Data on violence against trans people & women

That was to your ‘statistics’ page
https://kareningalasmith.com/2021/04/21/counting-dead-trans-people/

Nope. Asians are 2x likely compared to white people to be victims of homicide.

Homicide isn't the only "crime against the person" is it? As we see, given there is no trans murder epidemic according to any data we have, but you apparently have data that states (however reliably) that trans people are more at risk of violence?

From gov.uk

The Asian ethnic group (2%) were significantly less likely than the White ethnic group (4%) to be victims of a personal crime

Speaking of muddying, it’s clear that only applies to
Intimidating a witness or juror, contrary to section 51 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994*

So, not ‘hurty tweets’ regarding gender ideology and also not a hate crime.

Focus, Hen, focus! Stop swerving!

Nope. Asians are 2x likely compared to white people to be victims of homicide.

When you start fabricating statistics to fit your narrative- is that being in good faith? Is that the type of evidence you are used to trotting out?

https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/ethnic-minorities-at-much-higher-risk-of-homicide-in-england-and-wales

This is borne out by both police data and data from friends and family members of murdered people.

You really don't allow facts to muddy your arguments, do you?

From the CPS

Electronic communications sent via social media may involve the commission of a range of offences, including: offences against the person, public justice, sexual or public order offences, and Harassment, Stalking, and Controlling & Coercive Behaviour.

Distribution of offences flagged as hate crimes

51% 'public order'

How convenient to accept shit data that is know to not record what you’d actually need to come to an evidence based conclusion.

Goodness, best mention to the Trans Day of Remembrance compilers that their data is "shit".

The evidence based conclusion is that there is no trans murder epidemic.

That’s different from the Public Order Act and therefore offences are not Public Order offences.

41% isn’t a small number, it’s second largest type of hate crime
Do you not know the meaning of 'predominantly'?

Hate crimes exist because those demographics have been shown to have a higher rate of being victims of violent crime than the average person. A demographic is not eligible to be covered under hate crime legislation unless this is the case.

Nope. Hate crimes are those considered to be particularly socially divisive.

Asian people are half as likely to be the victims of a crime against the person against white people, but much more likely to have the crime logged as a hate crime, as clearly it is much more likely to be racially motivated.

Apparently you didn’t read it. The only reference to SM is to tell prosecutors to look at Communications Offences- which are different acts from the Public Order Act.

You do know that SM isn’t “in public” and public order offences do not apply to SM (tweets)?

If you bothered to read my posts you would see that I know what a public order offence is. SM can be covered by harassment and "causing public fear, alarm or distress".

Here.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/27/section/1

and

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/social-media-and-other-electronic-communications

You might "know how to look it up", but you didn't, did you? Which makes me wonder if you've ever actually seen these figures in the raw before.

Mate, don't be so daft. Read the link I posted.

You do know that SM isn’t “in public” and public order offences do not apply to SM (tweets)?

Most 'violence against the person' is 'violence against the person without injury', thankfully.

This bar chart shows the proportion of different offences quite clearly.

At least this pigeon knows how to look up the definition of a hate crime and knows the meaning of one. If I’m a pigeon playing chess, then you must be a potted plant.

Distribution of offences flagged as hate crimes

51% 'public order'

How astonishing. This is my surprised face.

“Hate crimes are predominantly not violence against the person.”
41% isn’t a small number, it’s second largest type of hate crime

“Hate crimes are not comparing crime rates with violence suffered by the average person”
Hate crimes exist because those demographics have been shown to have a higher rate of being victims of violent crime than the average person. A demographic is not eligible to be covered under hate crime legislation unless this is the case.

Distribution of offences flagged as hate crimes

51% 'public order'

happy Sunday

Catch up, @PonyPatter44 has already done that.

Criminal damage: graffiti, stickering.

The report mentions "anti Muslim graffiti" specifically.

Do you think we came down in the last shower, Crackhen? It's a new twist on pigeon chess, anyway.