Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Don’t politicise Relationships, Sex & Health Education, 50+ VAWG experts warn

27 replies

IwantToRetire · 24/03/2023 16:43

In the wake of a number of devastating and high-profile murders of women, the exposure of misogyny and racism in our police forces, and the rising impact of online misogynist influencers – the government has often restated its commitment to tackling violence against women and girls. Prevention work, including RSHE, is a critical part of the government’s Tackling VAWG Strategy – which commits that the Department for Education will better support teachers to deliver the RSHE curriculum. As such, we were keenly awaiting the scheduled review of the RSHE statutory guidance, which we now understand the government intends to bring forward by a number of months.

In light of recent headlines – which have the potential to incite opposition to much needed RSHE delivery in schools, we are seeking assurances that the upcoming review will not be unnecessarily politicised, and will be focused on what children and young people need to live happy and healthy lives, and the urgent need to do more to tackle VAWG and the rising influence of online misogyny in schools.

Worth reading the letter in full and the headlines they reference as indications that the issue is being politicised. And to see who have signed it.

https://www.endviolenceagainstwomen.org.uk/dont-politicise-relationships-sex-health-education-50-vawg-experts-warn/

Don’t politicise Relationships, Sex & Health Education, 50+ VAWG experts warn | End Violence Against Women

Following recent headlines which have the potential to incite opposition to desperately needed Relationships, Sex, Health and Education (RSHE) in schools, a coalition of 54 organisations and experts in violence against women and girls have today (22nd...

https://www.endviolenceagainstwomen.org.uk/dont-politicise-relationships-sex-health-education-50-vawg-experts-warn

OP posts:
ResisterRex · 24/03/2023 17:57

This is the statement:

"In light of recent headlines[1][2] – which have the potential to incite opposition to much needed RSHE delivery in schools, we are seeking assurances that the upcoming review will not be unnecessarily politicised..."

They're relying on these for it:

No1:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/03/09/ofsted-chiefs-warning-explicit-sex-education-lessons/

No2:
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2023/mar/08/sex-education-review-is-politically-motivated-say-teaching-unions

So do they mean that people will use these headlines to oppose the outcome? If so, am I reading this that the opposition will come from those heavily invested in the QT+?

So the letter is OK? But yes I agree about the fact it doesn't include parents' concerns. And parents who've had to navigate ROGD/who are navigating it right now, are important, as are their kids.

Cass was going to look at schools. That has to be part of this review too. Yes it's sex education but it's also a vehicle for transing gay kids. The bit from Cass:

"Several issues that were raised with us are not explored further in this interim report, but we have taken note of them. These will be considered further during the lifetime of the Review and include:
● The important role of schools and the challenges they face in responding appropriately to gender-questioning children and young people."

https://cass.independent-review.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Cass-Review-Interim-Report-Final-Web-Accessible.pdf

dimorphism · 24/03/2023 17:12

No mention of parents I see. or safeguarding.
Parents, you know, those people who house, clothe, feed and nurture their children. Care about them the most and know them best. Poor form.

Sounds like a funding pitch. Also with all the listening to children's voices a little worryingly as if they're adults, not children. We've seen that before.
Maybe they mean well but I am not convinced by this.

Swipe left for the next trending thread