My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

MNHQ have commented on this thread

AIBU?

Circumcision: A Social Status in the UK ?

999 replies

Amazonia · 25/04/2014 09:06

Curiously in the UK, circumcision is now a matter of social class. While the "ordinary" folks rarely circumcise, circumcision is prevalent in the upper class as well as in the Royal family.

OP posts:
Report
Bluestocking · 26/04/2014 19:55

Posters need to disclose the ages of their posh boyfriends. My own (small sample of two) posh boyfriends, who would have been born in 1963/4, were both circumcised and both regarded it as a PLU marker - eg the vast majority of boys they'd been at school with were circumcised. It would be nice to think this isn't happening as a routine matter any more.

Report
LittleBearPad · 26/04/2014 19:58

What a staggeringly odd thread. Who gives a flying fuck.

Report
Andrewofgg · 26/04/2014 20:10

Amazonia Being done myself I'm not sure I want to think too much about that Grin

Report
brokenhearted55a · 26/04/2014 20:10

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Sallyingforth · 26/04/2014 22:13

I wish people wouldn't use the word 'mutilate' in these threads

You can wish all you like my dear.

But cutting healthy bits off a human body is mutilation.

Report
Amazonia · 26/04/2014 22:21

A mosquito bite or a simple scratch can be considered a mutilation, depending on how sentitive you are on that issue, right?

In India, some folks refuse to have their nails trimmed.

OP posts:
Report
DameDiazepamTheDramaQueen · 26/04/2014 22:47

Cutting healthy bits off a child is 'unnecessary' my dear if the child doesn't need it, the result is not a mutilated penis, it's a circumcised penis.

I consider female circumcision mutilation because it is never necessary afaik.

I really shouldn't read these threadsHmm

Report
Sallyingforth · 26/04/2014 23:11

I really shouldn't read these threads

Probably not, if you don't want to hear people disagreeing with you about cutting bits off helpless babies.

Report
jaundicedoutlook · 26/04/2014 23:20

Always thought The Royals were generally regarded as Cavaliers. Not Roundheads...

Report
Alisvolatpropiis · 26/04/2014 23:24

Erm, no a mosquito bit isn't a mutilation. It's an insect bite. What a ludicrous analogy.

Report
Caitlin17 · 26/04/2014 23:34

It is not a good analogy. If it's not done for genuine medical reasons then whether you call it "mutilation" or "circumcision" comes down to your personal preference.

Some people think "piercings" are mutilations.

Report
Primafacie · 26/04/2014 23:52

OP why are you messaging me? Confused If you have views to air please keep them for your thread. Thanks

Report
Amazonia · 27/04/2014 11:43

Millions of cells in your body die daily. Sun burning is mutilation. Eating spicy food or a drink which is too hot can also be considered as mutilation.

The question is: Is circumcision felt as a mutilation by those who are circumcised?

OP posts:
Report
Martorana · 27/04/2014 11:49

"The question is: Is circumcision felt as a mutilation by those who are circumcised?"

No it isn't. The question is whether it is ever OK to perform non medically required surgery on somebody who is unable to consent.

To which the answer is, obviously, "No".

Report
WilsonFrickett · 27/04/2014 11:59

Don't be silly OP. To mutilate is 'to inflict a violent and disfiguring injury on'. Eating a rogan josh gives you heartburn. It does not mutilate you.

Report
Amazonia · 27/04/2014 13:00

So, do you really believe that circumcision inflicts a violent and disfiguring injury?

If this practice has been going on since ever, would you say that mankind or at least 20% of it loves inflicting violent and disfiguring injury? Can you really believe that????

OP posts:
Report
Amazonia · 27/04/2014 13:06

Martorana: Most specialists would agree that newborn circumcision gives a far better aesthetic result than adult circumcision. Consequently, if parents seek the best for their children, they are not likely to wait until the child is able to consent.

Most circumcised men never complain ant it is mainly the uncircumcised ones who seem to have a problem with circumcision. Of course, it can happen that a circ hasn't been performed properly and the person can hence regret having been circumcised, but this is not the usual situation, is it?

OP posts:
Report
merrymouse · 27/04/2014 13:15

There are a fair few threads on MN discussing 'top' public schools, but in 10 years of dipping in and out I have never come across a single thread discussing the best place in Harely Street to get your son circumcised.

We might not have all shagged men from the upper classes, but I think that if circumcision were a 'thing' plenty of us would have met posh mothers in RL or online who were pondering whether to bother or not.

Automatic circumcision for non-religious reasons is just not common practice in the UK.

Report
Amazonia · 27/04/2014 13:19

The UC communicates otherwise than like ordinary folks on the Net. They had their Rotary Clubs and what have you while the others were still being spoonfed.

OP posts:
Report
Trills · 27/04/2014 13:31

If I were going to do something to my child to designate their social status, I'd make it something that more people can SEE!

Willies are generally hidden away.

Report
merrymouse · 27/04/2014 13:33

Nope. Even if there are absolutely no posh people on mumsnet, these days upper class people have jobs and go to school where they meet and talk to all sorts of different people.

On the other hand, if you are arguing that the best way to tell whether somebody is Jewish is to check if they are circumcised I think you have left the realms of logic.

Report
Amazonia · 27/04/2014 13:55

merrymouse: I was relating to the Nazi time when it was usual for the Nazi soldiers to identify the jewish people by the status of their penis. Probably, such a check today would not be very accurate.

OP posts:
Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

WilsonFrickett · 27/04/2014 15:16

So, do you really believe that circumcision inflicts a violent and disfiguring injury?

If that question was aimed at me op, I've never conflated circumcision with mutilation. So from that we can infer that I do not. Although I do think it's a ridiculous, painful and pointless thing to do to a child if there is no medical need.

Report
Amazonia · 27/04/2014 15:50

It may also be ridiculous and even painful to carry an extra long overhang

OP posts:
Report
WilsonFrickett · 27/04/2014 15:52

Then that would constitute a medical need, wouldn't it? Confused

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.