When? And what were the words?
Because I interpret these tweets with a focus on final part of the statement :
Tweets from 9/3/3023 19.27.
The issue of consent is that one leak leads to many. When thinking about how we’ve got here, a place where schools are able to socially transition kids behind their parents back, it’s essential to rigorously examine all of the mechanisms that may have assisted.
This does not mean I endorse any kind of forced birth. Ever. But I cannot ignore that child traffickers have been able to exploit laws that enable vulnerable girls to be abused.I cannot ignore that it’s not only at risk under sixteen year olds that are given the pill. Without parents knowledge
There may well be a more appropriate way of protecting vulnerable girls without creating deceit in all families.
This idea of consent is dangerous and open to all sorts of abuses.
We should be careful to vigilantly monitor unintended consequences.
To be clear, I am referring to this:
There may well be a more appropriate way of protecting vulnerable girls without creating deceit in all families.
This idea of consent is dangerous and open to all sorts of abuses.
We should be careful to vigilantly monitor unintended consequences.
This does not indicate that she is advocating the extreme view you are saying she is.
What part of “This does not mean I endorse any kind of forced birth. Ever.” indicates that she is not about centring the child’s needs but supporting them within a family structure where it is safe?
She is clear in saying she is against ‘creating deceit within families’. She has not qualified that to the extreme you seem to have interpreted.