Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

To ask everyone who has heard of using pronouns to watch this?

239 replies

Moomoola · 03/07/2023 22:34

its a worthwhile introduction/ explanation of what’s going on that I’ve found. Please watch it - and post your responses. It may also be very worthwhile checking what’s going on in your child’s school - if they’re not in hols!
thank you!

Megyn Kelly Explains Why She Will No Longer Use "Preferred Pronouns" as Trans Ideology Grows

Megyn Kelly begins the show with a monologue explaining why she is done using "preferred pronouns" and will base her conversations on trans ideology in reali...

https://youtu.be/FxB0LHvS4fg

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
CrazyArmadilloLady · 04/07/2023 20:35

Helleofabore · 04/07/2023 15:38

It is remarkable isn't WillNoLie.

Must be all that watching and reading of content written by unapproved authors and creators! Because we all know that watching or reading something is signalling our complete support and our alignment.

We mustn't bother watching or reading something by unapproved authors or creators so that we can discuss it from an informed position at all!! Even if we find most of what someone says abhorrent.

We must stay in a 'safe space' where no unapproved or unauthorised content is seen.

That’s certainly what the TRAs want.

PurpleBugz · 04/07/2023 20:21

I watched it. I feel strongly that if someone tells me not to watch or read something then I should. I will use JKR as my example why we should look it up for ourselves not rely on what others say.

I think the video was a brilliant explanation of how someone can move from "be kind" to understanding. It made the point well with clear examples and no unnecessary waffle.

The video makes no reference to her other beliefs and opinions so as a stand alone I do agree it's a good starting point to explain why preferred pronouns are such a problem. As many people have already said: we can agree with some on one point and grossly disagree on most others.

I genuinely think it's a tactic used to keep women from uniting. To point out ways we are different or disagree so we then focus on that rather than the topic at hand. I would march next to a racist against gender ideology, and I would March next to a TRA against racism. The point is we speak keep speaking and peak people to what is happening

LuckyPeonies · 04/07/2023 19:44

@moomoola I would advise you to google her. Scads of info out there so you can make up your own opinion. Mind you, those who are conservative will, no doubt, not find much to disagree with. Which is their right, of course.

Thank you for pointing out that I was being inflammatory, I should not have been and I do apologize. The woman makes me see red, especially since her declaration ‘ the scotus nailed it’ when they overturned abortion rights, and ‘abortion rights should not be part of the feminist platform’.

AnElegantChaos · 04/07/2023 19:39

Prove that Megyn Kelly is a racist.

Simple google search will help you out here, many times over!

Moomoola · 04/07/2023 19:32

Hi lucky you obviously know your stuff and thank you for pointing out that Megyn is all of the above - I only thought she was a bit glam tv show host - obv I need to do more research - though I still think she explains things well - and suitably sentimentally (it’s tv after all).
Please could you post any links you’ve found to stuff that could help explain in a less inflammatory way?
im not being funny, I genuinely need help to explain rationally to a mum who wants to medicalise my child.
thank you!

OP posts:
LuckyPeonies · 04/07/2023 19:10

toomanytrees · 04/07/2023 18:21

Meghan kelly is vile and odious.

I wouldn't know, as I don't spend my time watching bible thumpers, racists, people who minimised insurrections, conspiracy theorists, not know who Alex Jones is (didn't she host the One Show?) Etc etc etc.

These spittle inflected insults are way off the mark. They are an emotive incantation to warn people off. Do leftists not have any proper arguments? Are they afraid that people will discover that the right wing have some good ideas?

Prove that Megyn Kelly is a racist. Why use the insulting term "bible thumper"? The seriousness of capitol "insurrection" is a legitimate topic for discussion. "Conspiracy theories" have become probabilities or facts, for example, the lab leak hypothesis.

She is really going full throttle on this issue. Judging by this thread, the gender ideologues are very afraid of her.

Incantations ? Perhaps I need to be burned at the stake as a witch? 🙄 I am not keeping anyone, nor trying to keep anyone, from watching this video. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. And my opinion of kelly (and her ilk) is exactly what I posted.

Furthermore, I am not a gender ideologue by any definition. I don’t use they/them and I do not believe one can change one’s biological sex. I also do not believe men should compete in women’s sports.

However, I personally find kelly (and her ilk) vile and odious for their general hate-mongering, and gleeful attempts to add fuel to the current inflammatory political climate in the US. There is no legitimacy to the 6 jan insurrection-minimizing kelly and other right wing extremist push, and it is dangerous to try to minimize such an event. As for her bigotry/racism, google it.

Lastly, I will happily retract ‘bible thumper’ and replace it with ‘an aggressively zealous advocate of christian fundamentalism’, if that suits.

toomanytrees · 04/07/2023 18:21

Meghan kelly is vile and odious.

I wouldn't know, as I don't spend my time watching bible thumpers, racists, people who minimised insurrections, conspiracy theorists, not know who Alex Jones is (didn't she host the One Show?) Etc etc etc.

These spittle inflected insults are way off the mark. They are an emotive incantation to warn people off. Do leftists not have any proper arguments? Are they afraid that people will discover that the right wing have some good ideas?

Prove that Megyn Kelly is a racist. Why use the insulting term "bible thumper"? The seriousness of capitol "insurrection" is a legitimate topic for discussion. "Conspiracy theories" have become probabilities or facts, for example, the lab leak hypothesis.

She is really going full throttle on this issue. Judging by this thread, the gender ideologues are very afraid of her.

LuckyPeonies · 04/07/2023 17:19

AlisonDonut · 04/07/2023 08:09

I wouldn't know, as I don't spend my time watching bible thumpers, racists, people who minimised insurrections, conspiracy theorists, not know who Alex Jones is (didn't she host the One Show?) Etc etc etc.

However she is still a woman right? And is entitled to have opinions whether you like her or not.

I keep informed, therefore I am aware of her and her ilk and their hate mongering.

You asked why I hold this opinion, and I was courteous enough to specify, instead of telling you to google it (which was my first inclination).

And nowhere did I imply she is not entitled to her opinion(s). I merely posted she is vile and odious, and I refuse to listen to her. Which is my opinion.

LonginesPrime · 04/07/2023 15:44

Jibo · 03/07/2023 22:58

I like this explanation too.

I find the stroop test thing especially is really helpful.

teawamutu · 04/07/2023 15:39

Hidinginaonesie · 04/07/2023 08:10

Bloody hell, can pps please stop requesting the thread be moved/removed/not watched!!
I’ve watched the clip and I 100% agree with her on this subject. I’ve also watched other opinions of hers that I don’t agree with at all.
It is possible. And not really that complicated.
I have my own opinions. I’ll watch whatever I want to watch in the knowledge that I’m perfectly capable of making up my own mind as to whether I agree or not.

Exactly this. I'll decide what I want to bloody watch, thank you, and if someone speaks sense on one thing, and rubbish otherwise, then I'll factor that in.

So sick of 'this person is A Baddy so everything they say is norty and wrong '. It's puerile.

Helleofabore · 04/07/2023 15:38

It is remarkable isn't WillNoLie.

Must be all that watching and reading of content written by unapproved authors and creators! Because we all know that watching or reading something is signalling our complete support and our alignment.

We mustn't bother watching or reading something by unapproved authors or creators so that we can discuss it from an informed position at all!! Even if we find most of what someone says abhorrent.

We must stay in a 'safe space' where no unapproved or unauthorised content is seen.

TheSingingBean · 04/07/2023 15:34

I had never heard of MK prior to seeing this video. I’m also left wing politically, but I think she nailed it. I wish I could argue my case as fluently, to be honest.

She may well have other views that I find repellent; it doesn’t mean I can’t agree with her on this.

IWillNoLie · 04/07/2023 15:11

The only thing you are correct about is that now the American conservative right has got onto it something might actually be done because they are the ones that actually hold power in the world, thanks to faux-naive people like you campaigning for them.

The power of MN strikes again.

Helleofabore · 04/07/2023 14:57

"Operating, drugs and irreversible damage, well they will have a lot to deal,with, mentally if nothing else. Side effects? , probably in 7-10 years - a friends daughter 7 years on now has walking aides and joint pain at 27."

Since you mention this OP, I hope that you don't mind if I post the link to this thread which has a link to detransitioner panel that some posters may not have seen and may be interested in.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4841422-detransitioners-talking?reply=127370751

Detransitioners talking | Mumsnet

This is worth a watch.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4841422-detransitioners-talking?reply=127370751

Hepwo · 04/07/2023 14:52

Well that's made me laugh. Dishes it out but can't take it.

Backstreets · 04/07/2023 14:48

I thought you were brave to post this outside FWR op :) and I think a lot of posters would think very differently if they’d been through what you have. I’m really sorry.

Moomoola · 04/07/2023 14:24

P.s.thanks hepwo

OP posts:
Moomoola · 04/07/2023 14:22

Well, while we are all arguing about right and left, the simple thing is that I wanted to post this on normal AIBU. Not to create an exciting argument becathats pointless, and no one wins. But to draw attention to what’s happening to teens at the moment.
I have heard several teens and school leavers say that their school turned into a bullying culture - if you have the opinion that you can wear what you like, but there are two biological sexes.

All this energy and discussion and emotion is very clever. Whether you believe in genders replacing biological sex or not, while we are getting lost in emotion, our confused teens are being fed into a vast medical experiment. There has been some discussion amongst surgeons that they are learning - there’s never been such an upsurge in this type of cosmetic surgery or steroid uptake in young teens before.
Its also worth remembering that each person who medically transitions has to keep buying a drug for life, and have multiple surgeries. Oh and apparently makes about 1.3 million dollars profit for the big pharmaceutical companies.

there are 48.5 000 people on the Detrans subreddit. A quick random scroll of the posts will break your heart.
And again I say, please don’t let this happen to your teen - having multiple genders, well why not. Operating, drugs and irreversible damage, well they will have a lot to deal,with, mentally if nothing else. Side effects? , probably in 7-10 years - a friends daughter 7 years on now has walking aides and joint pain at 27.
Just saying.

OP posts:
Hepwo · 04/07/2023 14:11

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Helleofabore · 04/07/2023 14:07

open = opinion

Helleofabore · 04/07/2023 14:04

cocoloco117 · 04/07/2023 13:30

Should have left it there, doesn't belong in FSG either. What's feminist about it? Used to be some sensible discussions on here until the right wing woke obsessed meme brigade turned up.

Because it is a discussion about a woman and her opinion on using correct sex pronouns. A discussion that often happens on this board.

Helleofabore · 04/07/2023 14:03

cocoloco117 · 04/07/2023 13:25

Logic? This is a feminist board and you're wondering why there's pushback on some anti-feminist right winger whose deeply conservative views happen to coincide with the GC view on one issue? She only has her platform in the first place because her content serves and promotes the patriarchal power structures that suppress women. If this is video is lightbulb moment for you then good for you (must be pretty dark in your head) but some of us already figured out pronouns by ourselves and don't need to be patronised. Sadly this board used to have really good GC feminist discussion and information but is now inundated by this type of low quality GC adjacent rightwing shitposting.

And more hyperbole.

If people cannot seriously listen or read something that they oppose for some kind of fear of 'aligning' with that content, they have some serious deficits in their thinking.

You can keep on trying to push your narrow beliefs and your own prejudiced leaps that you have made about me. You can keep on slinging insults, it seriously doesn't matter. Attempting to police people's media consumption to be restricted to only an 'approved' content provider is authoritarian by nature.

If YOU don't want to watch it and comment on it, that is fine. Don't watch it or comment on it. You are an adult and you can scroll on past. My objection is that you and others have attempted to shame others who watch it. For whatever reason they are watching it, you have assumed the worst and made baseless and far fetched accusations.

You also seem to have assumed what my open on this person is based on the fact that I am here telling you that shaming women for watching this video is wrong. You seem to call yourself a feminist yet you are also very determined to control what other women do.

It seems that you have made some pretty prejudicial judgements about any person who watches it without once seeking to understand the motivation for watching it. You have made blanket statements that show little logic. What it does show is your own deep prejudices.

How very feminist to control the media that people watch because you cannot conceive any other reason for someone watching it other than your own preconceived notion that they do it because they are 'supporting' or 'aligning' with them!

cocoloco117 · 04/07/2023 13:30

AlisonDonut · 04/07/2023 12:23

Wasn't this one posted in another board but as usual, it gets hived off into 'feminism sex and gender' to keep the general public clean of wrong think.

Should have left it there, doesn't belong in FSG either. What's feminist about it? Used to be some sensible discussions on here until the right wing woke obsessed meme brigade turned up.

inamarina · 04/07/2023 13:28

GrinAndVomit · 04/07/2023 07:01

Amala Ekpunobi would be worth watching on YouTube.
She’s really smart. She’s really balanced. She’s really likeable.

I second this 🙂

cocoloco117 · 04/07/2023 13:25

Helleofabore · 04/07/2023 12:12

Buying what? Logic? Rational thought? Yes, it didn't look like you invested in those at all by reading your posts.

You have written a great deal of hyperbole here and actually accused me of being 'faux-naive' and campaigning for someone. I mean, maybe you really do need to roll out a hyperbole alert on your posts. That is some far reach... but hey, coming from someone who declared a post analysing Trump as 'bigging' him up.

"The fact that the change they want happens to coincide with the GC feminist viewpoint on this occasion doesn't excuse the fact that the same people are pushing anti-women agendas elsewhere."

Oh really? No way? Seriously?... you do seem to think we are stupid, don't you?

What part of listening to someone's video means that we support them? What part of listening to someone's video and agreeing with one thing and disagreeing with other things means that we are pushing their agendas? particularly since we have not actually had any rational discussion at all about this video on this thread.

You do realise that listening to someone's words doesn't make you some kind of follower, or convert, or political agent for them? Are you so insecure in your own thinking that you cannot listen to others?

Logic? This is a feminist board and you're wondering why there's pushback on some anti-feminist right winger whose deeply conservative views happen to coincide with the GC view on one issue? She only has her platform in the first place because her content serves and promotes the patriarchal power structures that suppress women. If this is video is lightbulb moment for you then good for you (must be pretty dark in your head) but some of us already figured out pronouns by ourselves and don't need to be patronised. Sadly this board used to have really good GC feminist discussion and information but is now inundated by this type of low quality GC adjacent rightwing shitposting.

Swipe left for the next trending thread