Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

WeAreFairCop/Awesometistic

56 replies

UnWilly · 20/08/2023 00:39

Not quite sure what is going on here but it would seem from WeAreFairCop that something that never happens may well be

https://twitter.com/WeAreFairCop/status/1692935221853704277?t=YQpulHZg5--BI777DnWISw&s=19

https://twitter.com/WeAreFairCop/status/1692935221853704277?s=19&t=YQpulHZg5--BI777DnWISw

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Thingybob · 20/08/2023 15:28

Or non vulnerable kids.

Why do we have to give the prefix 'vulnerable' for basic safeguarding to be a consideration?

I wrote 'vulnerable' as in the original tweet he said had been working one to one with autistic kids but yes I agree he is not the sort of person who should be working with any children or vulnerable adults.

RealityFan · 20/08/2023 14:32

Men IDing as babies, in schools, with infinitely more protection than the kids in those schools.

An activist man cosplaying at breastfeeding, supported to the hilt by the professional left.

A male teacher wearing XXX cup bra, pupils and colleagues prevented from saying anything.

Physical and verbal violence a regular occurrence when women meet.

A male suggesting to a woman (whom never met before) that they could share a cubicle.

A gay luvvie type making $millions playacting at being a woman.

Men online saying there are safe glitter surrogate familieies to join if they want to leave their parents.

Women forced to be naked in front of men with erections prior to competitive sports races.

I mean, I'm detecting a pattern here. Two actually, the second worse than the first.

The first is pure misogyny and male gaze/expectancy. Has always been, will always be.

The second is worse. Upon the whims of people who's ID have less scientific basis than astrology and homeopathy, uncivil society has facilitated such behaviour, given it the green light, fully justified it.

Both ignoring naturally selected evolved instincts for danger and disgust. To somehow socially engineer a situation that can never exist...to 100% guaranteed cream off a contingent of men who claim they're women, with none of the aggression, sexual intent, deviousness etc that has been a trait of men since Adam convinced Eve to munch on that apple.

Millions of years of sex evolution, thousands of years of social conditioning, to be jettisoned and overrided in a time period that is but a mere microsecond in the span of humanity.

It can't be done, even if the circumstances were less toxic (an alternate universe where men didn't impose themselves in women's spaces, just wanted to be addressed as women in third spaces).

SirSamVimesCityWatch · 20/08/2023 14:24

AlisonDonut · 20/08/2023 14:08

Or non vulnerable kids.

Why do we have to give the prefix 'vulnerable' for basic safeguarding to be a consideration?

No kids should have a man with an adult baby fetish in school.

Absolutely. My kids aren't "vulnerable" (beyond being, you know, children) but I'd give myself a bleach enema before I let them spend an hour in the company of that perv.

AlisonDonut · 20/08/2023 14:08

Thingybob · 20/08/2023 13:42

The Awesometistic website and Twitter/X page have been taken down.

I can't help but feel sorry for the individual highlighted in the tweet as they appear to have serious mental health problems.

Having said that, there is no way they should be anywhere near vulnerable kids.

Or non vulnerable kids.

Why do we have to give the prefix 'vulnerable' for basic safeguarding to be a consideration?

No kids should have a man with an adult baby fetish in school.

Thingybob · 20/08/2023 13:42

The Awesometistic website and Twitter/X page have been taken down.

I can't help but feel sorry for the individual highlighted in the tweet as they appear to have serious mental health problems.

Having said that, there is no way they should be anywhere near vulnerable kids.

UnWilly · 20/08/2023 12:46

Thanks for posting the screenshots, I had forgotten that you couldn't see them anymore. (Thanks X)

OP posts:
IcakethereforeIam · 20/08/2023 12:35

Too many of them seem to enjoy getting off on the job.

CantThinkOfANameAtAll · 20/08/2023 12:30

BinturongsSmellOfPopcorn · 20/08/2023 11:06

Northumbria, not Northants.

You are right. Please tell my auto correct as that was a weird correction for it to do 😯

RealityFan · 20/08/2023 12:05

Simple explanation.

Once, the police were a police FORCE.

Yes, they forcibly trashed gays, POC, the disabled. But they also did get on with arresting perps and maintaining public order.

Today, they're a police SERVICE.

Their new modus operandi is to make up to all those groups they rode roughshod over in the past, hence the rainbow colours and spiels on hate speech/crimes.

At least in the past they were prejudicial with no bias, and got on with the job.

Now they have their exalted groups, meaning women remain bottom of the totem pole...then (good luck being a DV case in the 70s)...and now (good luck complaining about being assaulted at a LWS event today).

As for getting on with the job...

Saltovinegar · 20/08/2023 11:43

Doesn't surprise me, Northumbria Police are absolutely useless.

If you ring 101 you have to listen to a 10 min spiel which is mainly about not using hurty words to the sacred caste. If you are a victim of a proper crime they don't bother attending. I have a friend who has been left more devastated about the fact the police and forensics didn't bother attending after she was burgled than the actual burglary. Misgender someone and you can expect them to haul you off to the cells.

BinturongsSmellOfPopcorn · 20/08/2023 11:06

Northumbria, not Northants.

CantThinkOfANameAtAll · 20/08/2023 10:28

Damn, that's a really good letter. Wonder if Northants police will double down like the Sussex clowns do.

SirSamVimesCityWatch · 20/08/2023 09:50

Love that letter.

Bloody terrifying, the adult baby bullshit. How on earth have we got to a point as a society where that is ok?

eleanorwish · 20/08/2023 09:48

Faircop have now written a letter. I like the bit about not starring in Minority Report!

WeAreFairCop/Awesometistic
DiabolicalFinial · 20/08/2023 09:37

ArabeIIaKarenScott · 20/08/2023 08:23

Do people not know that adult baby is a fetish? I mean, really? I'm at a bit of a loss. I cannot quite believe anyone would volunteer children to hang out with a grown man sucking a dummy and wearing a baby outfit.

Oh - I assumed that he wasn’t wearing his fetish gear/outfit at the schools, but you know what? If they think he is a suitable person to interact with children (especially 1-1), maybe he was in his wank dress up? Gross.

porridgecake · 20/08/2023 08:42

The police are completely brainwashed and captured.

CantThinkOfANameAtAll · 20/08/2023 08:30

Apparently I can only see the first post so it didn't make any sense. Thanks to pp for doing the second screenshot showing what the first one is referring to. I guess this is the new and improved twitter.

ArabeIIaKarenScott · 20/08/2023 08:23

Do people not know that adult baby is a fetish? I mean, really? I'm at a bit of a loss. I cannot quite believe anyone would volunteer children to hang out with a grown man sucking a dummy and wearing a baby outfit.

RavingStone · 20/08/2023 07:27

Oh lovely. A cohort of children already at greater risk of being sexually assaulted are being exposed to an adult man with a baby fetish.

Curious if the parents were told?

Even the least disturbing aspect - "talking about being autistic" isn't neutral. I've known children find out about aspects of their diagnosis the wrong way and become extremely upset.

AnSolas · 20/08/2023 06:59

CantThinkOfANameAtAll · 20/08/2023 00:46

I'm not on twitter but why would the police do that on sm instead of a knock on the door. They know who runs/part of that group. Its got to be fake.

Its highly unlikely to be fake because WAFC know that if the police service did not post it that the police will be able to prove it is fake.

there are mulitple examples of stupid police twitter posts insisting stuff has to be removed as its a against the law when it clearly is not.

I seen a official UK police force twitter account threatening a named person who would be easy to find just through her public postings. (The bloke had clearly forgotten he was at work standing in the sunshine full view of any passing twitter account)
The threatening tweets were swiftly removed after an second UK force's twitter account pointed out that it was a police account and that calls were being made to both sets of senior management.

Never underestimate how stupid people can act

SinnerBoy · 20/08/2023 06:24

Good grief! What on Earth have I just seen and read? In my area, too.

DiabolicalFinial · 20/08/2023 05:47

It is shit like this - obviously supported, protected and celebrated by police - that makes me seriously consider homeschooling my autistic dc.

DiabolicalFinial · 20/08/2023 05:43

@NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision
Thank you - it is really frustrating to not be able to follow the tweets as they proceed, so the screenshots are appreciated!

It was as 🤯🤮 as I feared.

NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision · 20/08/2023 05:32

DiabolicalFinial · 20/08/2023 04:21

Would also ask for screenshots as not able to see tweets…

First image is Fair Cop's reply to the police force. Second image is the screenshot Fair Cop supplied of the post the police force are complaining about.

WeAreFairCop/Awesometistic
WeAreFairCop/Awesometistic