SW made accusation to both parents “that the children had stated that parent A (who had custody of children) had been violent to parent B”...quickly adding “but neither parent should talk to children about it”. The accusation was false and both parents A and B knew it to be false and confirmed it was false.
To flush out the SW lie, Parent A documented the false accusation in an email asking why the children were being left with a parent (A) when accusations of violence were being made by the children about parent A. Shouldn’t the children be taken away from a parent where violence was alleged? This email copied in SW’s manager.
SW then denied children’s accusation had been made by the children in the written response to parent A with manager copied in. But an audio recording of the meeting exists which could be used with the Email to expose the lie.
Parent A didn’t follow it up with SS at the time through fear of SW retribution and fearing losing custody of the children. A SW who lies clearly can’t be trusted!
But parent A knows that this could be a highly dangerous tactic to try to flush out concerns about truly violent parents. What if parent A had beaten up the children for telling “lies” to the SW- when in fact the SW had made the false accusation of parent A’s violence!
This incident is eating away at Parent A because of the danger of violence which this tactic of “false accusation making” to try and flush out body language/ parental response poses to children in the future. The SW is still practising.
What professional guidelines are there about lying while evidence taking? Is this a minor infraction or a major professional issue worth reporting?