My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

To refuse to take indirect flights with a toddler

135 replies

dellacucina · 07/01/2019 22:50

to destinations where direct flights are readily available but generally more expensive?

That's all really!

OP posts:
Report
dellacucina · 07/01/2019 23:35

Ha, and these later messages make me feel I am unreasonable!

OP posts:
Report
southnownorth · 07/01/2019 23:37

We are going indirect for the first time to the USA this year, it was half the price of direct flights, but my children are 12 and 17.

No way with a todder, infact I never flew for years with young children as my eldest hated flying.

Report
DippyAvocado · 07/01/2019 23:38

It depends how much money you've got! I flew indirect to New York via Toronto. It took longer but was half the price. That was the only way I could afford to go at all so the changing flights didn't bother me.

Report
SpoonBlender · 07/01/2019 23:38

I've paid 30% more to go direct in the past. Not unreasonable at all, if you can afford it. DH is being a dick. Does he do any toddler-looking-after during the flight, or just keel over asleep and leave it all to you? Because that's what you should do if you end up losing this argument.

Report
budgiegirl · 07/01/2019 23:42

Depends how much money you have surely?

^This.

We’ve flown a few times indirect to Florida, with three DC ( youngest was 3 the first time, so not quite a toddler). It saved £1800 and meant that our holiday budget could stretch to long haul. Couldn’t have afforded to fly direct.

Report
zzzzz · 08/01/2019 00:36

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Purpleartichoke · 08/01/2019 00:52

I feel very strongly that travel should be as convenient as possible. Direct flights save time and every flight change increases the risk of something going wrong with the trip. I don’t have infinite money, but if my budget can possibly acccomodate a direct flight, that is what happens.

Report
Namenic · 08/01/2019 01:00

i specifically choose direct flights for 12hr journey because then I don’t have to deal with baby waking up and going through take off (pressure changes) twice. That said, I haven’t really tried doing indirect flights so I guess cannot give true comparison. I also choose night flights as in my experience toddler sleeps better.

Report
QwertyLou · 08/01/2019 08:50

YANBU to insist on direct flights. The one time I flew indirect with my son (4) we nearly missed our connection and they lost our bags!

Report
zzzzz · 08/01/2019 08:52

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

SnowsInWater · 08/01/2019 09:03

With small children I would pay what I had to to fly direct if I could afford it - if your DH insists on indirect and it is not a joint decision I would hand over small child as I got off the plane to transfer, go for a coffee/drink/massage and meet him in the queue to board again. With older kids it would be a family decision - does the money saved mean a few more nights away or nicer accommodation. If so I would put it to a vote. Ultimately though I would have the casting vote 😂

Report
trojanpony · 08/01/2019 09:23

I have no children at all and will only fly direct

Yanbu
I hate stopovers and transfers

It’s also nothing like business in terms of cost (£300ish for direct vs £1k plus for business is not the same)

Report
PineapplePower · 08/01/2019 09:30

We nearly always fly indirect because it’s at least twice as expensive to go direct. With small kids, it’s fine, actually I’ve convinced myself it’s better Grin.

We take them to a play area to let off some steam, change diapers, have something to eat ... some airports truly are crappy so I usually try to pick decent ones for stopovers.

We have taken to 48-hour city breaks as well, this is a enjoyable way to see more and still save some £££ makes stopovers less stressful.

Very good and comprehensive travel insurance is a must though, so flight changes/cancellations/lost luggage/illness won’t cost you a bloody fortune.

Report
BarbaraofSevillle · 08/01/2019 09:34

Depends on the price difference and time difference. Changing plans isn't really that much of a hassle and can save hundreds if not thousands of pounds for a bit extra journey time.

Obviously I wouldn't turn a 2 hour journey into an 8 hour journey to save £50 and/or a small percentage of the cost of the flights, but sometimes flying via a hub airport gives you so many more flight choices so can save loads for just a couple of extra hours or so.

If it's a few hundred quid or more, that's definitely worth thinking about doing, unless you are very wealthy.

Report
livingthegoodlife · 08/01/2019 09:35

Just do it. I've flown long haul with a 9 month old on my own with a changeover in Dubai. I've also flown long haul with 3 children under 4 (with husband) also changing in Dubai (note: 20 minutes is not long to change flights and go through security with 3 toddlers!).

I love travelling with my kids. We go to a lot of different places.

Report
haggisaggis · 08/01/2019 09:37

When my dc were small dh had air miles available every year which enabled us to go to the US on holiday - but was always indirect flights. Usually 3 planes. Just thought of it as an adventure and got on with it.

Report
Returning2thesceneofthecrime · 08/01/2019 09:38

YANBU!

Wish I could say that louder!

Report
MissMooMoo · 08/01/2019 09:42

We do it all the time to save money.
Recently did it over Christmas as it was about £1200 cheaper than the direct flight.
It also means that we can fly from London city instead of Heathrow or Gatwick and we live very close to city.
Zurich is a great airport for transfers. They have great play areas and viewing decks for children to watch planes land and take off.

Report
CatnissEverdene · 08/01/2019 09:46

With toddlers? Not a chance in hell.

I'd rather stay home.

Even as an adult it's stressful with time delays and luggage issues. I'd always pay for direct travel.

Report
HotInWinter · 08/01/2019 09:48

Direct where possible, unless it involves schlepping everything down to London, when 2 flights from a regional airport can often be preferable.

Report
blackteasplease · 08/01/2019 09:51

Let me guess, when you get to the flights and change over, he will expect you to do all the toddler wrangling? Maybe he'll habe a nice sleep or watch a film while you entertain you child? And all addition packing stress /requirements caused by the cha ge

Report
blackteasplease · 08/01/2019 09:52

Sorry, but the change over will fall to you?

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Firesuit · 08/01/2019 09:56

For me, direct costs 20% more, business hundreds of percent, it's ridiculous to compare them.

Also, knocking hours off a journey is more of a benefit than having a bigger chair.

Report
FevertreeLight · 08/01/2019 09:57

I have no children at all and will only fly direct

Then you severely restrict where you go in the world. The majority cannot be accessed directly from any UK airport.

Report
dellacucina · 08/01/2019 09:58

blackteasplease more or less! At the endbof our outgoing flight, the woman sitting behind us tapped me on the shoulder and complimented me on how well I handled the flight on my own with a toddler...!

OP posts:
Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.