Gender GP, Susie Green and their Residential for ‘Trans Kids’

How can you eradicate trans people 🤔

If after being allowed to keep their bodies healthy and functioning they eventually grow out if being trans then surely they were never really trans.

And if they are killing themselves /dying then given schools are now full of trans kids wouldn't we be tripping over bodies everywhere?

That's a bit of an odd tweet considering the suicide case that made the paper was about a female child who was actually given access to the drugs and was on testosterone via online " services ".

And 2 very prominent case with very clear mental health issues were transitioned aged 2 and placed on blockers and given surgery at a young age.

What point do they actually think they are making here?

This, this, this!

This study of c1000 people has some stats, but I unfortunately can't access it.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224499.2016.1139034

mentioned here:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554425/

'Paraphilias, in general, are more common in men, with reasons unknown.[13] A recent study conducted looked specifically at the desire for and experience of paraphilic behaviors of a sample population demographically representative of the general population. The sample size contained a total of 1,040 persons classified according to gender, age, education, ethnicity, religion, and location of residency. Researchers found that almost half of the study population expressed interest in one or more paraphilic categories, with approximately one-third of this population actually acting on this interest at least once. Specifically, fetishism, frotteurism, voyeurism, and masochism held a prevalence of 15.9% (value considered to be statistically unusual), with interest in both males and females. Interest levels in fetishism and masochism revealed no statistically significant difference amongst males and females. The research found that the most common paraphilic interest amongst men is often voyeurism and fetishism.'

I don’t think most women can understand at all or even imagine some of the things which some men finding arousing.

Fetishes and paraphilias are almost exclusively confined to the male sex. I've not met many women that even begin to understand them, let alone share the more extreme paraphilias.

Thank you Biology.

I absolutely cannot understand (I hope I never do understand) how some men can get aroused by watching other men, and boys being castrated.

This for me is a strong argument for single sex spaces where we are vulnerable or undressed. I don’t think most women can understand at all or even imagine some of the things which some men finding arousing. I also don’t think we should have to in order to be on our guard now that places where we are vulnerable or undressed are more and more often mixed sex, we certainly shouldn’t have to explain it to our daughters.

I don’t understand how making images or videos of women using the toilet is arousing to some men, I don’t understand why some men want to take used menstrual products from bins…

I mean clearly men and women are very different in our tastes and preferences in these matters. I know (at least I hope) that it is a minority of men who have these strange proclivities but it doesn’t seem that women have them at all, most of us would find all that I have listed here, distressing, disgusting or at the very least in the case of watching people use the toilet, uninteresting.

Nowadays if I happen to find myself alone in women’s changing rooms or toilets I feel afraid until a few more women appear. I never used to feel that way but now you just never know if a dangerous or disturbing man will be in there.

I cannot understand how gender identity/queer theory ever got past robust child safeguarding that I thought was applied in schools, social services and the NHS.

As others said, PREVENT should be on the case with this.

It is outrageous that camps for “trans” children are allowed. We should be protecting children and supporting them to accept and value the bodies they have not encouraging them to look forward to surgery which will impair the functioning of their bodies permanently.

Again once we recognise this for a religious belief and treat it as such, parents, teachers, doctors will I believe approach it differently and with more caution.

More and more I find myself coming to the conclusion that just as with the recent judgment on castration no one, adult or child should be able to consent to “trans” surgeries or cross sex hormones due to the harm that they do to people and the fact that no mentally healthy person would seek such an extreme and detrimental physical “solution” to a problem of psychological distress.

And of course NHS Scotland had to apologise for hosting a link to said fetish castration site. Again, Reduxx has the receipts. Keep up, legacy media.

https://reduxx.info/nhs-scotland-apologizes-for-eunuch-gender-identity-document-leak/

I wasn't aware Green was so heavily involved.

Let's not forget that WPATH, the world professional association for transgender health, included a link to a fetish castration site in their guidelines.

https://4w.pub/trans-health-authority-cites-castration-fetish-site-in-guidelines/

Susie Green co-authored the 8 edition of their 'Standards of Care'.

Excellent posts, Pomegranate - thanks!

I wasn't familiar with Cluster B, so here's a link in case I'm not alone:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_disorder#Cluster_B_(dramatic,_emotional_or_erratic_disorders)

I'm glad it's getting some exposure, as it were, in the press.

But I bet there's still something of a perception filter going on.

People need to realise that mean subscribe channels where they watch castrations being done, and get sexual gratification from it, as does the person who is having it done to them.

For example castration and double mastectomy of children we would likely agree is not morally defensible.

Indeed - and yet umpteen men are currently on trial for castrating each other, because you can't consent to such harm. You really couldn't make it up.

To conclude my thoughts, when we are able to treat gender identity as the religious belief it is, I think that it will naturally lose some of its attraction for the people with cluster B personality traits as they will gain less power from it. We will also be able to apply reasonable restraints on its practice where those practices conflicts with the rights of others or what we as a society deem morally acceptable. For example castration and double mastectomy of children we would likely agree is not morally defensible.

At the moment we basically have this new quasi religious belief system, which society elevates to the highest level (without fully understanding those beliefs or their consequences for the rest of us) so that its practitioners cannot be questioned and mustn’t be offended.

That is really, really dangerous in my opinion.

So people with cluster B personality disorders manipulating an army of people with ASD traits and others who lack critical thinking skills or just tend to be easily manipulated…

I really think that the sooner we recognise gender identity as a religious belief and give it the same rights and protections that we give other religious beliefs, no more, no less, the better.

Most of the problems we are facing with it come down to the fact that it is a faith position but it is being pushed by institutions which should know better as irrefutable, settled fact as if we have made a major scientific discovery about the nature of humanity and the world more generally about which there can be no doubt.

Many of us don’t believe that trans identities (having a soul of one sex in the body of the other sex) are real in the same way that atheists don’t believe that deities are real. We don’t want to hurt or disadvantage anyone who believes in gender identity, we just don’t want to be forced to share that belief or have that belief impact on us unnecessarily. Currently we are in the process of restructuring society to favour this one religious belief over all others and over not believing at all, including its core tenet of what we would normally call out as child mutilation. We recognise breast ironing and FGM for what they are. This new religious belief obscures almost identical practices.

It makes me absolutely sick to my stomach that Green, Webberley and all the other zealots and grifters are able to do this, especially to kids..

Indoctrinating vulnerable kids to believe that people, and their government, hate them and want them dead? Fucking hell. I just can't comprehend how they could possibly think that could help those kids.

Unless helping them is less important than boosting their ranks with loyal and desperate followers...? Much like some kind of religious group, often living together, whose beliefs are considered strange by many people

I’ve been saying this for years. Schroedinger’s transgenderism. Simultaneously not an illness and in desperate need of “life-saving” healthcare.

It's amazing how fast they go from "stolen land acknowledgement now" to "ackshually, Native people who don't agree that there's a trans genocide are traitorous boot-kissing rats"

😶

At least it wasn't an exchange trip to Thailand...

Imagine going back 20 years and stopping the ridiculous GRA in its tracks. We had no idea.

It switches from an innate essence, which must be allowed to flower and thrive to something which needs lifelong medication to sustain, so fast, whiplash is guaranteed.

Working with the visionary@HelenWebberley for trans people, fighting for access to timely effective care that refuses to pathologise. (5/14)

'Refuses to pathologise'? So they're not ill then.

An entire generation of young people who have no foreseeable access to desperately needed and life saving healthcare. I am determined to work hard with others to question and challenge this, and provide a viable alternative until the system catches up. But really, WTF? (11/14)

Healthcare is 'desperately needed and life saving' for these children who are not ill.

Susie, if they're not ill then the healthcare can't be 'desperately needed and life saving'. WTF indeed.

😨

38 likes. Wow.

Also I wonder if people should report some of those tweets for telling lies to children.

Even questioning the Special Glittery People is seen as fascism, bigotry, evil.

I've been called a Nazi for suggesting kids don't need to be cut up (as have many others). How did we get here?

This. Social Services should be onto this.
But they are captured, so they are looking the other way. They won't question the Special Glittery People.