the safety of the young child in MJ's entourage
4/ Jim Clemente also told the head of the security if MJ was a pedophile that he could help him and gave him his card
5/ There was another victim during the investigation that shut down during the grand jury and because of this MJ could not be charged for that victim
6/ The FBI found both Jordan and Gavin credible and Jim Clemente stated that Jordan did accurately describe the markings on MJ's genitalia
7/That there will more than likely be more victims coming forward
In an interview that lasted approximately 30 minutes it yields such a great deal of information. Again this page that everyone is participating in and sharing your stories and support can and will make a difference because of our persistence to make a difference."
This Facebook page has information rebutting Brandi's claims as well.

www.facebook.com/pg/waderobsonsupporters/posts/?ref=page_internal

Of course you don't want to 'argue' with people. You've been got at by Jackson supporters and you don't like that you've been had. You've already made up your mind that Jackson is innocent - and his victims are guilty. You aren't interested in facts. Just holding onto your fantasy of Jackson. The " 'objective' fanatics' " (as those who claim 'I am not a huge fan, BUT...' are called) when called out, all run away from the discussion.

lunafortjest no I didn't. No need to shout.

I didn't even know who MJ was till I was an adult. Hard to believe but I grew up in a bloody cult! No I wasn't a fan. His music was ok when I heard it as an adult but I don't own a single cd.

Not a fan. A survivor of CSA and bothered by the documentary.

Won't be replying anymore and NCing again as 2 MNers immediately know exactly who I am from this post and can both vouch if they see this post at all though I don't know their MN names so that's unlikely that I've told them I'm too busy studying with a deadline.

Believe what you like - but otherwise I might spend my time arguing further.

You can decide what you like however

I only believe the facts. And I have posted facts. You have posted none whatsoever. If what I and others have posted doesn't at make you at least doubt your position, then there is no reasoning with you. You have already made up your mind to believe Jackson is innocent. You refuse to believe otherwise, and you are impervious to reason or to facts. You have to reconcile that with yourself. Good luck with that.

No it doesn't - Reed himself and Joy Robson have confirmed they dated in interviews.

And no I'm not.

But think what the fuck you like.

I never said they didn't date. I meant them dating proves nothing. And yes, you are. You have made it quite clear you will not listen to facts or reason. You will only believe what you want to believe, and that's sad that you refuse to listen to reason or facts, all for some rich star that wouldn't even look twice at you. Quite foolish of you.

You've linked to a Facebook site full of tabloid articles just as crazed as some of the MJ fans and given your opinion.

And stated these are facts.

If Jim Clemente is the same person I think - will google later, hardly credible either.

But if you can't handle that someone isn't a crazed MJ fan and looks at things as a CSA survivor and takes issue with Dan Reed doing this documentary and doesn't feel at all "helped" or that WR or JS are being helped by this either and actually having their credibility undermined... well that's really YOUR problem.

They either lied under oath in court or are lying now.There is no escaping the fact that they are liars and it looks though their stories are unraveling......
Not a mj fan but I don't believe these 2 fortune hunters