Yes.
For me the bigger picture is that one of the things that has really made it difficult for women to be heard on this issue, or any critics of gender ideology, is the tendency to demonize people who have a different viewpoint as bigoted or stupid, and to rely on tribal affinities rather than looking at issues.
All of that has been as effective as the direct "No Debate" stuff, probably more effective. It's allowed completely idiotic mantras to be widely accepted omong the progressive left, because no one wants to look like a baddie. This atmosphere has been around long enough that it's affected the ability of many people to engage critically at all with subjects where there is supposedly a "right" side. Stupid shit like "Love is Love" get a pass because they are used to just accepting what seems nice and supportive of the cause - looking at the deeper implications is no longer a thing.
The only way to get out of that mess is to stop those kinds of behaviours, that approach to thinking. Get rid of those lazy intellectual habits.
There are a few people who are critics of gender ideology who previously seem to have been part of that way of thinking. JKR was one to some extent, Glinner another. I think for many people, the experience of seeing what happened has actually shocked them out of that way of thinking and talking, into a more serious engagement with ideas in general. That seems to me to be the case with JKR. Glinner, maybe somewhat, but he still seems more inclined to continue to focus on the player rather than the ball.
To me that's a big mistake because it ultimately supports the environment that allowed this shitfest to happen.