I wanted to return to this thread to add this graph showing changes over time in the ratio of males to females in the upper tail end of the maths SAT scores distribution.
Clearly there has been considerable improvement in the ratio in the elite ‘tail of the tail'. This is probably indicative of shifts in perception of the capabilities of females at society level.
However, it's also clear that in more recent years progress has tapered off and we remain a considerable way away from parity of representation.
Other exacting maths tests probing the extreme upper end of the ability curve have a similar story to tell about the gender gap.
Various contributory factors have been suggested. For example:
• Females could do better but aren't interested.
• Females still have to contend with demotivating cultural and social pressures that males are not subject to.
• Females are intrinsically less able at maths.
• Females just aren’t as competitive as men.
Of the above, the one I would be ditching immediately is the notion that females lack a keen sense of competition. If anything I would say that girls are more goal-oriented (not in a football sense ) than boys at a younger age and more prepared to put the necessary training hours in! They certainly achieve better exam results in most school subjects.
I don’t think anyone would disagree that sociocultural effects and ‘stereotype threat’ can influence performance, and many will even acknowledge that males as a group may be more likely to gravitate towards STEM subjects, so I’d like to concentrate on addressing the more controversial assertion made by some researchers that ‘females are intrinsically less able at maths’.
For me, mathematical intelligence is a complex mix of integrated competencies such being able to make connections, to see patterns, to create a sustained chain of deductive reasoning and to bring together old ideas in novel configurations. I have come across no evidence to persuade me that men are more capable of engaging in such higher order thought processes.
But the highest does not stand without the lowest. There is a considerable body of evidence showing that certain basic visuospatial sub-skills are stronger in males and that these may feed into manifested mathematical ability. So it could be that it is simply harder for females to realise their latent mathematical intelligence.
It would be interesting to have a breakdown of results for the SAT test and others like it to see if females are underperforming relative to males in questions with a greater ‘visuospatial loading’, so perhaps in geometry rather than algebra. If this is the case, it would suggest that further narrowing of the achievement gap could be facilitated through spatial skills training for girls. (Neuroplasticity means that spatial abilities can be improved with practice.)
I think that we need to be open-minded in this contentious matter. The rigid ideologue who refuses to contemplate possible areas of relative weakness in the female cognitive profile in favour of a ‘just the environment’ credo may be hindering progress.