Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Loos 'cleaned by all genders'

68 replies

PotteringPondering · 20/04/2023 10:25

Spotted by entrance to loos at Waterloo Station. My brief observations:

  1. Not 'by people of all genders', but 'by all genders'. Presumably, spectral genders swirl around the bowl.

  2. Not 'both genders' or 'different genders', but 'all genders'. Given the growing list, good luck with that.

  3. No punctuation. Could mean either 'don't be alarmed (that) these facilities are cleaned by all genders', or 'don't be alarmed (about anything in life) – these facilities are cleaned by all genders (so the world is a lovely place)'.

Loos 'cleaned by all genders'
OP posts:
RocketIceLollie · 21/04/2023 19:11

With the problem of attracting employees generally, let alone cleaning public loos, I guess it's a case of whoever they get to do the job.

Am I the only one who always feel guilty using a loo that the cleaner has just cleaned when the cleaner is in the room?

JanesLittleGirl · 21/04/2023 18:56

thatsn0tmyname · 21/04/2023 18:20

If 78 people are cleaning that loo, it'll need to be located in a pretty big cubicle.

And an actual male cleaner would be leaning on a mop, watching an actual female cleaner doing the work while telling her where she was going wrong.

thatsn0tmyname · 21/04/2023 18:20

If 78 people are cleaning that loo, it'll need to be located in a pretty big cubicle.

MotherofPearl · 21/04/2023 17:58

DiscoBeat · 21/04/2023 14:57

What a lot of fuss. You know what they meant.

That's not the point, and there is a 'fuss' for two good reasons:

  1. As other posters have pointed out, there are some women who can't use mixed sex public loos and therefore the messaging on this needs to be clear (and I think women need to have access to single-sex spaces).

  2. The signs (mine and the OP's) both demonstrate the pernicious misuse of the word gender, and the ridiculous lengths people will go to to avoid saying sex, even if this is what they mean.

If only male cleaners are available to clean the women's loos, the sign could simply be: "Male cleaner in attendance."

nilsmousehammer · 21/04/2023 17:47

Grammarnut · 21/04/2023 16:47

When bursting for a pee choice is generally not an option. No male cleaners is better.

And for some women no mixed space is an option.

Imagine bursting for a pee, seeing that sign and knowing it's a disabled loo if you're lucky, or you're searching for the next nearest one while trying to hold on.

This is about the women not sufficiently privileged to be able to make a choice. If there's a male in there they cannot go in . These women need access to the world too. At least an employee is going to be there briefly, and tell you that they are there.

RoseslnTheHospital · 21/04/2023 16:54

Of course it may not be possible to wait or find an alternative, but better to be forewarned at least and to be aware that someone is actively present cleaning.

Grammarnut · 21/04/2023 16:47

RoseslnTheHospital · 20/04/2023 11:08

What is great is that according to the website of "The Sidings" at Waterloo, they have a Changing Places toilet, which has a hoist and other facilities for changing/toileting physically disabled people who have carers.

They also seem to have separate male and female toilets, and to have separate babychange facilities.

It's a shame about this fairly pointless sign. I would hope that they would stick to the standard practice when male cleaners are present in female toilets, and display a sign to that effect for the duration. Women should be given the courtesy of being given enough information to make an informed choice.

When bursting for a pee choice is generally not an option. No male cleaners is better.

Grammarnut · 21/04/2023 16:46

MishyJDI · 20/04/2023 10:53

For the protection of women and girls no man should be allowed to clean a woman’s toilet. This needs to be made illegal. Then any man in the ladies can be swiftly identified and thrown out.

This. Whenever I see a male cleaner I always object. Usually they say something like 'no-one else can get in', which is bs. Allowing male clearners to clean women's lavatories allows ANY man in - all he needs is dark trousers and a lanyard. My DH hates that women clean male toilets, too, he says it is undignified for the women and the men. Opposite sex cleaners need to be illegal.

Deathbyfluffy · 21/04/2023 16:37

MishyJDI · 20/04/2023 10:53

For the protection of women and girls no man should be allowed to clean a woman’s toilet. This needs to be made illegal. Then any man in the ladies can be swiftly identified and thrown out.

It's fairly easy to identify a cleaner - they usually have cleaning things with them.
It's unreasonable to expect small businesses to employ two cleaners, one female and one male (remember, equality means the men's loo will also need a men's cleaner) - so any law would get nowhere near being passed.

I get the point of your post, but it's just not practical.

Newyeardietstartstomorrow · 21/04/2023 16:36

For the protection of women and girls no man should be allowed to clean a woman’s toilet. This needs to be made illegal. No, let's not go back to making cleaning toilets women's work.

ApocalipstickNow · 21/04/2023 16:34

MotherofPearl · 21/04/2023 10:18

OP, I see your sign and I raise you "cleaned by all gender team members." Confused

Manchester Victoria railway station.

I don’t think that’s going to be very clean.

DiscoBeat · 21/04/2023 14:57

What a lot of fuss. You know what they meant.

nilsmousehammer · 21/04/2023 14:24

Unfortunately all are incidents women have had to deal with - those being the women who can use a mixed sex space. Many have just had to stop going in there. Inclusion needs to apply to them too.

KitKatLove · 21/04/2023 13:48

nilsmousehammer · 21/04/2023 13:11

You're very lucky.

Wouldn't it be lovely if we lived in a world where all females were as lucky as you?

Well if you have witnessed all these that you mention in your local convenience

the male employee wank noisily in a cubicle, wave around a sword with which to punish any female who dares to breathe too loudly, stuff used tampons up his bum, take selfies of self with females (breathless thrills) or try to have pyjama parties/hand out tampons/instigate pillow fights or otherwise make a complete arse of themselves

then yes I guess I am lucky to have avoided it.

nilsmousehammer · 21/04/2023 13:11

KitKatLove · 21/04/2023 10:26

As long as the toilets are clean I don’t care who does the job.

You're very lucky.

Wouldn't it be lovely if we lived in a world where all females were as lucky as you?

KitKatLove · 21/04/2023 10:26

As long as the toilets are clean I don’t care who does the job.

MotherofPearl · 21/04/2023 10:18

OP, I see your sign and I raise you "cleaned by all gender team members." Confused

Manchester Victoria railway station.

Loos 'cleaned by all genders'
Beenhereforever1978 · 21/04/2023 00:21

AmuseBish · 20/04/2023 10:57

I for one will complain if I don't see a cakegender cleaning there. I WAS PROMISED ALL GENDERS!

Seconded.

PastMyBestBeforeDate · 21/04/2023 00:19

At once? Gosh it could get crowded.

howdoesatoastermaketoast · 20/04/2023 23:39

I wonder if this needs to be moved to pedants corner I'm feeling all sorts of feelings but they're actually much more grammar related.

Male cleaners in the ladies are not ideal but also not new.

YouJustDoYou · 20/04/2023 19:04

I just want to know if there'll be penis in there, because then I can know to avoid.

YouJustDoYou · 20/04/2023 19:04

nilsmousehammer · 20/04/2023 16:40

If there is not a bifluid goliath gendered demi boi cleaner I am going to be cross. Especially on Tuesdays.

In reality, the sign should say that a male employee is currently cleaning the toilets, which permits women who cannot use mixed sex spaces an informed choice on whether to wait or go elsewhere. Which is the point. Since inclusion is not a trans male only thing.

Should the male employee wank noisily in a cubicle, wave around a sword with which to punish any female who dares to breathe too loudly, stuff used tampons up his bum, take selfies of self with females (breathless thrills) or try to have pyjama parties/hand out tampons/instigate pillow fights or otherwise make a complete arse of themselves, there is at least an employer to point out that this person should not be in this role or sent into this space.

😂😂

YouJustDoYou · 20/04/2023 19:03

Well of course it says that, I mean if they said male/female then the fairy unicorn non-binary trans cats would be in uproad that they'd been left out, wouldn't they?

TomeTome · 20/04/2023 18:44

I don’t give a tick what gender you think you are just stick a sign up saying if there’s a male cleaner in there AND how long they’re going to be. So I can choose if I want to use the facilities. Please fill up the soap dispenser and make sure the basin plug is not blocked and if at all possible shoot the hand dryer.

While you are thinking about extra facilities could we think about female carers who care for males over the age of 6. We need to piss sometimes. Ta

nepeta · 20/04/2023 18:36

'All genders' is meaningless in that context. Like saying that the cleaners will all have different hairstyles. Who cares?

Actually, this thread shows that if biological sex actually would be erased from all language the concept of 'gender' would be superfluous. But things would be worse for women as sexism would not be erased, only our ability to clearly talk about whom it affects.

Swipe left for the next trending thread