Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Did there used to be dark chocolate and plain chocolate as different things?

31 replies

KatyMac · 07/05/2025 09:55

Did they taste different?

The chocolate on Fry's chocolate cream and, say, Bournville?

Am I misremembering

OP posts:
Needmorelego · 07/05/2025 18:35

Possibly did.
Milk chocolate is different depending on brand (ie Cadbury tastes different to Galaxy).
I've never really liked Bournville - i find it bitter. But I love Frys chocolate (the creams).

Talipesmum · 07/05/2025 18:38

no, I think dark chocolate was often called plain chocolate. Different types of plain / dark chocolate would have tasted different, same as different milk chocolate brands have different tastes.

My kids hadn’t heard the term until we mentioned it recently, but after thinking about it, they declared that “plain” chocolate ought to refer to milk chocolate, since it’s the “normal” aka “plain” type. But what do they know!

ViaRia01 · 07/05/2025 18:38

I always thought that plain chocolate was the same as dark chocolate and I’ve used the terms interchangeably. I sort of associate plain chocolate with baking and dark chocolate with eating, but that could just be me. Happy to be corrected on this though.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

AllProperTeaIsTheft · 07/05/2025 18:39

No, plain chocolate was just what people often used to call dark chocolate.

myplace · 07/05/2025 18:39

Dark and plain are the same. Sometimes even called bitter chocolate.

Different brands will have tasted different.

Bourneville was the only dark chocolate bar in the 70s, though there used to be one with orange and nut pieces in the 80s.

Chocolate was very basic.

IridescentRainbow · 07/05/2025 18:40

ViaRia01 · 07/05/2025 18:38

I always thought that plain chocolate was the same as dark chocolate and I’ve used the terms interchangeably. I sort of associate plain chocolate with baking and dark chocolate with eating, but that could just be me. Happy to be corrected on this though.

I agree!

Tryingtokeepgoing · 07/05/2025 18:42

Bournville always used to have a fairly low cocoa content, when compared to modern dark chocolate which tends to be 70/80 or even 90%. I think Bournville was around 40/50%.

GildedRage · 07/05/2025 18:43

From a baking perspective dark chocolate was (and continues) to be available as unsweetened and semi sweet, both in dark and milk. Different brands have different “flavour”.

minnienono · 07/05/2025 18:46

Dark and plain are the same thing, what changes is the cocoa content and where the cocoa was farmed, location changes flavour!

Needmorelego · 07/05/2025 18:52

Looking at some vintage pictures Bournville is described as "Plain Chocolate" (actually "Plain Flavour" 🙂)
Black Magic (made by Rowntree) are described as "Dark Chocolates".
(pictures incoming....)

Did there used to be dark chocolate and plain chocolate as different things?
marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 07/05/2025 21:42

myplace · 07/05/2025 18:39

Dark and plain are the same. Sometimes even called bitter chocolate.

Different brands will have tasted different.

Bourneville was the only dark chocolate bar in the 70s, though there used to be one with orange and nut pieces in the 80s.

Chocolate was very basic.

Black Magic? (And in the 60s, for that matter).

myplace · 07/05/2025 21:54

marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 07/05/2025 21:42

Black Magic? (And in the 60s, for that matter).

Boxes of chocolates, yes. Possibly chocolate coated nuts? But bars of chocolate, like dairy milk, not really.

myplace · 07/05/2025 21:55

Plain chocolate Bounty! Yum.

BeNiceWhenItsFinished · 07/05/2025 22:03

marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 07/05/2025 21:42

Black Magic? (And in the 60s, for that matter).

60's - 70's, the favourite in our house was Terrys All Gold. They were plain. Ooh, and Neapolitans, they had a whole variety of flavours in there, including plain. Also Frys Peppermint Cream, I think that was plain chocolate too.

We just called it plain chocolate and everybody knew what that meant.

Me? A chocoholic? No...........

ImDuranDuran · 07/05/2025 22:16

This has made me wonder if ‘cooking chocolate’ is still a thing…apparently it is (Tesco have it). Even better it doesn’t appear to have palm oil in it so may be nicer to snack on than most actual ‘eating’ chocolate available these days Hmm

Fifthtimelucky · 07/05/2025 22:25

AllProperTeaIsTheft · 07/05/2025 18:39

No, plain chocolate was just what people often used to call dark chocolate.

Some of us still do!

ErrolTheDragon · 07/05/2025 22:56

ImDuranDuran · 07/05/2025 22:16

This has made me wonder if ‘cooking chocolate’ is still a thing…apparently it is (Tesco have it). Even better it doesn’t appear to have palm oil in it so may be nicer to snack on than most actual ‘eating’ chocolate available these days Hmm

The ‘cooking chocolate’ I remember wasn’t nice to eat - I think the fats may have been different to help the melting and texture but you wouldn’t want more than a thin coating of it.

chaosmaker · 07/05/2025 23:01

I think dark was for eating and plain was for cooking.

70's Black Magic, yum but then again any Rowntrees was far better than awful gross nestle

GotToWearShades · 07/05/2025 23:08

I think Plain is what we used to call Dark, but it wasn't as sophisticated as modern Dark chocolate in the same way as Dairy Milk isn't like Lindt or Milk Chocolate from Hotel Choc

BlondiePortz · 07/05/2025 23:11

AllProperTeaIsTheft · 07/05/2025 18:39

No, plain chocolate was just what people often used to call dark chocolate.

That is what I think too

KatyMac · 08/05/2025 05:45

There was bounty, toffee crisp, occasional runs of mars/snickers/milky way as dark chocolate
Frys did 2 types of 5 centres, milk and dark
Mintola was dark

Trying to remember what else was dark

Terry's chocolates plus a dark orange

Grandparents had a sweetie shop so we had access to lindt, anton berg, Elizabeth shaw (I mean we also had those bloody seashells and ferro rocher when they were still 'posh')

We had boxes of dark choc ginger, brazils, mqrzipans, rose/violet/peppermint/coffee creams to be weighed out & jars of dark chocolate raisins and peanuts

Struggling to remember - but I get hung up of the difference between plain and dark, still think there was a difference

OP posts:
ImDuranDuran · 08/05/2025 07:08

ErrolTheDragon · 07/05/2025 22:56

The ‘cooking chocolate’ I remember wasn’t nice to eat - I think the fats may have been different to help the melting and texture but you wouldn’t want more than a thin coating of it.

Yes I remember stealing some as a child while my mum made whatever she was making and being sorely disappointed at the taste Sad

Tiredpigeon · 08/05/2025 08:31

I remember this, too. We referred to Bourneville as plain but anything that was 75% cocoa or more, like Lindt, would be 'dark'.

olderbutwiser · 08/05/2025 08:54

I thought Mum was amazingly sophisticated because she liked Bournville chocolate and Black Magic chocolates. (“Who knows the secrets of the Black Magic Box?”). I still love Fry’s Peppermint Cream and who else remembers the Mixed Fruit one with different flavoured fondant in each bite.

Cooking Chocolate was rubbish though, all fat and no flavour.

Pinkflowersinavase · 24/05/2025 12:25

I've just been eating Bournville lately, they have new buttons out. I noticed the back of the pack says min 35% cocoa solids... that's not high at all , did it used to be more?