https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sports-and-active-living/articles/10.3389/fspor.2022.941482/full
This paper, which outlines the psychological effects of being dropped on these boys, also states that only 0.012% will play professionally, and that, of those 16 year old academy attendees offered scholarships, 98% won’t be playing at 18 years.
Of the 1.5 million boys who play organized youth football (soccer) in England, only ~180 will be signed professionally by a Premier League club, a success rate of 0.012% (Calvin, 2017). In 2011, 13,612 boys made up the professional football academy system in England. Despite this, 50% of all academy players leave the system before they are 16 (Premier League, 2012). Furthermore, ~98% of players awarded with an academy scholarship by English clubs at 16 are no longer playing in the top five tiers of English football at 18 (Calvin, 2017).
If only 2% of successful 16 year olds at an academy are still playing at 18, why are academies even allowed to seduce under 10s (and their parents)?
It’d be interesting to find out the comparative stats of 20 year olds playing high level football in the UK - who came through an academy vs who came through the conventional club system.
Im highly wary of parents - and unethical coaches - who project adult motivations and training schedules onto young children. Not just in sport, that includes young academic or music prodigies studying or playing for hours because “love it”. They tend to be feted as children but things don’t go well in adulthood.
Of course, an 8 year old who is good at football is going to say he wants to play professionally as an adult. But joining an academy, playing and travelling and training to the detriment of other sports and activities is pointless before puberty, especially when it seems that only 2% of successful 16 year old academy players are still playing at a high level 2 years later. What’s wrong with joining a local club and progressing organically through there?