Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Graham Linehan on the chapter about him in Jon Ronson's new book

511 replies

impossibletoday · 29/08/2026 21:50

Graham Linehan on Jon Ronson's new book

My ex-friend Jon Ronson may be a case study in the corrupting toxicity of trans ideology. An interesting read.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/29278d258cf0921b

My ex-friend Jon Ronson may be a case study in the corrupting toxicity of trans ideology

His book chapter about me stands as an indictment of him and the cowardly social class of people who refuse to confront uncomfortable truths

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/29278d258cf0921b

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 04/10/2026 12:35

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 11:59

On the outside chance you’re not being disingenuous about not knowing something pivotal in feminism, the 19th amendment in the US constitution gave voting rights to women (or to be more accurate, prohibited the government from prohibiting any citizen from voting on the basis of sex). It was passed in 1920.

Pivotal in feminism in the USA, we already had the vote here and New Zealand gave women the vote 1893, Australia in 1894, Canada 1916. The suggestion that it's going to be repealed is ludicrous, although if women cease to exist as a category nobody's going to bother taking the vote off them anyway.

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 12:13

So any “Poor Glinner, yes, maybe he should have checked it first, but it isn’t an endorsement, he doesn’t think that, I’m sure he doesn’t know what the 19th amendment is” is being disingenuous. He knows retweets are endorsements, so whatever is in that tweet is, by implication, his opinion. That is how X works.

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 11:59

ArabellaScott · 04/10/2026 11:49

I still don't know what the 19th amendment is.

On the outside chance you’re not being disingenuous about not knowing something pivotal in feminism, the 19th amendment in the US constitution gave voting rights to women (or to be more accurate, prohibited the government from prohibiting any citizen from voting on the basis of sex). It was passed in 1920.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 04/10/2026 11:59
Grin
ArabellaScott · 04/10/2026 11:49

I still don't know what the 19th amendment is.

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 11:48

NotBadConsidering · 04/10/2026 10:26

It’s not just condemning someone. It’s meant to condemn the entire opposition to men being women.

Glinner tweeted something questionable, ergo anyone who says TWAM is horrible, ergo TWAW.

It’s laughably sad that’s all they’ve got.

No, just Glinner for me.

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 11:44

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 04/10/2026 09:57

Thank you for providing something to comment on.
I don't see that the tweet made fun of RG's death, and all though there is mention of the repeal of the 19th Amendment, one in a long list of things mentioned in the tweet, I don't think GL retweeted it was showing support for it being repealed.
He only retweeted it, I don't see that he's added any comment to it, to show what he was supporting in the original tweet.
I'm not apologising for him, I'm not his keeper, he's a freeman he can tweet or retweet what he wants, he doesn't need mine or anyone else's permission.

What do you think retweeting is?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 04/10/2026 10:46

NotBadConsidering · 04/10/2026 10:26

It’s not just condemning someone. It’s meant to condemn the entire opposition to men being women.

Glinner tweeted something questionable, ergo anyone who says TWAM is horrible, ergo TWAW.

It’s laughably sad that’s all they’ve got.

Yep

NotBadConsidering · 04/10/2026 10:26

TheKeatingFive · 04/10/2026 10:11

I doubt Glinner knew what the 19th amendment was when he retweeted that. Yes he should have checked, but condemning someone for a retweet of a vague reference is seriously scraping the barrel.

It’s not just condemning someone. It’s meant to condemn the entire opposition to men being women.

Glinner tweeted something questionable, ergo anyone who says TWAM is horrible, ergo TWAW.

It’s laughably sad that’s all they’ve got.

TheKeatingFive · 04/10/2026 10:20

Ereshkigalangcleg · 04/10/2026 10:16

It is, and that’s why people do it, because they have fuck all else for an argument.

Exactly

Ereshkigalangcleg · 04/10/2026 10:16

TheKeatingFive · 04/10/2026 10:11

I doubt Glinner knew what the 19th amendment was when he retweeted that. Yes he should have checked, but condemning someone for a retweet of a vague reference is seriously scraping the barrel.

It is, and that’s why people do it, because they have fuck all else for an argument.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 04/10/2026 10:15

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 04/10/2026 10:03

man alive

are we still doing 'he retweeted blasphemy! all must denounce him!' ?

When are people going to figure out that twitter means fuck all? everyone, including GL would have much happier lives if they just closed their account. It's just a place for angry people who achieve jack shit to rile each other

Well quite

TheKeatingFive · 04/10/2026 10:11

I doubt Glinner knew what the 19th amendment was when he retweeted that. Yes he should have checked, but condemning someone for a retweet of a vague reference is seriously scraping the barrel.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 04/10/2026 10:03

man alive

are we still doing 'he retweeted blasphemy! all must denounce him!' ?

When are people going to figure out that twitter means fuck all? everyone, including GL would have much happier lives if they just closed their account. It's just a place for angry people who achieve jack shit to rile each other

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 04/10/2026 09:57

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 09:39

Here is the re-tweet in question. There’s nothing funny about it at all. If you find it humorous, you’re being an apologist.

Thank you for providing something to comment on.
I don't see that the tweet made fun of RG's death, and all though there is mention of the repeal of the 19th Amendment, one in a long list of things mentioned in the tweet, I don't think GL retweeted it was showing support for it being repealed.
He only retweeted it, I don't see that he's added any comment to it, to show what he was supporting in the original tweet.
I'm not apologising for him, I'm not his keeper, he's a freeman he can tweet or retweet what he wants, he doesn't need mine or anyone else's permission.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 04/10/2026 09:43

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 09:39

Here is the re-tweet in question. There’s nothing funny about it at all. If you find it humorous, you’re being an apologist.

I don’t agree with either the tweet or Glinner’s attitude to Renee Good. The 19th amendment isn’t the focus of it though, is it? Nor is it made clear what the 19th amendment is. It was an ill advised retweet. You’re reaching. It’s exactly the same as the silly “JKR named herself after a conversion therapist” trope.

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 09:39

MrPrettyDamnCosmic · 04/10/2026 08:58

And no. That 19th amendment tweet was not sarcastic in any way.

Then you sir have no sense of humour. Is it because you are not British or Irish & don't get our sense of humour?

Here is the re-tweet in question. There’s nothing funny about it at all. If you find it humorous, you’re being an apologist.

Graham Linehan on the chapter about him in Jon Ronson's new book
Shineonyoucrazy · 04/10/2026 09:33

moto748e · 29/08/2026 23:45

I'm sure he sees it well enough, @Lovelyview . He just doesn't want to risk going there.

This.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 04/10/2026 09:08

GreyskySexRealistsky · 04/10/2026 09:06

It must be crowded in there sharing with JKR. After all, there's not a lot of space

I don't know I think some people have way too much space between the ears, some spaces are so empty there's room enough to park a jumbo jet.

GreyskySexRealistsky · 04/10/2026 09:06

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 03/10/2026 14:52

Cor,’GL does live rent free in some people’s heads innit?

It must be crowded in there sharing with JKR. After all, there's not a lot of space

TheKeatingFive · 04/10/2026 09:05

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 01:56

I imagine it’s because he actually pops onto this board now and then to take part part in discussions, promote his book and trawl for donations towards his court actions? One thread is actually titled ‘Our Graham’.

And no. That 19th amendment tweet was not sarcastic in any way.

Well he’s allowed to post here. What do you think we should be doing, campaigning to get him banned? 🫠

MrPrettyDamnCosmic · 04/10/2026 08:58

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 01:56

I imagine it’s because he actually pops onto this board now and then to take part part in discussions, promote his book and trawl for donations towards his court actions? One thread is actually titled ‘Our Graham’.

And no. That 19th amendment tweet was not sarcastic in any way.

And no. That 19th amendment tweet was not sarcastic in any way.

Then you sir have no sense of humour. Is it because you are not British or Irish & don't get our sense of humour?

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 08:46

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 04/10/2026 06:11

Does he, ooh. If he does then hopefully he'll get a lot of satisfaction out of knowing not everyone's brains have fallen out. There are some people who still have a sense of humour, and anyone who pops on here to slag him off is challenged and ask to prove receipts for their outrage slanders.

I still haven't seen any proof of his 19th Amendment quip by the way.

Uh huh.

Cailin66 · 04/10/2026 06:44

JennyShaw · 01/10/2026 09:25

I have been trying to explain to you that not everything has to be biological.

I’d like to hear more of your science, it’s fascinating. In what way are bullocks biologically differently to bulls? A bullock is a castrated bull, how does this change them biologically from a bull? Do you think it makes a bullock some kind of cow?

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 04/10/2026 06:11

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 01:56

I imagine it’s because he actually pops onto this board now and then to take part part in discussions, promote his book and trawl for donations towards his court actions? One thread is actually titled ‘Our Graham’.

And no. That 19th amendment tweet was not sarcastic in any way.

Does he, ooh. If he does then hopefully he'll get a lot of satisfaction out of knowing not everyone's brains have fallen out. There are some people who still have a sense of humour, and anyone who pops on here to slag him off is challenged and ask to prove receipts for their outrage slanders.

I still haven't seen any proof of his 19th Amendment quip by the way.