Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

The BBC knew about Scott Mills at least a year ago

32 replies

ProudAmberTurtle · 31/03/2026 19:08

It's being reported tonight that an unnamed "former BBC presenter" made allegations about Scott Mills to the corporation in May 2025, but the BBC did nothing about them.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/breaking-bbc-knew-scott-mills-36951242

It's scarcely believable that the BBC did nothing given that the Huw Edwards conviction was just a few months earlier, but it does appear to be the case.

Major Scott Mills update as BBC knew about allegations a year ago

The BBC’s decision to sack Scott Mills relates to a 2016 police investigation into “serious sexual offences” against a teenage boy

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/breaking-bbc-knew-scott-mills-36951242

OP posts:
TotoandFredo · 01/04/2026 17:34

LindorDoubleChoc · 01/04/2026 16:38

Why have you started a new thread about this? I wish HQ would close this sort of duplicate thread down. It all gets so very tedious.

You don’t have to click on posts you aren’t interested in you know.

ThereAreOnlyShadesOfGrey · 01/04/2026 17:46

I think this sort of thing creates a dangerous precedent.

Don’t get me wrong, if someone is guilty of a crime they need to be brought to justice.

But the truth is that no charges were brought here. And yet here people are in a position where they’re essentially hanging a man out to dry based on an allegation which was unproven.

Yes, an allegation was made. Do we know it was true? No we don’t.

And the reality is that the more we become a society where we start on the assumption that someone is guilty until proven innocent as opposed to the other way around, the more we create a platform for people to feel enabled to ruin someone’s life and gain notoriety in their own right with a false allegation, especially a celebrity.

Let’s not pretend that there aren’t people out there who absolutely do and have made false allegations against celebrities. It happens whether we like to admit it or not.

These kinds of details need to be kept out of the press until proper investigations are carried out. And if there are no charges, then these details should never become public knowledge. Ever.

LindorDoubleChoc · 01/04/2026 17:51

I am interested🙄. I'm already on a thread, why can't any updates be posted on the one thread?

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

TotoandFredo · 01/04/2026 17:58

LindorDoubleChoc · 01/04/2026 17:51

I am interested🙄. I'm already on a thread, why can't any updates be posted on the one thread?

Why does it matter though? That said if you want decent updates all in one place, Tattle is much better (probably shouldn’t say than on MN). They tend to me more up to date and more in the know 🙂

OP posts:
Anon501178 · 01/04/2026 22:21

ThereAreOnlyShadesOfGrey · 01/04/2026 17:46

I think this sort of thing creates a dangerous precedent.

Don’t get me wrong, if someone is guilty of a crime they need to be brought to justice.

But the truth is that no charges were brought here. And yet here people are in a position where they’re essentially hanging a man out to dry based on an allegation which was unproven.

Yes, an allegation was made. Do we know it was true? No we don’t.

And the reality is that the more we become a society where we start on the assumption that someone is guilty until proven innocent as opposed to the other way around, the more we create a platform for people to feel enabled to ruin someone’s life and gain notoriety in their own right with a false allegation, especially a celebrity.

Let’s not pretend that there aren’t people out there who absolutely do and have made false allegations against celebrities. It happens whether we like to admit it or not.

These kinds of details need to be kept out of the press until proper investigations are carried out. And if there are no charges, then these details should never become public knowledge. Ever.

No charges doesn't necessarily mean no crime committed though....
No smoke without fire in most cases.
Something clearly happened.

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 01/04/2026 22:29

@Anon501178 The BBC cannot investigate what happened 26 plus years ago though can it? This isn’t about him being “guilty”. The police or CPS took it no further. As a result he’s innocent in the eyes of the law. You thinking something isn’t good enough.
I agree @ThereAreOnlyShadesOfGrey it’s quite dangerous to sack someone on public opinion. However they will hang it on reputation damage to the BBC. It’s part of their discipline policy since last summer. It’s very much about what’s happened with other employees and why the bbc are now super cautious. SM has said it’s about this

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread