There is an issue with BUPA and their anaesthetists. It’s in the press.
In a nutshell, despite premiums and profits going up, I understand that the surgeons and anaesthetists have not had a pay rise in 25 years.
so if they were paid £100 for a procedure 25 years ago, they are paid £100 now.
As a result, hundreds of anaesthetists have deregistered from BUPA, which means that they still operate on BUPA patients but are not ‘fee assured.’ So they set their own fee rather than being paid whatever BUPA are willing to pay them.
I wonder if the ones who remain ‘fee assured’ might be the ones who have too much to lose by rocking the boat with BUPA, perhaps because they have not long qualified as a consultant, or because they have come in from abroad and don’t feel in a strong position.
So basically if you have an operation on BUPA, you may have to pay the anaesthetist yourself. I understand that currently BUPA are allowing their patients to claim this back, but im not sure that’s due to continue. I can’t imagine that BUPA have publicised this to their policy holders, and I’m sure that they will find you a ‘fee assured’ anaesthetist, but that does not equate to finding you the best anaesthetist, it just means that they will find you one who is are willing to be paid whatever they choose to
pay them.
I’m not personally supportive of making huge profits and charging increased premiums without paying staff properly, and this influenced my decision to choose a
different provider when I recently decided to get private insurance. I also don’t want to choose from a pool of staff willing to be paid peanuts and I’m not reassured by the clever use of ‘assured.’
I expect there will be a ripple effect, however by that point, perhaps the other providers will have seen the chaos this has caused for BUPA and proactively pay staff correctly before they have the same issues.
I imagine the surgeons are watching with interest, as in some cases I suspect that their anaesthetists are now earning more than them for the same operation.