Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Why did Labour vote against having an inquiry into the rape gangs?

49 replies

Puzzled89 · 19/02/2026 19:51

I genuinely don't understand why they voted against this? Why would anyone trust a government that votes against the Pakistani rape/grooming gang inquiry?

OP posts:
AmberDreams · 19/02/2026 20:30

It would upset a huge chunk of their voter base.

It’s abhorrent to think that is more important to them than 1,000’s of girls who were raped but that’s where we find ourselves.

TooBigForMyBoots · 19/02/2026 20:30

To focus on implementing the recommendations from previous inquiries.

HumphreyCobblers · 19/02/2026 20:31

The enquiry was general and spent very little time on the rape gangs - I think less than a week and interviewed one person relating to them. Certainly the women themselves did not feel adequate investigation had taken place. I am glad people are now listening to them.

Simonjt · 19/02/2026 20:35

There has already been one, its a bit odd people are pretending there hasn’t been one. If the UK has another it severely delays implentations from the first, so people who want a second one actually was to delay positive change, so they want to protect rapists.

Playingvideogames · 19/02/2026 20:38

Because Labour are desperate for the Muslim vote and got it until a couple of years ago when Muslim areas started to elect their own ‘independent’ candidates who seem very predominantly concerned with Gaza and ensuring cousin marriage stays legal.

I think they’ve lost the Muslim vote now so are happy to ‘change their mind’

SeriousFaffing · 19/02/2026 20:39

Simonjt · 19/02/2026 20:35

There has already been one, its a bit odd people are pretending there hasn’t been one. If the UK has another it severely delays implentations from the first, so people who want a second one actually was to delay positive change, so they want to protect rapists.

Exactly. But we can’t let any sort of retribution for the victims get in the way of the white men wanting their pound of tactical flesh.

Applecup · 19/02/2026 20:42

OnlyReplyToIdiots · 19/02/2026 19:57

Why did the Conservatives vote against it when they were in power?

Ah yes. Let’s blame the tories.

Bringemout · 19/02/2026 20:43

Simonjt · 19/02/2026 20:35

There has already been one, its a bit odd people are pretending there hasn’t been one. If the UK has another it severely delays implentations from the first, so people who want a second one actually was to delay positive change, so they want to protect rapists.

You can do both, you can table legislation now. New women are coming forward to the Lowe enquiry to talk about what happened to them because they trust him and those leading the enquiry, whatever you think of Lowe, it’s an utter indictment of both Labour and the Tories for their inaction.

HumphreyCobblers · 19/02/2026 20:45

Goodness all of you ascribing malevolent motivation to those wanting an enquiry, have you listened to the testimony that has been delivered by these women? I defy anyone to hear the victims and still maintain that their stories should not have been heard. The previous enquiry did not give these victims a chance to be heard.

CornishTiger · 19/02/2026 20:49

This was my local MPs response to this question in a local group.

As some of you may be aware, the Labour Government is actually launching an independent inquiry. As you know, this is a topic I take very seriously, so I was pleased to see that in December, the Home Secretary gave a statement on this independent inquiry into grooming gangs, the appointment of its chair and panel, and the inquiry’s terms of reference.

This follows the recommendation of Baroness Casey, who had been working on a review into child sexual exploitation and institutional responses, back in June last year. Our Government had already, since it came to power, adopted all 21 recommendations of the Casey Review in relation to institutional failures, whilst previous Governments failed to act. It has now been announced that this will be chaired by Baroness Anne Longfield, who was the Children’s Commissioner from 2015 to 2021 and has devoted her life to children’s rights.

Alongside her, Zoë Billingham CBE – a former inspector at His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and chair of Norfolk and Suffolk NHS foundation trust – and Eleanor Kelly CBE – the former chief executive of Southwark council – will be panellists. I am glad that the chair and panel, each recommended by Baroness Casey, bring experience of championing children’s rights, knowledge of policing and local government, and a proven track record of holding powerful institutions to account.

To answer your question directly, to be clear, we did not vote against the Tory motion last January because we were against the idea of a national inquiry. We voted against a Tory Parliamentary stunt that would have killed off a new law to safeguard children. This is because the amendment was attached to the most important child protection legislation in over a decade, which would have been killed if the vote had passed.

Furthermore, I also welcome the Government’s announcement that this inquiry will be completed within three years, supported by a £65 million budget. A further £3.65 million will be committed in 2025 to the policing operation, survivor support and research into grooming gangs. The inquiry is focused on child sexual abuse committed by grooming gangs, and will explicitly consider the background of offenders, including their ethnicity and religion, and whether the authorities failed to properly investigate what happened out of a misplaced desire to protect community cohesion.

There is a clear and consistent theme here of populist politicians choosing to whip people up rather than the focusing on the substance of the issue - it is curious, in itself, that this debate has resurfaced now, despite the fact that there is a national inquiry beginning. In many cases such as that of Rupert Lowe MP, they have shown their contempt for the safety of women and girls by defending X amid the Grok scandal of sexualised images being generated and by accepting nearly £40k since the 2024 election.

I believe that the inquiry must place victims and survivors at the forefront, and I believe it is right that a charter will set out how they will participate and how their views, experiences and testimony will shape the inquiry’s work.

You can access the Home Secretary’s full statement here: www.gov.uk/government/speeches/independent-inquiry-into-grooming-gangs and I can assure you that I will continue to monitor developments very closely.

Bringemout · 19/02/2026 20:49

HumphreyCobblers · 19/02/2026 20:45

Goodness all of you ascribing malevolent motivation to those wanting an enquiry, have you listened to the testimony that has been delivered by these women? I defy anyone to hear the victims and still maintain that their stories should not have been heard. The previous enquiry did not give these victims a chance to be heard.

Exactly, I have to make myself read some of these statements, your heart just bleeds for them.

Bringemout · 19/02/2026 20:51

CornishTiger · 19/02/2026 20:49

This was my local MPs response to this question in a local group.

As some of you may be aware, the Labour Government is actually launching an independent inquiry. As you know, this is a topic I take very seriously, so I was pleased to see that in December, the Home Secretary gave a statement on this independent inquiry into grooming gangs, the appointment of its chair and panel, and the inquiry’s terms of reference.

This follows the recommendation of Baroness Casey, who had been working on a review into child sexual exploitation and institutional responses, back in June last year. Our Government had already, since it came to power, adopted all 21 recommendations of the Casey Review in relation to institutional failures, whilst previous Governments failed to act. It has now been announced that this will be chaired by Baroness Anne Longfield, who was the Children’s Commissioner from 2015 to 2021 and has devoted her life to children’s rights.

Alongside her, Zoë Billingham CBE – a former inspector at His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and chair of Norfolk and Suffolk NHS foundation trust – and Eleanor Kelly CBE – the former chief executive of Southwark council – will be panellists. I am glad that the chair and panel, each recommended by Baroness Casey, bring experience of championing children’s rights, knowledge of policing and local government, and a proven track record of holding powerful institutions to account.

To answer your question directly, to be clear, we did not vote against the Tory motion last January because we were against the idea of a national inquiry. We voted against a Tory Parliamentary stunt that would have killed off a new law to safeguard children. This is because the amendment was attached to the most important child protection legislation in over a decade, which would have been killed if the vote had passed.

Furthermore, I also welcome the Government’s announcement that this inquiry will be completed within three years, supported by a £65 million budget. A further £3.65 million will be committed in 2025 to the policing operation, survivor support and research into grooming gangs. The inquiry is focused on child sexual abuse committed by grooming gangs, and will explicitly consider the background of offenders, including their ethnicity and religion, and whether the authorities failed to properly investigate what happened out of a misplaced desire to protect community cohesion.

There is a clear and consistent theme here of populist politicians choosing to whip people up rather than the focusing on the substance of the issue - it is curious, in itself, that this debate has resurfaced now, despite the fact that there is a national inquiry beginning. In many cases such as that of Rupert Lowe MP, they have shown their contempt for the safety of women and girls by defending X amid the Grok scandal of sexualised images being generated and by accepting nearly £40k since the 2024 election.

I believe that the inquiry must place victims and survivors at the forefront, and I believe it is right that a charter will set out how they will participate and how their views, experiences and testimony will shape the inquiry’s work.

You can access the Home Secretary’s full statement here: www.gov.uk/government/speeches/independent-inquiry-into-grooming-gangs and I can assure you that I will continue to monitor developments very closely.

Many survivors refused to participate. Why is that if Labour were doing such a bang up job? These women have out themselves out there to talk about horrific abuse and deep trauma, they want to engage. Why did they feel they can’t engage with the government?

surrealpotato · 19/02/2026 20:51

Because they're a bunch of useless, spineless, slithering Communists?

Marmalademorning · 19/02/2026 20:52

Probably because most of it happened in areas with Labour run Councils.

Smeuse · 19/02/2026 20:53

The Jay report came out in 2022

Treacling · 19/02/2026 21:07

Lowe’s inquiry has apparently found grooming to be more widespread than first thought. They seem to have reopened the ability to report as more women have come forward. I saw it on SM earlier.

https://transcripts.openjusticeuk.org/

These transcripts at open justice are a few court transcripts and a very hard read. (Trigger warning).

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Xk1V7PXPbc8

This link is Katie Lam in parliament -she says a social worker was a guest at a victims wedding to her groomer. The child was then fostered by her groomers parents. No one has been prosecuted.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=DLJrKLW8YGE&pp=ygUWUnVwZXJ0IGxvd2UgcmFwZSBnYW5ncw%3D%3D

The opening to The Rape Gang inquiry.

What also upset me was how little was on MN about grooming gangs last year. I’ve been on here for a long time. There were lots of wo/men on here giving reasons as to why an inquiry should not be done but not many threads and not much support for victims , it was depressing and I reduced how much I came on here.

I discussed this with a friend recently and they pointed out there are so many women and men that knew about these crimes who have a vested interested in silencing those that speak up as they are complicit and they also want it swept under the rug. It really made me think. If say 200k girls are affected - how many knew and did nothing - terrifying tbh. I hope they are prosecuted privately.

The Transcripts

Court-issued sentencing remarks with editorial commentary

https://transcripts.openjusticeuk.org

Ritasueandbobtoo9 · 19/02/2026 21:12

Possibly something to do with the 55 odd Labour councillors who have been convicted of sexual offences. That the ones who have been convicted. I don’t vote for one or other and as a consequence my feeds are sending me stuff from all sides.

EasternStandard · 19/02/2026 21:14

HumphreyCobblers · 19/02/2026 20:45

Goodness all of you ascribing malevolent motivation to those wanting an enquiry, have you listened to the testimony that has been delivered by these women? I defy anyone to hear the victims and still maintain that their stories should not have been heard. The previous enquiry did not give these victims a chance to be heard.

So awful.

OnlyReplyToIdiots · 19/02/2026 21:21

Applecup · 19/02/2026 20:42

Ah yes. Let’s blame the tories.

I’m not, I’m asking the question… both the current and previous official oppositions have called for them… both the current and previous Governments have rejected the calls…

Bringemout · 19/02/2026 21:36

Treacling · 19/02/2026 21:07

Lowe’s inquiry has apparently found grooming to be more widespread than first thought. They seem to have reopened the ability to report as more women have come forward. I saw it on SM earlier.

https://transcripts.openjusticeuk.org/

These transcripts at open justice are a few court transcripts and a very hard read. (Trigger warning).

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Xk1V7PXPbc8

This link is Katie Lam in parliament -she says a social worker was a guest at a victims wedding to her groomer. The child was then fostered by her groomers parents. No one has been prosecuted.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=DLJrKLW8YGE&pp=ygUWUnVwZXJ0IGxvd2UgcmFwZSBnYW5ncw%3D%3D

The opening to The Rape Gang inquiry.

What also upset me was how little was on MN about grooming gangs last year. I’ve been on here for a long time. There were lots of wo/men on here giving reasons as to why an inquiry should not be done but not many threads and not much support for victims , it was depressing and I reduced how much I came on here.

I discussed this with a friend recently and they pointed out there are so many women and men that knew about these crimes who have a vested interested in silencing those that speak up as they are complicit and they also want it swept under the rug. It really made me think. If say 200k girls are affected - how many knew and did nothing - terrifying tbh. I hope they are prosecuted privately.

Yeah I find it depressing as well, how many are talking about Epstein and are rightly horrified but can’t spare a thought for children in the UK they absolutely could do something about, who are most likely still being abused.

I find it extraordinary but also I think it illuminates how this all happened in the first place. I’m asian, I’m not a fan of racism, however if you are raping children, then I’d like you to be castrated and then kicked off a plane over the atlantic. I don’t consider exposing child rapists to be racist, i consider that to be justice for children and people who experienced horrific crimes as children. Theres a moral rot at the heart of Britain , we contort ourselves to excuse people who would harm others so we can feel compassionate, but never towards the victims, always towards the perpetrators.

Theres number of times I’ve seen “it was out of character” no it fucking wasn’t, you just misunderstood what that persons character was, your perception of their public and private faces is faulty. I can understand how you may accidentally kill another humanbeing, there are no circumstances in which rape is necessary or accidental it’s one of those crimes that there is zero justification for. Men who rape are beyond redemption imo.

cricketnut77 · 19/02/2026 22:54

Look at their seats in inner cities. Which community dominates? There's your answer

Treacling · 19/02/2026 23:08

It is mindblowing that Britain had to crowd fund a rape gang inquiry. Members of the public donated £20-100 here and there so raped girls could get justice and be heard.

It’s ridiculous. Crowd funding used to be for surgery or playground equipment etc.

Now it has to be used to get justice for raped children.

And MNetters avoid talking about raped kids as they fear offending adults on here. Incredible.

sleepwouldbenice · 19/02/2026 23:17

Figgygal · 19/02/2026 20:00

Because they're had been a long running costly one already under the Tories who implemented none of the recommendations in it.
Labour initially felt they should work with that to avoid delay.
Which seems entirely sensible.
The previous inquest chair recommended otherwise so they accepted that
Again seems entirely reasonable

Yep this what I remember
i specifically recall them saying they would appoint someone to check that their thought processes were right. She said they weren’t so they went with her trusted view

this is what I hate about the U turn count
yes there have been several but this isn’t one of them
even the victims disagreed as to the next steps

New posts on this thread. Refresh page