pettyprudence
flatpack I would love to know where you get your figures from (particulrly 1 million by 2017)?
That's my estimate. When the government allowed Poles and other migrants in early and without limits, its estimate for total migration was out by a factor of 5. I think that the current estimates are also likely to be out by the same.
I like the website you link to - it shows that there has been some growth in the Romanian economy, a small dip in unempolyment after some growth and a drop in net migration. And the latest figures show that 21% of Romanians live below the poverty line (although I agree its a very different poverty line to that of the UK). They also seem to be doing fairly well with industrial production.
In 20 years time, they may be ready to join the EU.
GothAnneGeddes
1) I live just outside of Birmingham in an a hugely multi-cultural area, with lots of immigration from the Windrush era right up until the present day. I am also married to a Non-EU immigrant, now UK citizen, so have personal experience of the UK immigration system.
That isn't personal experience of the UK immigration system. Nor does it have any bearing here apart from as a tool for you to imply your social superiority. Sorry, that only works on Guardian readers, not on me.
2) EU citizens cannot claim asylum. Repeat: they cannot claim asylum. As discussed upthread, there is no instant benefits or housing for them, others have described the process in greater detail, I suggest you go and read it.
I never said they could. Repeat: I never said they could.
I suggest you re-read my post in greater detail.
As for your comments about what is real poverty and what is not... I was going to go into a discussion about methods of measuring poverty and that it important to look not just as poverty but at social inequality too, but considering that you're probably the sort of person who'd start ranting about flat-screen televisions, I can't be bothered.
I'm sure you're the sort of person who is so convinced of their moral superiority that they can't imagine for a moment that anyone could question their authority.
What a shame you have no actual arguments and so you resort to arguing about things you imagine I might have said.
As pretty stated, both Romania and Bulgaria are predicted to have economic growth, also travel patterns vary from country to country, Italy is likely to be a more attractive option for Romanians then the UK, for example.
I can 'predict' economic growth. Doesn't mean it's going to happen. And why on earth would Romanians go to Italy? Not only are there no jobs there for anyone but Italians, there's casual violence against Roma and they don't speak Italian?
Hungary is a long term EU member, yet has had very little outward migration, despite also having similar economic issues, the same goes for Estonia and Slovenia.
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estonians Estonia has the largest outward migration of any of the 27 EU nations.]
Do you even check your facts before you make spurious claims , or do you imagine that your Multi-Culti credentials mean that you don't have to?
mathanxiety
So as of today, Flatpack, Romanians can't actually claim a house, etc. ?
My post specifically said 'next year'. I wrote 'next year' and I meant 'next year'.
They will have to wait until next year to do that? In the meantime, are they 'claiming houses'?
No. Nor will they be able to use the asylum system to do so.
It's funny, but I notice a theme here. I notice an awful lot of people trying to address arguments I never made.