Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Richard Dawkins says trans activists 'bullied' JK Rowling for standing up for women's rights

159 replies

PorcelinaV · 21/03/2023 20:57

Richard Dawkins says trans activists 'bullied' JK Rowling for standing up for women's rights

https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/scottish-news/richard-dawkins-says-trans-activists-29511706

Richard Dawkins claims trans activists 'bullied' Harry Potter author JK Rowling and Kathleen Stock for standing up for women's rights....

He claimed that it was very upsetting that a "tiny minority" of people managed to capture the discourse to "talk errant nonsense".

Richard Dawkins says trans activists 'bullied' Harry Potter author JK Rowling

The biologist called out the bullying of the Harry Potter author and Kathleen Stock for asking people to discuss certain points of controversial issues

https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/scottish-news/richard-dawkins-says-trans-activists-29511706

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
FrancescaContini · 22/03/2023 08:32

Wanderingowl · 22/03/2023 08:22

I saw a response on Twitter saying he's an evolutionary biologist so should stay in his lane as he doesn't understand gender. 😜

😂 “Doesn’t understand gender”

Signalbox · 22/03/2023 08:29

I can’t stand Dawkins and his ill informed rants against Christianity - he’s a biologist, not a theologian, and equivalent to a vicar trying to pontificate on biology after reading Noddy’s guide to wildlife

Does a person need to be a theologian to express an opinion about religion / Christianity now?

Kucinghitam · 22/03/2023 08:22

DemiColon · 21/03/2023 21:45

I don't have much time for Dawkins when he tries to talk about philosophy, but he seems to be a good scientist and he is always willing to say things that he thinks are important even if they are very unpopular.

But I don't think it will make much impact. In a way he's similar to a lot of other public intellectuals who have spoken out on this, or other free speech issues, from a pretty classical liberal background. A lot of them now seem to be considered "right wing" when 10 years ago they were fairly mainstream centrists, or even part of the left.

There's plenty of so-called outspoken rational materialist atheists who have been totally silent about genderism, or some even fervently championing it. Almost as if for them, their so-called rational atheism was actually itself a religion of CleverAndCoolNotLikeThatLot.

So for me it's almost a feeling of relief to hear that Dawkins has kept a consistent rational worldview.

Wanderingowl · 22/03/2023 08:22

I saw a response on Twitter saying he's an evolutionary biologist so should stay in his lane as he doesn't understand gender. 😜

Babdoc · 22/03/2023 08:20

What is “errant” nonsense? Is it worse than arrant nonsense?!
I can’t stand Dawkins and his ill informed rants against Christianity - he’s a biologist, not a theologian, and equivalent to a vicar trying to pontificate on biology after reading Noddy’s guide to wildlife - but I will take any allies we can get, to defend women’s rights!

TheGreatATuin · 22/03/2023 08:05

He's a staunch atheist and a scientist. He was always going to have difficulty just accepting the gendered souls woo and the pseudoscience that's coming out of the trans movement.
I'd love to see him follow up The God Delusion with The Gender Delusion. Not only would it be a fascinating read, but he'd make a mint.

KatMcBundleFace · 21/03/2023 22:17

Any pressure is good.

He's fighting the next religion

DemiColon · 21/03/2023 21:45

I don't have much time for Dawkins when he tries to talk about philosophy, but he seems to be a good scientist and he is always willing to say things that he thinks are important even if they are very unpopular.

But I don't think it will make much impact. In a way he's similar to a lot of other public intellectuals who have spoken out on this, or other free speech issues, from a pretty classical liberal background. A lot of them now seem to be considered "right wing" when 10 years ago they were fairly mainstream centrists, or even part of the left.

EdgeOfACoin · 21/03/2023 21:07

He also stated there are only two sexes. He was crystal clear about it.

Are the TRAs going to claim that Dawkins is in the pocket of the Religious Right now?

Personally, I'm not Dawkins' biggest fan but I'm glad he's speaking up.