I'm suspect ds has scarlet fever, he had a high temperature for 3 days, developed red rash over torso and arms Friday evening, although temp came down yesterday still glassy eyed and lethargic, white followed by red tongue and white patches on tonsils.
Called 111 yesterday morning early, had callback 4pm from someone who said 'it could be strep' but they couldn't prescribe so I had to wait another 6 hrs from someone who might prescribe antibiotics. No call since but another text saying they're so busy and can't meet waiting times. I assume they will call at some point today (hopefully).
In the meantime ds twin has developed a temp and glassy eyes. Dd had 1 day of temp earlier in the week but no other symptoms.
The twins have a school event on Tuesday afternoon they are desperate to attend.
We are due to have Xmas next weekend with my elderly parents.
From what I've read online (NHS website) if strep is not treated with antibiotics the patient continues to be infectious for 2-3 wks after they recover.
Questions for any medics who happen to be around and willing/able to answer:
- If ds feels better today when they call will they still give antibiotics to stop him spreading it around?
- Will they give some for his twin who is now obv coming down with same thing or will I need to call again and restart the interminable wait times for twin separately?
- Will they give antibiotics for dd, assuming since she is in same house and unwell at same time as ds she must have had it but fought it better - to stop her spreading it around?
- If they don't give all dc antibiotics should they not go to school and/or not do Xmas at grandparents, to avoid potentially spreading it to vulnerable people?
I'm feeling a bit frustrated, because assuming their info about continued infectiousness is right then surely promptly giving antibiotics will prevent a whole raft of new cases being created and further overwhelming the 111 service?