My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

to ask why the Yes campaign in Scotland wants to keep the pound?

171 replies

grovel · 14/04/2014 15:32

That's it really. Surely an independent Scotland would want its own Central Bank setting interest rates etc?

OP posts:
Report
Eastwiththem · 14/04/2014 18:56

dinosaurs Great Britain is the piece of land that contains Scotland, England and Wales, so Great Britain will continue to exist as a geographical term no matter what.

The United Kingdom refers to the thrones of Wales, England and Scotland which have been united to be under one monarchy.

Northern Ireland gets tacked on the end as it's not a full kingdom and it's not part of Great Britain.

rUK would have to drop the Great Britain part of the name but could still call themselves the United Kingdom.

Report
grovel · 14/04/2014 18:59

And that is why we need independence- because the UK gov do not work in Scotland's best interests. Not now. Not in the past. Not ever.

Well, since 1707 we've seen off Napoleon, the Kaiser and Hitler together. We have jointly built the 6th largest economy in the world on a small island on the fringes of Northern Europe. We've jointly built a functioning democracy without a revolution. We've jointly built judicial systems on similar principles. We've jointly built a Welfare State. Etc. I can understand the Independence movement but don't think rubbishing our common achievements in such broad terms is helpful.

OP posts:
Report
SantanaLopez · 14/04/2014 19:00

Some of the claims on here are mental!

Scotland is not the rUK's second biggest trade partner.
40% of rUK exports go to the Eurozone.
20% of rUK exports go to the USA.
10% go to Scotland.

In the event of the yes vote winning, who gets to negotiate on behalf of Scotland then?

The SNP have promised to create a cross-party negotiation team.

In the Irish/British split (admittedly in 1921) plenipotentiaries were appointed by both Governments to negotiate, they then reported back and both parliaments had to vote on the treaty they agreed.

Report
Roseformeplease · 14/04/2014 19:03

My sources.....

Actually, I can't be bothered.

I am totally sick of the "Yes" people and their pseudo-economics and their anti-English, anti-Westminster nonsense.

Salmond was a Westminster MP for a long time, including some years when he was first Minister, claiming his supermarket shop on the taxpayer along with everyone else while shouting loudly about "Westminster" and corruption.

Why did he lie about getting advice on European membership? Why is he currently fighting to hide his hotel bills? Why have so many huge businesses said that they will leave? Economically, it will be a disaster. Even the most cautious of economists have said only that it "might" work after 10 years of hardship.

Why did Salmond produce a White Paper saying everyone currently living in Scotland would be a Scot -ie he was determining MY nationality for me.

I am British, first, foremost and forever.

Anyone asking you to vote Yes is living in a dreamworld where they believe someone's claims because he says so, without any evidence at all.

Report
withextradinosaurs · 14/04/2014 19:03

Thanks, East...I thought Wales was a Principality rather than a Kingdom?

Report
withextradinosaurs · 14/04/2014 19:06

I don't believe Westminster governs in Scotland's best interests. Most English people have no idea that Scotland has its own laws and its own education system, with a four year degree course leading to a Masters.

But I don't think Westminster governs in the interests of the north, either. If it did, perhaps we would still have a steel industry, a shipbuilding industry and successful coalmines.

Report
SantanaLopez · 14/04/2014 19:07

Why is he currently fighting to hide his hotel bills

The Telegraph dug them out at the weekend!

Report
Eastwiththem · 14/04/2014 19:15

Hmmm, I think a principality is the same as a kingdom but with a Prince rather than a King? I did know all this at uni but that was some years ago now!

Report
ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 14/04/2014 19:19

Under international law, debts and assets have to be shared

Only if Scotland is considered a continuing country along with rUK. In this scenario iScotland would also carry on with all treaties etc that the UK was signatory to (except where the specifics of the split preclude this)

If Scotland is considered a successor state it is a clean slate. IScotland takes no share of UK assets or UK debts. This is not defaulting on the debt - it simly would have nothing to do with iScotland which would be a brand new country.

Report
BumPotato · 14/04/2014 19:21

I'm a Yes person, and strongly object to being described as anti-English. It's about Scotland taking control of her own affairs. It is about the people of Scotland getting a government they vote for (the Scottish vote makes no difference to who governs in Westminster, ever).

Report
BigBoobiedBertha · 14/04/2014 19:22

Thanks Santana. The yes voters keep saying that the yes vote isn't a vote for Salmond and I fully understand that the referendum is on the yes/no question and nothing else.

However I presume the team will be weighted according to the seats held in the Scottish parliament, so the wishes of party with the most seats will prevail in negotiations and therefore, in a sense, it does matter who is in charge surely? Salmond will be leading the negotiations, won't he? I am just a bit confused about why some people are saying this isn't about personalities when they seem to be very relevant to me.

I am just an interested bystander being mostly English, btw. I have no say in any of this despite the fact that the future of the union in which I live is being decided by a small percentage of its population. Perhaps the rest of us would be justified in saying whether we think Scotland should stay or go too since it affects us all. Wink

Report
RoxyRobin · 14/04/2014 19:24

Nothing to do with the serious point at issue but I had to laugh when I saw that someone in the Telegraph's comments section referred to Salmond as 'The Clootie Dumpling of Doom.' Grin

Sorry to lower the tone.

Report
BigBoobiedBertha · 14/04/2014 19:27
Grin
Report
OldLadyKnowsSomething · 14/04/2014 19:27

Bertha, the negotiating team for iScotland will be made up of relevant economic, legal etc experts, with maybe a politician or two chucked in, it won't be party-political. These issues are far too important.

Report
PigletJohn · 14/04/2014 19:29

weatherall Mon 14-Apr-14 18:35:02
Sally- during the negotiation period between 19th September 2014 and Independence Day on 26th march 2016 Scotland will be as much a part of the UK as at the moment.

We will not be a 'foreign country' during the negotiations.

And during that period, you will be a part of the UK, so will have the protection of the Pound Sterling. If a Scottish bank goes bust, the BoE will guarantee to bail it out.

Once (if) you become an independent, foreign country, that stops.

Report
grovel · 14/04/2014 19:29

BumPotato, you won't be taking control of your affairs with a currency union.

OP posts:
Report
luckypeach · 14/04/2014 19:31

To the PP who said that the referendum is not about voting for or against AS. You have got to be joking?! This man doesn't care what policies are in place as long as the end result is the breaking up of the UK. It very much is all about him. Why not have more devolution rather than 'independence' then?

It wasn't that long ago that AS stated 'the pound was an albatross around (Scotland's) neck'. So he'll clutch at straws, saying whatever people want to hear. It is sadly a dangerous and divisive debate, not just for Scotland but for the UK as a whole.

Report
BigBoobiedBertha · 14/04/2014 19:34

Thanks OldLady - Well that is a bit more encouraging. I shudder to think what it would be like with the politicians in charge but then I am feeling cynical about politicians at the moment given that I have Maria Miller as my MP.Hmm

Report
ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 14/04/2014 19:34

Why not have more devolution rather than 'independence' then?

Because WM shows no appetite for further devolution, and insisted that the "devo-max" option was removed from the referendum ballot paper.

Report
caroldecker · 14/04/2014 19:34

bumpotato Scotland gave us the current coalition - without Scotland's 59 (Labour) seats, the conservatives would have won 306 out of 591 seats, so held a majority.

Report
ithaka · 14/04/2014 19:36

In our hoose we refer to Salmond as 'the hypnotoad' - if you watch Futurama, you will know how apt it is.

Has to be said in special 'hypnotoad' voice.

Report
BumPotato · 14/04/2014 19:36

That's an interesting twist on it carol

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

PeachandRaspberry · 14/04/2014 19:38

Clootie dumpling of doom Grin

Beautiful!

Report
OldLadyKnowsSomething · 14/04/2014 19:40

It's not about Eck at all. The question is, should Scotland be an independent country? It's not, do you want an SNP gvt in perpetuity, with Eck installed as President for life?

Sheesh.

Report
PeachandRaspberry · 14/04/2014 19:41

If it isn't about Salmond, then it's not about the Tories and that's all the Yes Campaign ever squeal about.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.