Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Sharron Davies on Woman's Hour today (Wednesday)

89 replies

nauticant · 28/06/2023 10:03

She'll be discussing fareness in sport. Since this is the first time a post-Emma Barnett presenter (Nuala McGovern) will be looking at gender identity ideology, this could be interesting.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001n8q3

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Doggydarling · 30/06/2023 01:20

She was also interviewed on Newstalk (Ireland) today.
Check out this podcast Sharron Davies: Separate categories needed for trans athletes by The Hard Shoulder Highlights on GoLoud app https://link.goloudplayer.com/s/pGtoL7iS7nLC

Sharron Davies: Separate categories needed for trans athletes

Anton Savage was joined on The Hard Shoulder by former British Olympic swimmer Sharron Davies to discuss her new book 'Unfair Play'.

https://link.goloudplayer.com/s/pGtoL7iS7nLC

TheBiologyStupid · 30/06/2023 00:54

Just caught up. Sharron was excellent - as always. Great that she got the time to put her knowledge and experience out there. I do miss Emma Barnett though...

hannahwaddinghamsbiceps · 29/06/2023 12:44

I have listened to this. What an eloquent, measured and well researched speaker Sharron is. Absolutely fantastic. The evidence that was used to back up every point was helpful in keeping everything non-emotional and leaving no doubt about the truth.

CurseYouPerryThePlatypus · 29/06/2023 10:30

MagpiePi · 29/06/2023 10:17

It's because those drugs will have been tested on men.
I thought that this was because, ironically, women's hormones make them react unpredictably, and so they can't get consistent results.

I didn’t realise that.

You’d think it’d be a reason for more careful monitoring really.

MagpiePi · 29/06/2023 10:17

CurseYouPerryThePlatypus · 29/06/2023 09:34

Off topic but speaking of menstrual cycles, I work closely with some NHS mental health workers and we have been discussing lately just how little female hormones are taken into account. Eg some antipsychotics favoured in psych wards (used to sedate, not just for teens who actually have psychosis) mess with hormone levels, risking the mental health of girls who are already affected by natural fluctuations. But it’s just female hormones so who cares, eh?

It's because those drugs will have been tested on men.
I thought that this was because, ironically, women's hormones make them react unpredictably, and so they can't get consistent results.

MavisMcMinty · 29/06/2023 10:10

Sorry, that was to @CurseYouPerryThePlatypus .

MavisMcMinty · 29/06/2023 10:09

I had two mares and by God, were they hormonal! Competitions were a nightmare if it coincided with their sexy-time - and horses’ “seasons” are every three weeks during spring and summer. Mares are often unpopular as competition horses because of this unpredictability/unreliability.

OhComeOnFFS · 29/06/2023 10:08

I listened to this and the night before I watched Kathleen Stock at the Oxford Union on YouTube.

Nuala: something along the lines of... we haven't been able to bring anyone in to give the opposing point of view

Oxford Union: Kathleen Stock struggles to hear what students are asking because of the racket outside from TWAW supporters who didn't want her to say what she thought.

Have you ever heard a TWAW supporter apologise for not showing the opposite POV?

Tratjymp · 29/06/2023 09:59

It was a good show from Sharron and the host was fairly reasonable.

Someone new to all this could listen to it for some time before realising they were talking about the simple matter of men pretending to be women, or even men just stating that they are women without doing any pretending. And people are letting these goons into women's sports events!

CurseYouPerryThePlatypus · 29/06/2023 09:34

Off topic but speaking of menstrual cycles, I work closely with some NHS mental health workers and we have been discussing lately just how little female hormones are taken into account. Eg some antipsychotics favoured in psych wards (used to sedate, not just for teens who actually have psychosis) mess with hormone levels, risking the mental health of girls who are already affected by natural fluctuations. But it’s just female hormones so who cares, eh?

CurseYouPerryThePlatypus · 29/06/2023 09:29

The latest in sports medicine is to train female athletes in tune with menstrual cycles. I believe it's how some women's football teams have done so well lately.

That’s really interesting!

CurseYouPerryThePlatypus · 29/06/2023 09:27

I haven’t watched this, thank you for sharing. I did watch the Sex Matters webinar with Sharron on last night though, it was brilliant. I really admire her bravery and determination.

I must admit I usually avoid buying newly released books because money, I usually have to wait for eBay/charity shops, but I’m not waiting for her book. I am really glad she’s written it.

WarriorN · 29/06/2023 07:58

ZeldaFighter · 28/06/2023 18:51

And just to continue ranting, what about tracking monthly performance fluctuations due to the menstrual cycle and comparing it to a transwoman's monthly performance? I wonder if that would highlight anything insightful.

What about considering years of training required? Most transwoman seem to start a sport and dominate immediately - maybe you could compare the years of sporting participation before medalling?

And if you're still reading, I am aware of the great work by Dr Emma Hilton and Ross Tucker - why is their work not accepted as settled science?

The latest in sports medicine is to train female athletes in tune with menstrual cycles. I believe it's how some women's football teams have done so well lately.

Women's metabolisms are very different to male metabolisms. In some contexts the complete opposite.

Of course they've only recently begun to collect data purely on women.

MinervaBoudicca · 28/06/2023 22:23

Brilliant brilliant Sharron.
What a warrior she is!
Make her a DAME
oh and the IOC should rectify the records to show she won 🏅

MavisMcMinty · 28/06/2023 21:33

I’m also glad Sharron didn’t mention/reply to Emily Bridges’ cries of genocide, although I’d’ve been sorely tempted, personally.

LyndaSnellsSniff · 28/06/2023 20:56

Sharron was phenomenal. I'd never applauded a radio programme before today. Brilliant.

MavisMcMinty · 28/06/2023 19:07

It was a great interview, Sharron was very impressive and knowledgable. Glad I listened to the first segment too, on the gropey Tory mayoral hopeful. Sharron had also listened, and was able to link what she was saying to what Isabel Hardman had said.

BettyFilous · 28/06/2023 19:05

Who knew that the 'winners' in women's sports were actually just picked at random from the whole population?!

I’m keeping everything crossed I don’t get called up for the Paris 2024 Olympics. 🤞🤞🤞 I don’t want to have to lay off cake and beer to get in shape.

ZeldaFighter · 28/06/2023 18:51

And just to continue ranting, what about tracking monthly performance fluctuations due to the menstrual cycle and comparing it to a transwoman's monthly performance? I wonder if that would highlight anything insightful.

What about considering years of training required? Most transwoman seem to start a sport and dominate immediately - maybe you could compare the years of sporting participation before medalling?

And if you're still reading, I am aware of the great work by Dr Emma Hilton and Ross Tucker - why is their work not accepted as settled science?

SabrinaThwaite · 28/06/2023 18:48

Yes - Nuala quoting Bridges’ hyperbole about the BC policy gave Sharron the opportunity to point out that it’s just emotional manipulation.

ZeldaFighter · 28/06/2023 18:47

PriOn1 · 28/06/2023 16:12

Another wrong “fact”:

”only one trans woman has competed in the Olympics, Laurel Hubbard of New Zealand, who participated in 2020 in Japan … she came last.”

These pathetic “reporters” really need to do their homework. Another relatively ancient Olympian, who had only been doing the sport for four years.

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/530285-barrett-transgender-archer-olympics/

All the eyerolls! 🙄

All this "the science is uncertain" bollocks really ticks me off!!!

Why is it uncertain? Because no one has bothered to research it properly. Why has no one bothered to research it properly? 1. Because no one cares about women's sports and 2. It would prove unequivocally that transgender women have an unfair advantage and no one wants to take on the transgender lobby because no 1.

The whole argument is ridiculous. What is the average height of elite biological women cyclists, runners and swimmers? What is the average height of transwomen cyclists, runners and swimmers? What about other physical measurements?

What about results and statistics from pre and post-transition for transwomen athletes? It's the 21st century and people first performed "sex changes" in the 1960s. The data exists! It's there! Just look at it! We know how fast Will Thomas swam and we know how fast Lia Thomas swam - compare them and then compare it to their peers. Why is this hard??? I could do it tomorrow but I'm busy!

HPFA · 28/06/2023 16:43

Don't know why anyone is criticising Nuala.

She let Sharron speak, put the opposing view in a neutral and professional way and handled herself well.

I don't think we always recognise how much things are moving on - both the fact of the interview happening and the way it was conducted would have been unlikely only a year ago.

PriOn1 · 28/06/2023 16:12

MagpiePi · 28/06/2023 12:01

Here is just one of those wrong facts:

In 2022 the Office of National Statistics (ONS) published statistics showing just 0.5% of the population of England and Wales identified as a different gender than their sex assigned at birth. Breaking the stats down further and excluding those who are non-binary, just 48,000 were trans women, and the exact same figure were trans men. In comparison, the ONS report there are 30,420,100 natal females. Simple maths tells us that natal females outnumber trans women by the ratio of six hundred and thirty-three to one.

Basic maths proves trans women will never dominate women’s sports events.

Who knew that the 'winners' in women's sports were actually just picked at random from the whole population?!

Another wrong “fact”:

”only one trans woman has competed in the Olympics, Laurel Hubbard of New Zealand, who participated in 2020 in Japan … she came last.”

These pathetic “reporters” really need to do their homework. Another relatively ancient Olympian, who had only been doing the sport for four years.

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/530285-barrett-transgender-archer-olympics/

All the eyerolls! 🙄

The Olympics’ shambolic gender rules are allowing biological men to displace women from the top of their sports – it has to stop

Canadian archer Stephanie Barrett is making her Olympic debut aged 42 having only taken up the sport four years ago, but all the fawning articles charting her meteoric rise fail to mention that Barrett was born male. 

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/530285-barrett-transgender-archer-olympics/

SinnerBoy · 28/06/2023 15:45

NotHavingIt · Today 12:09

I see one of the wins was against a natal male who has boxed 8 matches professionally and won none of them. I guess promoters will only pitch Patricio against no-hope males?

They could well have been journeymen, who make a good living by not beating opponents. They're mostly reasonably skilled, but not championship material.

They learn to get beaten, without taking heavy punishment.

Needapadlockonmyfridge · 28/06/2023 15:33

I caught most of it. Sharon was fantastic. Clear, eloquent, reasoned. Thank you Sharron. I have daughters and worry a lot about how things will be for them in the future. I hope they appreciate what people like Sharron are trying to do here