Life without GC women

Firstly you ain't no old school feminist.

Secondly "Being GC adds nothing to society other than intolerance, division, hostility" is the biggest pile of irony I've ever read on the women's rights board

Thirdly "the horrific rate of suicide deaths amongst trans people" doesn't exist and I'm 100% sure that you know that

People genuinely think that it is women who think that biological sex, that instill the concept of biological sex upon the whole of humankind? And if only we disappear, men can have babies?

Oh my days.

Being GC adds nothing to society other than intolerance, division, hostility and contributing to the horrific rate of suicide deaths amongst trans people.

Or it could be that you are weaponising and exaggerating the suicide deaths among transpeople to try and push through an unpopular agenda that is trying to take away women's safegurading against the wishes of the majority of women.
Any push back that you receive you characterise as intolerance and hostility.

So as an “old school feminist” please explain how males reducing being a woman to a feeling, or sexist stereotypes is beneficial for women? As a feminist, shouldn’t you be believing the woman who says a man is not a woman rather than the man who says he is? Otherwise aren’t you doing exactly what you have claimed never to do, and be putting men first.

pas an old school feminist, please could you explain how gender identity benefits women and enhances womens rights?

Echo chamber? In your dreams. The world is waking up to this nonsense and no one, even "your lot" thinks that humans can change sex.

Unfortunately, @inininsomnia what we’re trying to point out, in the many discussions on this board, is that what some people seem to think of as living as ‘the gender that matches their reality’ includes forcing the other humans around them to jump through hoops, lose their privacy and dignity, and throw out an awful lot of safeguarding. It makes it very difficult to ‘live in cooperation with one another. ‘

@inininsomnia , do you believe that men convicted of sexual offences against women should be held in womens prisons? Do you think that men should play full-contact rugby against women? Do you think it is acceptable for a sex offender to change his name and gender, and thus evade safeguarding checks?

It starts with pronouns and #bekind, but it ends at places like this. I am not trying to attack you, but I would like to hear your thinking on these very real societal issues.

'You lot'....eh, you're not feminist love, you're a handmaiden.

The people 'imposing their will on others' are trans rights activists demanding that everyone comply with their version of reality.
Why should everyone be compelled to participate in their self image? If a man declares he's a woman, just because he says so - why the hell should I just accept that, and let him into women's spaces?

Do you run a women's refuge in Brighton by any chance?

@inininsomnia Happily, there isn't a chance that you lot are the majority in society but all the laws have to be changed to accommodate men who want to be women?

Rapists in women's prisons. Do you support that because you don't think women are vulnerable to male violence, or is it because you think there is a class of men who should be excluded from safeguarding.

@Thelnebriati Yes, but I'd bet my house that it was women who cleaned those pubs!

You might miss them when you find out the majority of the population is GC.
Your life in every single area would be noticeably poorer / not functional. And with no sense of decency / societal rules off the table day to day life would descend into dangerous chaos.

Enjoy that.

In which case, you'll presumably be fine with male people with TQ+ identities just self excluding themselves from all spaces they feel they can't access and everyone else just cracking on as they are? Good. That's all sorted then. Bit shit for those males, but if self exclusion's not a problem, ok, I believe you.

But you do support mens right to impose their will on women by insisting that they’re also women because they “feel” like one even though they’re fully intact adult males?

KnitFastDieWarm1 GC means 'gender critical' - people who think (among other things) that sex based facilities shouldn't be provided on the basis of gender identity.

Stupid females, wanting to have space away from penis. How bigoted. (I'm being sarcastic).

Anyone self excluding would be doing so because it suits your (and people like you) agenda. The ones mentioned up thread that put male feelings above female safety and dignity.

And why wouldn't you use the word female? It covers women and girls. You know, those ones that are expected to share their single sex space with penises.

Could someone tell me what GC means?! Gender something I presume.

I don't support GC attempts to impose their will on others.

When its its you that wants to change the law to remove my existing rights, its you imposing your will on others.

WHAT a typo!! 🤣 I meant TWAW of course. Butterfingers.

Ah here they are already. That was faster than usual.
What is it going to take for people to realise we need ALL voices, especially those who point out glaring holes in the current trend du jour? Will people wake up one day and realise what they have lost by "cancelling" people? Or will they just blindly sleepwalk into the next step of this social experiment gone grotesquely wrong?
On the plus side, from another thread it looks like AI are going to wipe us all out next week so then the TWAT crowd won't need to bother.

We'll you obviously don't support the females that will self exclude from their own single sex spaces once they realise they have become mixed sex. Nor the ones that won't have a choice to self exclude so will be forced to put up with it.