How about this as a logical way to think it out if the numbers don't immediately suggest anything to you.
You want the least number of pieces so start with the longest section
1 x 2.2 = 2.2
2 x 2.2 = 4.4
3× 2.2 = 6.6
Can you get to 4 or 6? Not exactly so try adding the next longest piece
2.2 +1.7 = 3.9 close but no 0.1s available
2.2 + 0.9 = 3.1 so keep going
2.2 + 0.9 + 0.9 = 4 bingo
Now I'm wondering if drawing a tree would help to work out what lengths are possible.
Start with 2.2 add each option in turn
(If you call the lengths a,b and c you're working out
a + a,b or c then b+ b or c then c+c gives all combinations of two pieces.
next level branches similar
a+ a + a,b or c then a+b+ b or c etc to end up with all combinations of 3 pieces.)
Rubbish formatting but first line one piece second line 2 pieces etc
......................................2.2....................................1.7..........................0.9
4.4.......................3.9................3.1 3.4.............2.6 1.8
6.6x....6.1x...5.3 5.6....4.8 4.0* 5.1....4.3 3.5 2.7
X X X X ....5.7 X...6 5.2 4.4
Which shows you can get the required lengths with paths 2.2+0.9+0.9 and 1.7+1.7+1.7+0.9 and no other combinations with less pieces so you can be confident.