Nancy Kelly wants us to support this man's fight to play rugby with women.

Who wants to place bets on a puff piece in the Graun or from the dying embers of Vice, featuring DARVO?

Oh yes, surely a job for Ben Hunte!

Perhaps Nancy Kelley will update us seeing as NK was so keen to promote the cause?

Who wants to place bets on a puff piece in the Graun or from the dying embers of Vice, featuring DARVO?

Are they stretchy pants?

They simply cannot lie straight in bed.

That applies to one hell of a lot of them, it's rapidly becoming a defining feature.

Hounded off? We were desperate to help this person to reach for justice!

They simply cannot lie straight in bed.

Does that mean all pledges will be refunded?

Well. The transwomen in women's rugby campaign set up by Curtiss is no longer on the Crowd Justice website.

Interesting.

I wonder what Curtiss's next move will be?

Whingeing about being "hounded off CrowdJustice"?

Well. The transwomen in women's rugby campaign set up by Curtiss is no longer on the Crowd Justice website.

I wonder what Curtiss's next move will be?

He currently has a 'Terf tears' mug on product on sale on Insta - just £25 a go. His previous sales campaign was the rugby training shirt with the Roses emblem on it and blood stain imagery. He certainly understands the gentle art of persuasion.

I'm a straight married woman so obviously the more sexless the underwear, the better!

I can assure you that Julie would not bother getting a key cut to get at my pants!!!!

(Too soon? I doubt the stepmother is laughing yet 😞)

@JanesLittleGirl

"Is it possible that Tigger's understanding of the relationship between choice of underwear and sexuality is just a load of bigoted bollocks?"

+++
Is there a cut chart available showing which personal choice of underwear correlates to which sexuality?

It certainly provides a good Sunday article and reason to revisit Allison Bailey's experience with crowdfunding and censorship.

I don't think you could do an FOI to crowd justice as they only apply to public bodies sadly. Otherwise Mermaids and Stonewall would be sinking under the weight of them.
Some sort of public challenge would be very delicious though.

There's an archive and a wayback page. But only at a certain point in time.

I do recall seeing a name on there who - if it's genuinely the person the name aligned to - might bring a freedom of speech case against crowdfunder for deletion.

Which absolutely would not mean a Streisand Effect at all. Oh no.

Why is the crowd funder itself still up then? Its very unkind to women.

That is a possibility, Janes. A distinct possibility.

Is it possible that Tigger's understanding of the relationship between choice of underwear and sexuality is just a load of bigoted bollocks?

Good idea, @FannyCann , thanks. Maybe I should contact crowd justice to ask why they took comments down. They were, after all, supportive of the case!

Can you put a block on the payment @rhywlodes just incase they want to take it after removing your comment?

Well done btw, it was very entertaining watching the comments yesterday.

I made one of the £5 donations and a comment - have just checked bank balance and there's no trace of it having even gone out...

If this case succeeds in creating a "case by case" rule based on individuals and not situations*, then rugby organisations that do let transwomen play women's rugby will have to have all female players sign a disclaimer similar to that which World Rugby demands of transgender men who play men's rugby.

Something like:

"Written acknowledgement and acceptance by the player of the associated risks of playing contact rugby with transgender women who are biologically male and statistically likely to be stronger, faster and heavier than them, given the predictions this combination of variables makes for injury risk".

*IANAL but I've read that in the Equality Act "case by case" refers to situations not individuals, so that there can be blanket exceptions applicable to a group.

Just checking the crowdfunder.
Looks like unkind comments have been removed. I wonder if the donations from those who welcome the chance to thrash this out in court have been refunded.

Surely if he's receiving money based on the lie that he's banned from playing rugby altogether (rather than just not being able to pick a sex category) this must be fraud?

Nancy's tweet now - must be mostly those 6 TERFs from the UK with their thousands of sock accounts viewing it because the public is really behind women getting smashed up, brain damaged and having their backs broken playing rugby against the likes of Tiger Girl and love the idea of teenage girls sharing changing rooms and showers with Curtiss, right?

Views 3,000,000
Likes 212
Quotes 1,329