Ola, I think the are many problems with NOT telling adopted children difficult information about their past
It's THEIR information so they have a moral right to it
Other people have that information and can live with it, so why not the child
If you lie to them when they area child, at what age do you confess this and then teell the truth?
Most important, they often have lived through neglect and abuse and always rejection, abandonment and loss. They still have the feelings and memories of it, but often not the words to express it, especially if it happened when they were pre verbal
So when we lie to them about their past, they suffer even more of a disconnect , they learn to not trust themselves, their own bodies and feelings and us. They blame themselves for feeling ( or often being) so bad when the blame lies elsewhere.
Imagine if you were raped and you had your family and friends telling you " no it wasn't rape, you consented. Besides it wasn't his fault as he was drunk , he loved you really" etc etc. Would that make it easier to get over the experince?
If our children have removed from neglectful or abusive birth parenst, why woudl we tell them lies about loving parenst who gave them away because they were too poor/young/homeless etc?
I understand that it's easier for adults to not tell children, under the pretense that it's protecting them. But often it's to protect the adult from having to deal with their own and the children feelings
So no, I don't think that adopted children nowadays are told " too mush information" . Their past are often more difficult than the babies relinquished in the 1950s and 60s. But they will deserve the truth