Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

New rules for Reform-run libraries after Pride row

48 replies

IwantToRetire · Yesterday 22:36

A Reform-led council has outlined proposals to govern displays in its libraries four months after the administration came under fire for banning LGBTQ+ Pride displays.

The new draft guidance, to be considered by a Staffordshire County Council scrutiny committee on Thursday, reveals which events will be marked with library displays, including local history, St George's Day, Remembrance Day and Armed Forces Day, as well as promotion for fostering and recycling in the county.

However, there is no place on the draft schedule for the year ahead for Pride, Black History Month or non-Christian cultural events.

The council said it wanted libraries to be politically neutral spaces open to everyone.

Councillors are due to vote on the draft guidance in November.

Article continues at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmz98k2q18pko

(Dont think this is the same Council as the one there was an ealier thread about.)

A woman with long brown hair is wearing a cardigan and holding a book. She is looking at a book shelf in a library.

Reform-led Staffordshire Council issues new rules for libraries

A decision to ban Pride displays in June across Staffordshire's libraries sparked controversy.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmz98k2q18pko

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
BackToLurk · Today 17:54

Talkinpeace · Today 17:04

The UK has twice as many South Asians - due to the Empire and Commonwealth - as it does Blacks (African and West Indian)

Black History Month is an American import that should be dropped from the UK calendar.
American kids do not learn about living under the Blitz, I fail to see why UK kids need to learn about Rosa Parks when the UK race situation was utterly different.

Libraries should be places to work and read and where children and their carers can get books to look at.

All of the themed events are virtue signalling and money wasting.

Armed Forces Day (formerly Veteran's Day) is an American import. Object to that too?

And without getting all "When's International Men's Day", South Asian Heritage Month is July - but then you presumably already knew that.

https://southasianheritage.org.uk/

Wishesandhorses · Today 17:45

'An Englishman's way of speaking absolutely classifies him
The moment he talks he makes some other Englishman despise him'

And at the moment political beliefs are so divisive that they cannot be represented in spaces and facilities intended to be equally welcoming to all.

It's a shame. But it's one of the many things transactivism has broken on its noisy, aggressive and destructive way. These things existed within a society that knew where the lines and boundaries were, and that only works until you have people who want to break those lines for their own benefit and lack the capacity to value anyone else. #whywecan'thavenicethings.

Thanks for that.

EssexLounger · Today 17:43

It's what's happened in the US and now the UK is where identity politics has taken over, where we seem to sneer at unifying national events and instead think that events that represent one particular segment of society is preferred.

Black history month is not inclusive and leads to the same old questions "what about white history month", the same with Pride and LGBT+² History Month "what about straight month" etc.

I think the last national event that seemed truly inclusive was the Olympics. Most Royal events are sneered at now.

IwantToRetire · Today 17:41

I said earlier in the thread, I think the problem is that as happens because of TRAs, what could have been a temporary display or leaflets or whatever has been ruined by the queer need to be in your face and aggressive.

Just like as happens with some feminist events where women have worked together to put on an event and the next thing you know it has been hijacked by Sisters Uncut.

But on a wider point as someone who is relatively old, and had parents who experienced WWII, what I really object to is Reform and this is why Suella Braverman fits in so well, is the vulgar exploitation of national events and history in a gross facile US way. All this flag waiving nonsense etc..

Of all the americanisation of the UK, eg prom night and whatever, this nauseating saccharine attitude to the armed forces makes me want to puke.

I suppose we can only be grateful that Trump hasn't somehow managed to get the contract for arranging Remembrance Day at the Cenotaph in London.

Not sure why Reform is including events that may sound "patriotic" but were not part of celebrations only a few decades ago, but are just faximiles of US type hyper nationalist show stoppers put on for tv.

OP posts:
Imdunfer · Today 17:40

BackToLurk · Today 13:10

This ahistorical nonsense that ignores the development of public libraries from the 19th century onwards.

And earlier, too, if you mean open to all rather than publicly funded. Chetham's in Manchester was the first in 1653, established by a "billionaire" mill owner with instructions that it was to open to anyone.

Imdunfer · Today 17:36

TransParentlyAnnoyed · Today 10:39

I'm in the UK, so: nope. Libraries were just public buildings with a bit of donated stock, gradually improved by governments before Labour took power in the 60s. Until then, they had no central funding to buy stock.

The 1964 Public Libraries Act created the network of educational centres we know today, which has survived austerity to provide free education, equality of Internet access, local history resources and places of sanctuary for people without any money at all. It exists because of popular movements, not philanthropy.

Its existence is a defiant kick against government by the rich, which resists the education of women and minorities.

Libraries have been places the poor and marginalised seek sanctuary in. They exist to support and stick up for them - especially marginalised children. Reform dislike that.

Edited

You are so ignorant. Can you not be bothered to research the establishment of libraries by benefactors?

IwantToRetire · Today 17:25

Talkinpeace · Today 17:04

The UK has twice as many South Asians - due to the Empire and Commonwealth - as it does Blacks (African and West Indian)

Black History Month is an American import that should be dropped from the UK calendar.
American kids do not learn about living under the Blitz, I fail to see why UK kids need to learn about Rosa Parks when the UK race situation was utterly different.

Libraries should be places to work and read and where children and their carers can get books to look at.

All of the themed events are virtue signalling and money wasting.

I think this is an example of where shared but untrue comments about a situation or event is made untrue by a fabricated catch all response.

First of all Black History Month in the US is not on at the same time as Black History Month in the UK. And if you bothered to look at the type of events happening in the UK very much focus on the Black and other Minority Ethnic groups in the UK. And as such are also part of the UK's history.

Although the comment about Rosa Parks maybe suggests that Black History Month in the UK is needed more than ever because clearly the work it has done in past illustrating the work and creativity of ME communities in the UK.

Someone up thread talked about how events like this get hijacked. As the trans movement has been. And one of the problems is our really sloppy mass media loves to go for the extreme incidents, rather than the overall facts.

So there are many events by and about BME women in the UK from posh events with Zadie Smith to local women's groups putting on events, and (shockingly) celebrations!

OP posts:
Talkinpeace · Today 17:04

The UK has twice as many South Asians - due to the Empire and Commonwealth - as it does Blacks (African and West Indian)

Black History Month is an American import that should be dropped from the UK calendar.
American kids do not learn about living under the Blitz, I fail to see why UK kids need to learn about Rosa Parks when the UK race situation was utterly different.

Libraries should be places to work and read and where children and their carers can get books to look at.

All of the themed events are virtue signalling and money wasting.

borntobequiet · Today 16:44

Gosh, I must have hallucinated our well-stocked, well run (by the council) smallish town public library in the 1950s. It had a particularly good children’s section. And of course the much larger and more imposing library in the nearest city.

BackToLurk · Today 13:10

TransParentlyAnnoyed · Today 10:39

I'm in the UK, so: nope. Libraries were just public buildings with a bit of donated stock, gradually improved by governments before Labour took power in the 60s. Until then, they had no central funding to buy stock.

The 1964 Public Libraries Act created the network of educational centres we know today, which has survived austerity to provide free education, equality of Internet access, local history resources and places of sanctuary for people without any money at all. It exists because of popular movements, not philanthropy.

Its existence is a defiant kick against government by the rich, which resists the education of women and minorities.

Libraries have been places the poor and marginalised seek sanctuary in. They exist to support and stick up for them - especially marginalised children. Reform dislike that.

Edited

This ahistorical nonsense that ignores the development of public libraries from the 19th century onwards.

BillieWiper · Today 11:37

Hoardasurass · Today 11:07

They are examples of things that have been promoted by libraries as part of black awareness and pride months.
And you are correct in stating that they don't belong in libraries

Yeah I didn't know they were in them. But they should still be able to celebrate all the cultures of the local community. Black History and Pride can still be celebrated. Without being political. Presuming some of the community are either/or brown or gay or just interested in social history.

EssexLounger · Today 11:23

One of the things that bores me is how political partisan things are. If Reform said that they support Gaza or stopping climate change then the Green Party would start moaning.

There is a Save Our Libraries group in Essex to stop libraries being closed. They have spent their resources this year on petitions and protests over the banning of Pride in libraries, which has got nothing to do with libraries staying open. I think the local Lib Dems are heavily involved, and a lot of nonsense over saying Nazis burning books in the 1930's because Pride is not promoted.

If the other parties don't like losing votes then they should look at what they did to make them lose voters.

GeneralPeter · Today 11:07

BillieWiper · Today 10:58

Sorry I don't understand what those things you've just said have to do with public libraries?

Then we agree!

My local libraries became a BLM-fest, which is not about being black but is a specific anti-capitalist, anti-carceral movement.

Pride in recent years hasn’t been about just being gay, but specifically about trans and trans rights.

Libraries are public resources and shouldn’t be campaigning vehicles.

Maybe I’m just very unlucky with my libraries but judging from others on this thread I’m not the only one.

Hoardasurass · Today 11:07

BillieWiper · Today 10:58

Sorry I don't understand what those things you've just said have to do with public libraries?

They are examples of things that have been promoted by libraries as part of black awareness and pride months.
And you are correct in stating that they don't belong in libraries

Hoardasurass · Today 11:03

@TransParentlyAnnoyed you really haven't got a clue about Carnagie his trust or the philanthropy he did.
He personally funded the construction of and stocking of 660 libraries in the UK alone including funding staffing, upkeep and future purchases etc with local governments contractually obligated to provide 10% of the running and maintenance costs. This was done from the late 1800s to his death in 1919 and his trust has continued to fund all of those libraries since including expanding many of their buildings including the one in his home town of Dunfermline which was expanded to 4× its original size in the last decade all funded by the Carnagie trust.
You can try and rewrite history with selective facts and misrepresentation but it won't work.
Libraries exist for everyone to have free access to books and learning not for the promotion of political ideologies or displaying sexulised imagery to children.

BillieWiper · Today 10:58

GeneralPeter · Today 10:00

Nothing inherently.

What’s political about overthrowing capitalism or abolishing prisons?

What’s political about removing sex-based rights and redefining woman in policy and law?

Quite a lot.

Some of those complaining about Reform’s actions had no problem with co-opting public infrastructure to do politics to others, and only now discover their objections once politics is being done to them.

Sorry I don't understand what those things you've just said have to do with public libraries?

EssexLounger · Today 10:56

Libraries are for the local community. I can't be bothered by the nonsense comment of the rich hating women and minorities being educated.

Reform led councils are run by locals who joined Reform as all the other parties ditched their principles to follow the establishment view on gender ideology and other matters, and the people were otherwise politically homeless.

In Essex Reform ditched the reservation fees in libraries, which then suddenly drew opposition and criticism because they were making libraries more affordable. They ditched the Pride flag being flown on the council building, which had got out of control because an official flag raising ceremony was created, which saw some local cross-dressing men invited to raise the flag etc.

Reform are a response to all the other parties ditching their principles. I fully expect a new Green party soon as the Green party are ditching their green principles in favour of Gaza.

TransParentlyAnnoyed · Today 10:39

Hoardasurass · Today 01:03

No libraries exist because philanthropists like Andrew Carnagie paid to create them so ordinary people could have access to books and knowledge when they were to poor to afford them.
Public libraries are supposed to be a place of learning for all not a place for political ideologies or indoctrination.

I'm in the UK, so: nope. Libraries were just public buildings with a bit of donated stock, gradually improved by governments before Labour took power in the 60s. Until then, they had no central funding to buy stock.

The 1964 Public Libraries Act created the network of educational centres we know today, which has survived austerity to provide free education, equality of Internet access, local history resources and places of sanctuary for people without any money at all. It exists because of popular movements, not philanthropy.

Its existence is a defiant kick against government by the rich, which resists the education of women and minorities.

Libraries have been places the poor and marginalised seek sanctuary in. They exist to support and stick up for them - especially marginalised children. Reform dislike that.

Hoardasurass · Today 10:30

ImmortalNowBabyDoll · Today 05:09

Are we getting rid of all the books about straight sexuality then? No more Cinderella, Snow White, Rapunzel?

Could you tell me when you last saw a library display about straight sex? With dilldos on display as was in the library lgbtq+ display that has triggered this motion.
Ofcourse you can't because it doesn't happen.
Nobody should have to walk past such things just to borrow a book especially not children.
Oh and fairytales aren't about straight sex btw

Ratherhaveacupofteaandabiscuit · Today 10:22

zanahoria · Today 09:41

I am more bothered about people talking on their mobiles in libraries or random nutters shouting than any political campaigns

I see all sorts of posters there but they don't make any bloody noise

I did add a bit of peace and quiet.

I am old enough to remember when it was whispering only in a library and wish it was still like this now.

BackToLurk · Today 10:15

FlirtsWithRhinos · Today 00:01

Why does it have to be either/or? What's wrong with a St George display and a Pride display and a Black History display? Isn't that politically neutral? And why wouldn't an Armed Forces display not include LGB and Black people anyway, given plenty of servicemen and women are?

I love seeing different communities in our society being made visible. I love windows into other cultures including the ones I live next door to. Isn't windows into other minds and other places exactly what libraries are supposed to be?

Edited

I agree. If there is unsuitable content eg dildos that’s a separate issue.

I think there is a laziness problem around some of the awareness days and months, where they save unimaginative librarians (or teachers or HR departments for that matter) from having to think up their own ideas. However, used well they can, as you say provide windows into other worlds.

Theeyeballsinthesky · Today 10:07

Some of those complaining about Reform’s actions had no problem with co-opting public infrastructure to do politics to others, and only now discover their objections once politics is being done to them.

exactly! Public bodies and institutions should always be politically neutral

that includes the politics we agree with as well as those we dont

and frankly if ppl running libraries hadn't been idiotic enough to have drag queens reading stories to 5 year olds and rainbow fucking dildo monkey we wouldn't bloody be here

GeneralPeter · Today 10:00

BillieWiper · Today 09:50

What's political about being gay or black ? It just sounds like They don't want to acknowledge those groups at all because they think there's something wrong with them.

Nothing inherently.

What’s political about overthrowing capitalism or abolishing prisons?

What’s political about removing sex-based rights and redefining woman in policy and law?

Quite a lot.

Some of those complaining about Reform’s actions had no problem with co-opting public infrastructure to do politics to others, and only now discover their objections once politics is being done to them.

borntobequiet · Today 09:57

What's political about being gay or black ?

Nothing. But the movements associated with “rights” in general are political campaigns, which have their place in a democratic society. What is debatable is whether the local library is the place for such campaigns. I believe it isn’t.

On a side note, my local library had an LGBT+ (didn’t clarify the “+”) display of books recently. It included a rather thin biography of Florence Nightingale. I asked the librarian why it was there and she explained, rather patronisingly, that “some people thought that FN was gay”. She didn’t like my response that that was a pretty poor reason for retrospectively queering the poor woman.

BillieWiper · Today 09:50

What's political about being gay or black ? It just sounds like They don't want to acknowledge those groups at all because they think there's something wrong with them.