Matt Walsh Tweet Critical of Feminism

I question the values and morals of the people who question the people who question Matt's stance

😔

If we are talking long term none of this way of thinking would be possible if the Americans hadn't thrown some tea in a harbour (and I am more than happy to show my workings on that) but that doesn't mean Samuel Adams, George Washington etc are "to blame".

Yes, I thought they probably exist but stay in the closet.

I like absolute fud

I guess without antibiotics the number of people opting for “lifesaving” elective surgeries on their genitals would reduce to zero.

Matt Walsh knows about GC women VERY well because I very strongly suspect he knows KJK's campaigning and YT channel very well, as well as this forum. Or maybe it's just his researchers...I think it's more than just his researchers though. His movie scrupulously avoids any mention of any GC woman yet uses almost all the same arguments we've been making. Far too many coincidences there.

His view of feminism is extremely outdated and lazy. He needs feminists to be what he thinks they are because it supports his view of society. If he accepted that feminists are not a monolith, are far more nuanced than he is comfortable with, and don't hate men, then it entirely undermines his world view, to which he is very, very firmly attached.

Bat signal went out to some Beverly LaHaye conference...

Matt Walsh believes 10'yr old girls should be required to carry their rapists babies to term. He doesn't give a damn about any women unless they fit narrowly prescribed conservative lifestyles.

Oh hi right wing American person.

I guess the truly passionate ones do.

Well, this thread has taken a wild turn....

So because Matt has traditional values,you shame and disregard anything he speaks on.....That shows your hatred towards woman, how heartbreaking.

If you are not for traditional values, state it and move on.
Most men want women with these values, although I have noticed certain places do not agree.The woman's career is literally more important than her husband's (partner in this instance),even if they have children.

When women choose careers overs their families you people applaud it.
Will your kids appreciate being thrown into day care w strangers?

Have you been rather selective in your knowledge of Matt Walsh?

He is absolutely a person who holds calm under pressure and gets his message across. He is standing up for some women and girls issues. Not necessarily all.

It would be some very blinkered thinking that ever put him in the same profile as feminists on even issues prioritising sex over gender. He is not ‘fighting 100% for women’. He is fighting from a position that clashes with women’s rights on issues.

Sure, he has a voice and uses it. But he is doing this from a different motivation to feminism.

@Helleofabore
No,not a chance sweet dear.
The parodies are and their supporters are blasting themselves as "look at me".

Bless your heart dear....
Have you ever heard of Matt Walsh?
He pushes for women to be 💯 respected as women. He actually advocates for women who respect themselves.
Not the ones who pretend to be ok w men masquerading as women.
Unless you are fine with being pushed out as a 3rd or 4th rate citizen.

That is a remarkable post SomeOfThesePostsAreRidiculous that I can only assume is intended as a parody….

I question the values and morals of the people who question Matt's stance.
He stands for real woman and girls rights in this world.
REAL WOMEN,not the mentally ill and disillusioned.
So y'all just keep on posting who hate yourselves,your own mothers and daughters.
Just bc you may be more loud and obnoxious, you will NEVER be the majority.

Are you ashamed of being a woman?
Dig deep on why that is.
Bc that's not normal or ok ladies!

Antibiotics?!

He's a man.
Why would he be a feminist??

I'm not sure that this would be the case. I don't think this kind of thing is always going to manifest equally in any society, or in the same way when it does.

You aren't going to get many rubber fetishists in a place where there is no rubber - for example. Some of these things seem to involve some kind of triggered sexual response, but what is culturally available and contextual will vary a lot.

I also wonder if certain things need to be in place in terms of mental scaffolding and general sexual practices. In many places, and our society within the last 200 years, privacy wasn't nearly as available, nor were the material means, or the time, to indulge weird sexual proclivities for most. People from a young age knew about and were around what was often pretty utilitarian sex. And it's consequences (babies.)

We. on the other hand, have a lot of privacy and time, and what's more are constantly exposed to pretty unrealistic images and instantiations of sex - even inclding 10 foot high pictures of underwear models at the mall.

Our society seems designed to create the maximum number of paraphilias and fetishes.

I don't think he's talking about individuals, he's talking about what made this plausible to so many people in the general population.

In fact you hear people say this all the time when you challenge it - they say we are reducing women to their genitals or reproduction. People see those things as being irrelevant in large part because they've been taught that is the right way to think, and they apply it as a kind of universal.

I think it's demonstrably true that there has been in the English speaking west a popular idea, lets say over the last 30 years but maybe becoming a thing even before that, which claims that the only difference between men and woman are the shape of the genitals and who carries the baby. And explicitly denies many of the elements of sex difference many of us would say come out of that. So, for example, people who think this way give short shrift to the idea that gestating a baby, all of the hormonal stuff associated with that, and being the partner capable of breastfeeding, might mean women will be more likely to need/want to take some kind of career break than men.

The most noticible form we find are people who believe that that sport is an equal playing field for males and female, that the only reason there aren't equal numbers of female infanteers, firefighters, or furniture movers, is because of sexism. Or that demand movie fight scenes show tiny women beating the crap out of large men.

People who take this approach tend to think the goal is to see equal numbers of men and women in all employment sectors, social groups, and so on.

I don't think it's unfair to see the development of this way of thinking as part of feminism. Clearly it's not the whole thing, but I really don't know what you'd call it if not a product in the effect of feminist thinking and lobbying on society.

And I think it has in part contributed to setting the stage for gender ideology.

I was going to say he's a douche but weapon is better.

Men will always find ways that their misogyny partly or wholly our fault. Feminists know better.

(But I'd be surprised if there wasn't some baseline amount of AGP even in Saudi Arabia. Womb envy probably exists everywhere!)