Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Terfs in the House of Lords?

37 replies

IwantToRetire · 02/09/2023 20:37

Sensible letter from 25 members of the House of Lords on the offensive use of she to refer to a male criminal in the Telegraph.
https://twitter.com/StoatlyL/status/1697890524785504422

This tweet has the list of signatories https://twitter.com/StoatlyL/status/1697933246707753216

(I have tried to find this on the Telegraph web site but have failed, so sorry for those who find the image of the text hard to read.)

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
IwantToRetire · 11/09/2023 17:33

Interestingly, "Little Women" was a favourite, not "Little Ladies", so that bucks the trend, if there really was one rather than my memory playing tricks on me!

I think maybe this illustrates how much things can change in a generation, so what we experience growing up seemed like "this is how it is" rather than some social shift.

After all the word woman or women, as in the book title has been a positive thing.

Think of the WRVS - a much loved and missed organisation of women always on hand with cups of tea and sensible solutions to any number of crises, and even the WI.

So if the usage of the word changed some time after WWII I wonder why. Just as what happened and why did the media and everybody stop talking about someone's sex and start talking about gender.

Wouldn't it be great to think that just like the hippies faded away so will all the TRAs. But then the TRAs have so sucessfully infiltrated into places of power, not so likely they will fade away.

Imagine if the hippies had been equally sucessful and we were living in a society where politics and politicians where all products of hippy values!

OP posts:
Bosky · 11/09/2023 17:22

IwantToRetire · 11/09/2023 15:54

I think I had the impression that "woman" was another way of saying "slattern" or maybe a poor, dirty, raggedy person like a female tramp who you would feel sorry for.

I cant quite remember either, but had the impression that it was someone a bit vulgar, and a bit to overtly female (brazen) or maybe it was all about schooling us to be quiet and feminine, ie lady like.

"maybe it was all about schooling us to be quiet and feminine, ie lady like."

That definitely came across in the move to reject "lady" in favour of "woman". "Ladies" were supposedly prim, compliant, posh, etc. I don't recall any favourable stereotypes being retained, instead they were transferred to "woman", eg, brave, strong, outspoken, independent, intelligent.

Definitely a class-based construction as much as feminist.

I have been trying to remember how I gained those impressions of the meaning/sub-text of "woman", ie. "slattern" or maybe a poor, dirty, raggedy person like a female tramp who you would feel sorry for.

I think children's books and especially their illustrations might have had a place, whether "Fairy/Folk Tales" or books like the "William" series. I would have to look at them to check.

All the books we had at home were either from my father's childhood that had somehow survived or they had been bought second hand in auction lots so they tended to be "old fashioned".

Interestingly, "Little Women" was a favourite, not "Little Ladies", so that bucks the trend, if there really was one rather than my memory playing tricks on me!

IwantToRetire · 11/09/2023 15:54

I think I had the impression that "woman" was another way of saying "slattern" or maybe a poor, dirty, raggedy person like a female tramp who you would feel sorry for.

I cant quite remember either, but had the impression that it was someone a bit vulgar, and a bit to overtly female (brazen) or maybe it was all about schooling us to be quiet and feminine, ie lady like.

OP posts:
ArabeIIaScott · 11/09/2023 07:20

I think some of it can all happen fast and organically, Bosky.

If we have solid legal basis, and the media is held to accuracy.

But yes, we are seeing people who've been taught and now believe utter nonsense - that sex is malleable and arbitrary, that there are more than two sexes, etc.

That kind of mad shit will be hard to get past.

Bosky · 11/09/2023 06:18

IwantToRetire · 10/09/2023 00:52

Sorry if anyone is upset with Terf in the title.

For me it not thinking men TRAs/MRAs who think they can make words misogynistic weapons.

It a way of laughing at them and wearing them with pride. Well not pride obviously but easily.

Dont forget that prior to the formation of the Women's Liberation the word "woman" was used as a derogatory way of talking about biological females. ie "that dreadful woman". Men used girl or lady ie lady wife and ... I cant remember.

So it was a deliberate policy to form the Women's Liberation Movement as a way of reclaiming a word that was accurate and being accurate about females to men it was a inferior or negative label.

"Dont forget that prior to the formation of the Women's Liberation the word "woman" was used as a derogatory way of talking about biological females. ie "that dreadful woman". Men used girl or lady ie lady wife and ... I cant remember."

I had completely forgotten about that but now you mention it I have a vague memory of being reprimanded as a child for referring to someone as a "woman" rather than as a "lady".

Another vague memory of a discussion with some other children, where we were trying to work out what the rules were, ie. why was it "rude" or "disrespectful" to say "woman" rather than "lady"? What was the difference between a "woman" and a "lady"?

I think I had the impression that "woman" was another way of saying "slattern" or maybe a poor, dirty, raggedy person like a female tramp who you would feel sorry for. Or another impression, that maybe it was one of those rules to do with children having to say things in a certain way to be respectful to grown-ups but they could say what they liked about each other?

Then a bit older, pre-teen/early teens, I have a better memory of some older girls I was friends with being disparaging about use of "lady" as old-fashioned and patronising but that I was reluctant to give it up because it seemed cheeky to say "woman".

I must have become thoroughly reprogrammed at some point though because it has startled me a couple of times recently when I have been with a group of women and one of them, always someone much younger than me, has said something like, "So Ladies, what do we think about this?"

Is that way of talking making a come-back? Or did it never go away and its just that I wasn't hanging out with women who would use "ladies" in that context?

Those vague childhood memories of trying to make sense of "the language rules" and then the clearer memory of being schooled by older girls about what was now acceptable, it reminds me that you don't understand the cultural significance at that age. Grown-ups and older children know that the world is a certain way and you just have to learn and try to keep up.

The point when you start taking your lead from teachers and other children is when you start discounting your parents' views and ways of doing things as old-fashioned, so you disregard them.

This is what worries me so much about the current indoctrination starting at Primary and even Pre-School. It can be reversed, in the same way that I learned as a "middle years" child that it was no longer acceptable to say "lady".

Will "reprogramming" need to come from older children and teachers, from social media and "cultural media", rather than parents? From grand-parents rather than parents?

IwantToRetire · 10/09/2023 00:52

Sorry if anyone is upset with Terf in the title.

For me it not thinking men TRAs/MRAs who think they can make words misogynistic weapons.

It a way of laughing at them and wearing them with pride. Well not pride obviously but easily.

Dont forget that prior to the formation of the Women's Liberation the word "woman" was used as a derogatory way of talking about biological females. ie "that dreadful woman". Men used girl or lady ie lady wife and ... I cant remember.

So it was a deliberate policy to form the Women's Liberation Movement as a way of reclaiming a word that was accurate and being accurate about females to men it was a inferior or negative label.

OP posts:
DeeKavCoffee · 09/09/2023 23:32

Thanks. Rather confusing.

ArabeIIaScott · 09/09/2023 23:30

Once upon a time, perhaps. But it's become a slur, mostly because of the way it's been applied to women, in conjunction with threats, abuse, etc.

This has been acknowledged in court in the UK.

DeeKavCoffee · 09/09/2023 23:27

ArabeIIaScott · 09/09/2023 23:24

It is. Some people are 'reclaiming' it.

This happens quite a lot with slurs.

OK thanks for context. I thought TERF was created by gender critical people anyway, before there was even the GC term!!

ArabeIIaScott · 09/09/2023 23:24

It is. Some people are 'reclaiming' it.

This happens quite a lot with slurs.

DeeKavCoffee · 09/09/2023 22:31

I thought TERF is/was a slur?

DuesToTheDirt · 03/09/2023 21:45

CantThinkOfANameAtAll · 02/09/2023 23:03

Same here. Twenty years ago I wanted it abolished, thank goodness it's still here.

I've always been against it in principle, but for it in practice. They often have a longer-term view than the HoC, and many are experts in their field. There have been numerous occasions when they curb the excesses of elected polititians.

TeenEyeroll · 03/09/2023 21:14

This is great. And literalviolence’s comment is spot on.

Abeli · 03/09/2023 14:52

Slothtoes · 03/09/2023 07:43

Fantastic. Thank you to those signatories. This is why at this point in history we really need the Lords- having a mix of professionally-experienced lawmakers who do not have to be elected. This allows for grown up discussions when the rest of elected politics is shitting on all women purely because a handful of particular men will be Upset on Twitter if those politicians don’t entirely prostrate themselves before their wishes (which often contradict safeguarding norms so would be dangerous to others to fulfil).

Absolutely agree. Elescted second chamber would lose the freedom to say unpopular things.

FroodwithaKaren · 03/09/2023 14:42

literalviolence · 02/09/2023 23:45

The emperor is not entirely naked. He's wearing leather chaps with no pants, holding a whip and admiring his own lady penis whilst holding a copy of a book which explains why it's important to queer the curriculum and stop stigmatising people who want to have sex with children. It's so much worse than just a naked emperor. Which is why it is so good to see some actual grown ups in the room.

Yup, that covers it.

Excellent letter. 👏

LarkLane · 03/09/2023 13:39

IcakethereforeIam · 02/09/2023 20:44

Yay, especially to these signatories (who aren't tories)

Baroness Deech KC (Crossbench)
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Lab)
Baroness Thornhill (Lib Dem)

Lord Young is a trustee of the LGBA.😊

maltravers · 03/09/2023 12:23

Slothtoes · 03/09/2023 07:43

Fantastic. Thank you to those signatories. This is why at this point in history we really need the Lords- having a mix of professionally-experienced lawmakers who do not have to be elected. This allows for grown up discussions when the rest of elected politics is shitting on all women purely because a handful of particular men will be Upset on Twitter if those politicians don’t entirely prostrate themselves before their wishes (which often contradict safeguarding norms so would be dangerous to others to fulfil).

I entirely agree. Keep it up HoL!

angstridden2 · 03/09/2023 08:48

Well done those peers, especially the two non Tory ones. They’re quite brave considering the stance their parties are taking.

Grammarnut · 03/09/2023 08:41

FrancescaContini · 02/09/2023 20:58

I’m past caring which political party anyone who points out the bleedin’ obvious - that the Emperor is actually naked - belongs to. Well done to all these members of the HoL.

This.

Slothtoes · 03/09/2023 07:43

Fantastic. Thank you to those signatories. This is why at this point in history we really need the Lords- having a mix of professionally-experienced lawmakers who do not have to be elected. This allows for grown up discussions when the rest of elected politics is shitting on all women purely because a handful of particular men will be Upset on Twitter if those politicians don’t entirely prostrate themselves before their wishes (which often contradict safeguarding norms so would be dangerous to others to fulfil).

FrancescaContini · 03/09/2023 07:19

literalviolence · 02/09/2023 23:45

The emperor is not entirely naked. He's wearing leather chaps with no pants, holding a whip and admiring his own lady penis whilst holding a copy of a book which explains why it's important to queer the curriculum and stop stigmatising people who want to have sex with children. It's so much worse than just a naked emperor. Which is why it is so good to see some actual grown ups in the room.

Yes. Spot on.

SammyScrounge · 03/09/2023 00:47

IwantToRetire · 02/09/2023 20:41

Have now found it!

Pronouns in the press

SIR – In your report (<a class="break-all" href="https://archive.ph/o/Lb9k2/www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/08/30/paedophile-changes-gender-sophie-carter-court/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">August 31) on the sentencing hearing of the convicted paedophile Dominic Carter, you initially called him “she”. We note the reference to “she” was removed from a later version of this story, following hundreds of disapproving comments by your readers.

It is frankly disgraceful that it was ever allowed. The crime was committed by a man, not a woman. The use of she to refer to this man is incredibly offensive to women, and illustrates the problem of accepting that anyone can be any sex they feel they are.

Crucial debates on policy have gone unreported as newspapers and other media failed to address these issues for fear of causing offence and of incurring the wrath of activist lobby groups or even regulators.

Referring to this man, and other male criminals, as women both demeans women and gives credence to the delusion that applying pink nail varnish and a headband makes one a woman.

Your readers deserve better. Journalists must report the truth, without fear or favour.

Baroness Deech KC (Crossbench)
Lord Sandhurst KC (Con)
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Lab)
Baroness Thornhill (Lib Dem)
Baroness Fleet (Con)
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Con)
Baroness Stedman-Scott (Con)
Lord Wasserman (Con)
Baroness Meyer (Con)
Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated)
Lord Lucas (Con)
Lord Strathcarron (Con)
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Con)
Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne (Con)
Baroness Lea of Lymm (Con)
Lord Roberts of Belgravia (Con)
Baroness Bray of Coln (Con)
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con)
Baroness Noakes (Con)
Lord Moylan (Con)
Baroness Foster of Oxton (Con)
Earl of Leicester (Con)
Baroness Eaton (Con)
Baroness Hodgson of Abinger (Con)
Baroness Seccombe (Con)

Towards the end of other letters published https://archive.ph/Lb9k2

I note that all the signatories except for one LibDem and 1 Labour and one Independent are Conservatives. Well done, all signatories.

IdleAnimations · 03/09/2023 00:38

literalviolence · 02/09/2023 23:45

The emperor is not entirely naked. He's wearing leather chaps with no pants, holding a whip and admiring his own lady penis whilst holding a copy of a book which explains why it's important to queer the curriculum and stop stigmatising people who want to have sex with children. It's so much worse than just a naked emperor. Which is why it is so good to see some actual grown ups in the room.

Spot on. This is all a way to break down social boundaries and ultimately get to the kids. It’s why they hate the Mothers the most - they already try and take the emotional force out of motherhood by calling us birthing persons or egg producers. It’s all their plan and I don’t care if anyone thinks I’m mental. It’s a dangerous ideology.

literalviolence · 02/09/2023 23:45

The emperor is not entirely naked. He's wearing leather chaps with no pants, holding a whip and admiring his own lady penis whilst holding a copy of a book which explains why it's important to queer the curriculum and stop stigmatising people who want to have sex with children. It's so much worse than just a naked emperor. Which is why it is so good to see some actual grown ups in the room.

PatatiPatatras · 02/09/2023 23:15

Have we got to the next stage yet?

"Of course the emperor is naked! So what? Why can't he be naked? "

I'm trying to figure out how I hold onto sanity once we get there...