Humza Yousaf says TransWomen are Women Except When They're At It

@Whooyou 😂😂😂

"Barbie Kardashian" got his conviction today and gets to spend his time in the women's prison in Ireland. 14 previous convictions, threatened to rape and murder his mother, ripped a women's eyelids off,... still put in a women's prison.

How many more of these need to happen? It's so sickening

Isla Bryson should not have been in a women's prison ... Isla Bryson is a rapist who is completely at it; I don't think they're a genuine transwoman, I think they're trying to play the system.

It is so, so simple. Adam Graham (let's drop this Isla Bryson crap) raped two women. Here are the only two options.

• Adam Graham is pretending to be a transwoman. We can't tell, can we, due to the wonders of self-ID. But he raped two women, and shouldn't be in a women's prison.
• Adam Graham is really a transwoman. This is irrelevant. The relevant fact is that he raped two women and so he shouldn't be in a women's prison.

As any idiot knows (except it seems, Humza), self-ID is highly risky, since noone can tell the difference between a "real" and a "pretend" transwoman. And even if we could, all the evidence points to transwomen reflecting the spectrum of male behaviours, including rape, sexual aggression, violent threats, fetishes. Transwomen do not follow female pattern behaviours, where these are extremely rare.

Though of course, the feelings and wishes of the transwoman/pretend transwoman rapist are more important than the safety of the female prisoners.

I know it's late, but these letters have got so many and so ridiculously stupid that It took me a while to notice the extras.

And yeah @LizzieSiddal called it right TIT will do!

And you do not want to search TIT in the gif option.

Nice cute feathered birds?....Nope...

😂

@TheBiologyStupid I think you only need the last three letters. TIT sums him up quite nicely.

LGBQATIT+?!

The world awaits Humza.

You have announced a new identity.

At it.

The world is hanging on your every word now. Don't keep us waiting.

I agree that in Scots parlance "at it" means engaging in deception. Humza should be made to say, in so many words, that he thinks Isla Bryson lied to gain access to vulnerable women. Because that's exactly the thing that Humza and any number of SNP and Green MSPs said categorically never happens, and that anyone saying it did was hateful and bigoted against trans people.

After which he should be asked whether it takes a rape conviction to demonstrate that someone is at it. Was Bryson lying about his gender identity prior to conviction? When he enrolled in the beauty course which gave him access to young women? Thing is, most rapes don't result in a conviction, so is it at least theoretically possible, dear Humza, that some rapists who haven't been convicted might also be at it? In which case, those pesky women who keep asking for some safeguarding/gatekeeping measures might, just might, have a point.

Yup

Exactly.

Humza is legislating on the basis of "at it".

Best he tells us all precisely what "at it" means in law?

Can he do that? He seems to have pronounced on the basis that he can.

BloodyHellKen · Today 09:28

It's almost as if Humza is trying to have his cake and eat it 🤔

I hope he chokes on it. He has no excuse, he knows exactly what is going on and that he has played a major part in it.

He cannot plausibly claim not to have known that men like Pink Leggings would do exactly what he did and like many others, abuse the wide eyed acceptance of many that they are Real Women ™

Many people told him and his ridiculous colleagues that exactly these sorts of incidents, Dolatowski trying to rape girls in toilets, masturbators in changing rooms, etc etc etc as a pretext to access female only spaces.

He shouted them down, said it would never happen, called them ignorant bigots. He said none of his constituents had ever broached the subject with him.

You may believe him, if you do, I'm an African Prince and would like to borrow your bank account and I'll pay you €1 million.

He, Sturgeon and the rest of the squalid gang have blood on their hands, which could have been easily avoided, but they chose ideology over reality, so as to present themselves as progressive.

They deserve nothing but our contempt.

Why are we arguing about the meaning of "at it"? The context seems clear. The bottom line is that the putative First Minister doesn't know his arse from his elbow.

Sorry. I have to disagree that someone being 'at it' means that they are 'doing something you disapprove of'. In Scottish parlance it means that they are conning you or someone else - they are pretending something for nefarious purposes. Eg. 'Wee Fergus wisnae ill at all. He was at it to get a day aff school' .

Oof! My embarrassment genes came out in cringe mode for him.

Sorry, but I’m sure you can understand my eagerness to hang on Humza’s every word.

Best me to it, MissLucy!

Hilariously, HY today met a group of Ukrainian refugees and asked them where all the men were 🤦‍♀️- Link

Reactions on Twitter are divided between:

1. how can he not know the answer, and
2. how does he know they aren’t men

By 'above the radar' I refer to posting 'silly billies in Westminster messing with Scottish Transgender issues' on FB.

SNP membership figures just released - 72,000 - down by 30,000 in the last two years. Interesting!

So Labour are even more F*ed than I thought they were !!!

Well that meaning fits in too, you know sending a double rapist to a women's prison. He'll be "at it" 24/7.

Labour don't need Scottish votes, as explained here: wingsoverscotland.com/why-labour-doesnt-need-scotland/
But maybe they don't read Wings.

I see no difference between Yousaf and Bryson, two misogynists who enact their violence against women in different ways.