What is a woman: Daily Wire documentary on for limited time for free

Yup. I was thinking this.

I hate that it's not till men speak up that people listen

161.2 million views so far.

It's still up on Twitter & free to watch.

Matt Walsh has also received multiple credible death threats, had to engage armed security at home to protect his family (as well as himself when out & about) plus had a concerted attack recently get his channel demonetised on YouTube.

He doesn't go after the incomes of TRAs & transpeople, or issue threats of harm towards them.

I'm not saying I'm a massive fan of Matt Walsh, but unlike TRAs I do feel I have some common ground with him.

We can disagree about how a woman should act & what rights she should have e.g. over her reproductive functions, but we would both be referring to the same clearly defined group, so we could actually have the conversation.

That would not be possible with a gender ideologist who denies (whilst appropriating) my very existence.

Yeah that's certainly not gone unnoticed by me.

This isn't about left or right, it's about REALITY! I don't agree with pp like Piers Morgan, Kemi Badenock, Miriam Cates, Ron de Santis, Tucker Carlson, Jordan Peterson etc on lots of things, but on this one, fundamental issue, they are all right. So should I dismiss them all because of that? No I bloody well wont.

Pp I've admired in the past are either to captured or too cowardly to speak, and I've nothing but contempt for them, as it's been left to ordinary ( extraordinary) pp, who have risked a lot to raise the alarm and try and warn pp about what is happening and this huge, destructive, reality denying emergency we are facing right now.

Excellent point, Backstreets, it's quite telling.

The difference is stark! Adult Human Female screenings have been cancelled because of violent, threatening, screaming males.

But when TRAs go to confront Matt Walsh they do so with a "good sir let me win you over with my reason" attitude, as evidenced in the videos where two trans speakers stood up to question him. Or even in the Dr Phil episode clips shown in the film. When he just goes "no, this is nonsense" they don't rage and abuse, they just get this pathetic :[ expression on their face.

WONDER WHY.

I should also add in addition to the link above there are numerous threads on this board about the film, its showings and the treatment meted out to the women who produced it and arranged the events. Strangely they have been treated far worse by TRAs than Matt Walsh has ever been.

They're both worth watching IMO. Matt is very right-wing, although to be fair I didn't realise until the last 15 mins, when he starts discussing his own views. Up to that point, I was amazed at how poker-faced he was, just asking questions and listening to the answers without offering any kind of opinion.

Some of the people he interviewed though were seriously scary and the extent to which young and middle-aged American women are captured is terrifying. That paediatrician with the short, purplish hair and supposedly hundreds of child patients

If I answer your question will you be able to see me?

Adult Human Female film can be found here:

https://adulthumanfemale.info/

now, about my questions, I now have 2

1. please describe the gender identity that cis women and trans women share

2. if you can't do that, can you explain why?

https://adulthumanfemale.info

My God, I think I have finally worked out what's behind this prejudice infused rant. Took me a while as it was so utterly detached from my reality.

Firstly, I am not left wing. I'm apolitical and have not voted for a left wing party for about 15-20 years.

Secondly, I have a masters degree in religion, have spent considerably many more years studying religion as a personal interest, have great respect for people of faith, spent a lot of time with people of faith and have a great many friends who are people of faith. I have a particular interest in Christianity, Judaism and Islam. If it weren't for the fact I am a continual name changer I could tell you to look up the many times I have defended people of faith on this site.

There is no doubt in my mind, having watched a number of Matt Walsh's videos that he firmly believes that men and women have different aptitudes, personalities and roles based based on their sex. I have no doubt he meant it when he said a boy is happy with a gun but a girl is complicated. I have no doubt that scene at the end with the wife in the kitchen was because he believes men and women have different roles.

It should have been possible for you to disagree with me on that without launching into a personal attack on me of your own prejudiced fantasy.

The two old guys on the street in San Francisco, buck naked but for cock socks were hilarious. You can never be the weirdest person on the street in San Francisco 😂

@TraumatisedGooner

I firmly believe that GCs and TRAs have more interests in common than either do with Matt Walsh

I think this is the first thing you've said that I wholeheartedly agree with.

I genuinely think most TRAs (not all) are motivated by a desire to make things better by challenging sexist roles attached to physical sex. They've just got a bit sidetracked into thinking the sexist roles are somehow innate in people's minds so the solution is to open them up to either sex rather than just get rid of them (a sidetrack that is having, let's not minimise here, pretty catastrophic results for women's social and political progress and for the poor individuals who are being influenced to physically alter their bodies).

The problem is that until the TRAs will let us talk to them, or indeed let us talk to anyone vaguely left leaning without them jumping in to warn everyone not to listen to us, and actually listen to us openmindedly and hear what we are really saying (which we know they are not doing today because of how utterly wrong they are whenever they try to describe what the GC position is), we are blocked from recognising that middle ground and finding meaningful compromises. Or even better, a new third way combining the best insights of both parties.

So if you truly believe that GCs and TRAs have more interests in common than either do with Matt Walsh, you need to stand up for GCs and help us get our voices heard. Because until that happens, until there is a space on the left for people who don't think replacing sexism with genderism is progressive, the so-called left are forcing moderate people to chose between condoning the worst excesses of genderism (the betrayal of women, the medicalisation of totally natural gender non-conformism) or joining with the right.

The gender industrial complex is worth billions of dollars globally. Compared to pharmaceutical and medical lobbying plus all the other interests this serves Walsh and The Daily Wire are small fry in comparison.

On this topic actually...

I just finished reading Kathleen stocks book. Material girls. In it she comments on how non-binary people may actually find common ground in fighting gender stereotypes with GC people. Reading that section did have me wondering if that's partly why there is such opposition to her book if TRA actually read it they could side with the GC

Which very left wing feminists are you referring to? I’d like to watch that.

He’s a misogynistic, homophobic, nationalist demagogue with an increasingly powerful platform. I can’t even imagine how warped your view of trans people must be to think they pose more danger.

Quite. There is no right way to have these conversations for TRAs, and not right person to hold these views. People with excellent credentials are also damned and attacked - see JK Rowling and the left wing women who have spent their lives fighting on before on the most marginalised.

Its just a load of shite to pretend otherwise.

I firmly believe that GCs and TRAs have more interests in common than either do with Matt Walsh.

Sadly, believing that my sex is just a feeling a sexist man can have, despite all the many issues it causes me, is a dealbreaker for me.

I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

I firmly believe that GCs and TRAs have more interests in common than either do with Matt Walsh.

Hahahaha no.

😂😂

And why didn't he just ask his wife in the first place rather than jetting off on his adventure

So about gender identity?

have you given any thought to why you’re so unable to answer this?

I thought the maasai bit was a riposte to the "binary ideas of male and female are a Western colonialist concept we imposed on the rest of the world" narrative

https://www.mediamatters.org/matt-walsh/matt-walshs-sordid-history-radio-host-exposed

I’m not going to apologise for highlighting who and what this man is. Not a single thing I said there misrepresents him.