Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Graham Linehan on the chapter about him in Jon Ronson's new book

511 replies

impossibletoday · 29/08/2026 21:50

Graham Linehan on Jon Ronson's new book

My ex-friend Jon Ronson may be a case study in the corrupting toxicity of trans ideology. An interesting read.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/29278d258cf0921b

My ex-friend Jon Ronson may be a case study in the corrupting toxicity of trans ideology

His book chapter about me stands as an indictment of him and the cowardly social class of people who refuse to confront uncomfortable truths

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/29278d258cf0921b

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
NotBadConsidering · 05/10/2026 03:25

Because of Renee Good, Glinner supports the abolition of this amendment - ie. the removal of the right to vote for all women in the US, not just liberal women.

So tweeting something once in jest is strong enough to infer he wants to abolish women’s right to vote?

If you say so 🙄

Mikatdo · 05/10/2026 03:14

Ereshkigalangcleg · 05/10/2026 02:38

I didn’t know what the 19th amendment was. I doubt many people in the uk do, feminist or not. Desperate stuff 😂

And if you encounter something controversial that appears to imply taking away the rights of women, it’s so easy to type ‘What is the 19th Amendment’ in a search browser and there you are.

Voting rights for women.

Because of Renee Good, Glinner supports the abolition of this amendment - ie. the removal of the right to vote for all women in the US, not just liberal women.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 05/10/2026 02:38

I didn’t know what the 19th amendment was. I doubt many people in the uk do, feminist or not. Desperate stuff 😂

Mikatdo · 05/10/2026 02:13

As I said, the 19th Amendment gave women the right to vote in the US. In terms of women’s rights, it is an important landmark - as are similar dates in other countries around the world.

That you seem to believe is it more important to defend Glinner and pretend you don’t know about the above - that is really sad.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 05/10/2026 00:03

Yes I’d say the first, second or fifth in my Family Fortunes round!

NotBadConsidering · 04/10/2026 23:50

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 11:48

No, just Glinner for me.

Okay, well done, you’ve condemned him. Do you require the rest of us to do so too?

borntobequiet · 04/10/2026 21:35

ArabellaScott · 04/10/2026 17:23

Right to bear arms is one.of them but not sure which.

It’s the second amendment, which I can remember because you have two arms. The first I remember because you have one mouth (free speech, though there are other freedoms too).

ArabellaScott · 04/10/2026 17:23

Right to bear arms is one.of them but not sure which.

ArabellaScott · 04/10/2026 17:23

MrPrettyDamnCosmic · 04/10/2026 17:18

The 5th amendment to the US constitution is the only other likely to be known by a Brit. At least the part about not being forced to answer questions that could incriminate you in a criminal case i.e. that is the right to remain silent commonly known as "taking the Fifth"

Wait, is the 1st something to do with freedom of speech?

MrPrettyDamnCosmic · 04/10/2026 17:18

Ereshkigalangcleg · 04/10/2026 16:59

Indeed. I know a reasonable amount of feminist history, but the US constitution is not one of my areas. I had no idea what the 19th amendment was, and I bet if you cast a vox pop in the uk, it wouldn’t be a winning answer on Family Fortunes if asked about US constitutional amendments. Pointless, maybe.

The 5th amendment to the US constitution is the only other likely to be known by a Brit. At least the part about not being forced to answer questions that could incriminate you in a criminal case i.e. that is the right to remain silent commonly known as "taking the Fifth"

Ereshkigalangcleg · 04/10/2026 17:00

TheKeatingFive · 04/10/2026 13:40

It’s a reaction to a post on social media. Very easy to do impulsively / not paying full attention. It’s not a declaration of belief signed in blood 🫠

Indeed.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 04/10/2026 16:59

TheKeatingFive · 04/10/2026 13:38

I’m not American. I’m Irish, like Glinner. I hadn't a clue.

I imagine that’s not unusual.

HTH

Indeed. I know a reasonable amount of feminist history, but the US constitution is not one of my areas. I had no idea what the 19th amendment was, and I bet if you cast a vox pop in the uk, it wouldn’t be a winning answer on Family Fortunes if asked about US constitutional amendments. Pointless, maybe.

Theeyeballsinthesky · 04/10/2026 15:24

Cailin66 · 04/10/2026 14:52

gave voting rights to women (or to be more accurate, prohibited the government from prohibiting any citizen from voting on the basis of sex).

Interesting, what sex is a trans woman?

I suspect that should America go full fascist and remove the right of women to vote for example or to have bank accounts or to hold jobs, that the number of men identifying as women would plummet like a fucking stone

Cailin66 · 04/10/2026 14:52

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 11:59

On the outside chance you’re not being disingenuous about not knowing something pivotal in feminism, the 19th amendment in the US constitution gave voting rights to women (or to be more accurate, prohibited the government from prohibiting any citizen from voting on the basis of sex). It was passed in 1920.

gave voting rights to women (or to be more accurate, prohibited the government from prohibiting any citizen from voting on the basis of sex).

Interesting, what sex is a trans woman?

ArabellaScott · 04/10/2026 14:10

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 13:26

No, not American, just a woman aware of feminist history. I don’t tend to keep to my own country when reading about women’s rights as a whole. It doesn’t make sense to do so.

I would hazard a guess most women - most people - in the UK have no fucken clue what any particular US amendment relates to.

I have only a piecemeal knowledge of feminist history, but great to have someone with global knowledge here.

What other parts of feminism are you interested in?

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 04/10/2026 14:06

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 13:26

No, not American, just a woman aware of feminist history. I don’t tend to keep to my own country when reading about women’s rights as a whole. It doesn’t make sense to do so.

Just someone else obsessed with the USA, from whence all this batshitery comes from.

nutmeg7 · 04/10/2026 13:55

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 11:59

On the outside chance you’re not being disingenuous about not knowing something pivotal in feminism, the 19th amendment in the US constitution gave voting rights to women (or to be more accurate, prohibited the government from prohibiting any citizen from voting on the basis of sex). It was passed in 1920.

Any reason most women in the UK should be aware of details of US history? I didn’t know what it was either. It’s not something that’s on our school curriculum.

MrPrettyDamnCosmic · 04/10/2026 13:50

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 09:39

Here is the re-tweet in question. There’s nothing funny about it at all. If you find it humorous, you’re being an apologist.

Obviously you have had a sense of humour bypass & cannot recognise satire. It’s not meant to be taken literally just like Jonathan Swift wasn’t really suggesting that starving Irish parents should eat their children.

MyAmpleSheep · 04/10/2026 13:41

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 09:39

Here is the re-tweet in question. There’s nothing funny about it at all. If you find it humorous, you’re being an apologist.

Apologist… this word, I do not think it means what you think it means.

TheKeatingFive · 04/10/2026 13:40

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 12:13

So any “Poor Glinner, yes, maybe he should have checked it first, but it isn’t an endorsement, he doesn’t think that, I’m sure he doesn’t know what the 19th amendment is” is being disingenuous. He knows retweets are endorsements, so whatever is in that tweet is, by implication, his opinion. That is how X works.

It’s a reaction to a post on social media. Very easy to do impulsively / not paying full attention. It’s not a declaration of belief signed in blood 🫠

TheKeatingFive · 04/10/2026 13:38

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 11:59

On the outside chance you’re not being disingenuous about not knowing something pivotal in feminism, the 19th amendment in the US constitution gave voting rights to women (or to be more accurate, prohibited the government from prohibiting any citizen from voting on the basis of sex). It was passed in 1920.

I’m not American. I’m Irish, like Glinner. I hadn't a clue.

I imagine that’s not unusual.

HTH

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 13:30

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 04/10/2026 12:35

Pivotal in feminism in the USA, we already had the vote here and New Zealand gave women the vote 1893, Australia in 1894, Canada 1916. The suggestion that it's going to be repealed is ludicrous, although if women cease to exist as a category nobody's going to bother taking the vote off them anyway.

I would have agreed with you 10 years ago about the repealing, but not so much now, although it does seem remote. Women ceasing to exist as a category is even more remote than that.

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 13:26

ArabellaScott · 04/10/2026 12:58

So your'e American Mikatdo? How's the feminism going over there?

No, not American, just a woman aware of feminist history. I don’t tend to keep to my own country when reading about women’s rights as a whole. It doesn’t make sense to do so.

ArabellaScott · 04/10/2026 12:58

So your'e American Mikatdo? How's the feminism going over there?

ArabellaScott · 04/10/2026 12:55

Mikatdo · 04/10/2026 11:59

On the outside chance you’re not being disingenuous about not knowing something pivotal in feminism, the 19th amendment in the US constitution gave voting rights to women (or to be more accurate, prohibited the government from prohibiting any citizen from voting on the basis of sex). It was passed in 1920.

Pivotal in US feminism, maybe. I'm not American. But thanks.